Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Calculations contact addition

The Hertzian model was used to calculate depth dependencies of elastic moduli for a set of polymeric materials (Figure 5). Data are presented here at 0.5Hz frequency of contact. Additional measurements at various frequencies showed very strong frequency dependence for polymeric materials as will be discussed in a separate publication. [Pg.185]

Calculating the resistance of each current-carrying component separately is a very cumbersome and lengthy procedure, in addition to being not very accurate due to the large number of approximations. Some of the joints and components may still have been omitted from these calculations. The easier and more often recommended procedure is to measure the resistance between the extreme ends of each feeder in its ON condition by an Ohm-meter. This resistance will also include the contact resistance of each terminal and joint. [Pg.425]

Guirao and Bach (1979) used the flux-corrected transport method (a finite-difference method) to calculate blast from fuel-air explosions (see also Chapter 4). Three of their calculations were of a volumetric explosion, that is, an explosion in which the unbumed fuel-air mixture is instantaneously transformed into combustion gases. By this route, they obtained spheres whose pressure ratios (identical with temperature ratios) were 8.3 to 17.2, and whose ratios of specific heats were 1.136 to 1.26. Their calculations of shock overpressure compare well with those of Baker et al. (1975). In addition, they calculated the work done by the expanding contact surface between combustion products and their surroundings. They found that only 27% to 37% of the combustion energy was translated into work. [Pg.189]

Toxicity alucs for carcinogenic effects also can be c.xprcsscd in terms of risk per unit concentration of the substance in the medium where human contact occurs. These measures, called unit risks, are calculated by dividing the slope factor by 70 kg and multiplying by the inhalation rate (20 m /day) or the water consumption rate (2 L/day), respecti ely, for risk associated with unit concentration in air or water. Where an absorption fraction less than 1.0 has been applied in deriving the slope factor, an additional conversion factor is necessary in the calculation of unit risk so that the unit risk will be on an administered dose basis. The standardized duration assumption for unit risks is understood to be continuous lifetime c.xposure. Hence, when there is no absorption conversion required ... [Pg.337]

The orientational relationships between the martensite and austenite lattice which we observe are partially in accordance with experimental results In experiments a Nishiyama-Wasserman relationship is found for those systems which we have simulated. We think that the additional rotation of the (lll)f< c planes in the simulations is an effect of boundary conditions. Experimentally bcc and fee structure coexist and the plane of contact, the habit plane, is undistorted. In our simulations we have no coexistence of these structures. But the periodic boundary conditions play a similar role like the habit plane in the real crystals. Under these considerations the fact that we find the same invariant direction as it is observed experimentally shows, that our calculations simulate the same transition process as it takes place in experiments. The same is true for the inhomogeneous shear system which we see in our simulations. [Pg.98]

Most studies on heat- and mass-transfer to or from bubbles in continuous media have primarily been limited to the transfer mechanism for a single moving bubble. Transfer to or from swarms of bubbles moving in an arbitrary fluid field is complex and has only been analyzed theoretically for certain simple cases. To achieve a useful analysis, the assumption is commonly made that the bubbles are of uniform size. This permits calculation of the total interfacial area of the dispersion, the contact time of the bubble, and the transfer coefficient based on the average size. However, it is well known that the bubble-size distribution is not uniform, and the assumption of uniformity may lead to error. Of particular importance is the effect of the coalescence and breakup of bubbles and the effect of these phenomena on the bubble-size distribution. In addition, the interaction between adjacent bubbles in the dispersion should be taken into account in the estimation of the transfer rates... [Pg.361]

Fig. 4—Film thickness in the central contact region [18]. The ball is 23.5 mm in diameter and the lubricant is mineral oil CN13604 with no additives. Temperature is 25 C and load 4 N. The film thickness in Curve b is the data of the total thickness (Curve a) minus the static film thickness. The data of Curve c is calculated from Hamrock-Dowson formula (1981). Fig. 4—Film thickness in the central contact region [18]. The ball is 23.5 mm in diameter and the lubricant is mineral oil CN13604 with no additives. Temperature is 25 C and load 4 N. The film thickness in Curve b is the data of the total thickness (Curve a) minus the static film thickness. The data of Curve c is calculated from Hamrock-Dowson formula (1981).
Eqn. 3.106 must be considered as an approximate relationship for at least two reasons first, the assumption of a rapid complete coverage of the Pt electrode surface by Ag right from the start of the electrolysis is certainly incorrect (cf., Bard and Faulkner150) second, at the end of the electrolysis the remaining Cu2+ solution is virtually in contact with a silver electrode instead of a copper electrode, for which E u2+, Cu = 0.340 V is valid. Practice has shown that by means of CPE, selective electro-deposition and thus electrogravimetry of silver in addition to copper is possible down to 10 8MAg+, as the above calculation indicates. [Pg.231]

With the addition of a pseudopotential interaction between electrons and metal ions, the density-functional approach has been used82 to calculate the effect of the solvent of the electrolyte phase on the potential difference across the surface of a liquid metal. The solvent is modeled as a repulsive barrier or as a region of dielectric constant greater than unity or both. Assuming no specific adsorption, the metal is supposed to be in contact with a monolayer of water, modeled as a region of 3-A thickness (diameter of a water molecule) in which the dielectric constant is 6 (high-frequency value, appropriate for nonorientable dipoles). Beyond this monolayer, the dielectric constant is assumed to take on the bulk liquid value of 78, although the calculations showed that the dielectric constant outside of the monolayer had only a small effect on the electronic profile. [Pg.60]

For this chapter we continue to describe the use of confidence limits for comparison of X, Y data pairs. This subject has been addressed in Chapters 58-60 first published as a set of articles in Spectroscopy [1-3]. A MathCad Worksheet ( 1986-2001 MathSoft Engineering Education, Inc., 101 Main Street Cambridge, MA 02142-1521) provides the computations for interested readers. This will be covered in a subsequent chapter or can be obtained in MathCad format by contacting the authors with your e-mail address. The Worksheet allows the direct calculation of the f-statistic by entering the desired confidence levels. In addition the confidence limits for the calculated slope and intercept are computed from the original data table. The lower limits for the slope and the intercept are displayed using two different sets of equations (and are identical). The intercept confidence limits are also calculated and displayed. [Pg.399]


See other pages where Calculations contact addition is mentioned: [Pg.87]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.749]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.2647]    [Pg.2749]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.1042]    [Pg.1350]    [Pg.1434]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.824]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.1057]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.1568]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.87]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.496 ]




SEARCH



Additivity calculation

Calculations (contact

Contact additives

© 2024 chempedia.info