Bubbling dense fluidization

It is seen that for Geldart types A and B particles, fast fluidization requires superficial gas velocities approximately an order of magnitude greater than that for bubbling dense beds. In many applications of fast fluidization, the particles exiting top of the bed are captured by cyclones and recirculated for makeup injection at the bottom of the bed, hence this regime is also denoted as circulating fluidization, CFB. 

Dense-phase fluidized beds with bubbles represent the majority of the operating interests although the beds may also be operated without bubbles. The bubbling dense-phase fluidized bed behavior is fluidlike. The analogy between the bubble behavior in gas-solid fluidized beds and that in gas-liquid bubble columns is often applied. Dense-phase fluidized beds generally possess the following characteristics, which promote their use in reactor applications ... 

Most gas-solid systems experience a range of flow regimes as the gas velocity is increased. Several important gas-solid fluidization regimes for the chemical process industry are sketched in Fig 10.1. In dense fluidized beds regions of low solid density may be created. These gas pockets or voids are frequently referred to as bubbles. 

There is little information on the process of heat transfer between particles and gas in fast fluidized beds. One reason for this situation is the expectation that the heat transfer rates are high and therefore of little concern. The smaller concentration of particles (in comparison to bubbling dense beds) implies less intense heat source concentration in the cases of exothermic reactions, and this also alleviates potential concern. At the time of this writing, there is no established model or correlation for estimation of the heat transfer coefficient between particles and gas during fast fluidization. 

The velocity at which gas flows through the dense phase corresponds approximately to the velocity that produces incipient fluidization. The bubbles rise, however, at a rate that is nearly an order of magnitude greater than the minimum fluidization velocity. In effect, then, as a consequence of the movement of solids within the bed and the interchange of fluid between the bubbles and the dense regions of the bed, there are wide disparities in the residence times of various fluid elements within the reactor and in... 

Because of the inadequacies of the aforementioned models, a number of papers in the 1950s and 1960s developed alternative mathematical descriptions of fluidized beds that explicitly divided the reactor contents into two phases, a bubble phase and an emulsion or dense phase. The bubble or lean phase is presumed to be essentially free of solids so that little, if any, reaction occurs in this portion of the bed. Reaction takes place within the dense phase, where virtually all of the solid catalyst particles are found. This phase may also be referred to as a particulate phase, an interstitial phase, or an emulsion phase by various authors. Figure 12.19 is a schematic representation of two phase models of fluidized beds. Some models also define a cloud phase as the region of space surrounding the bubble that acts as a source and a sink for gas exchange with the bubble. 

---