Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Breakup combined mechanisms

In an atmospheric spray tower the air movement - is dependent on atmospheric conditions and the aspirating effect of the spray nozzles. Natural-draft cooling tower operation depends on a chimney or stack to induce air movement. Mechanical-draft cboling towers utilize fans to move ambient air through the tower. Deck-filled towers contain tiers of splash bars or decks to assist in the breakup of water drops to increase the total water surface and subsequently the evaporation rate. Spray-filled towers depend only on spray nozzles for water breakup. Coil shed towers are comprised of a combination structure of a cooling tower installed on top of a substructure that contains atmospheric section coils. Hyperbolic natural-draft cooling towers are typically large-capacity systems. [Pg.59]

Eyelid retraction can produce findings in several associated tests that may correlate with the onset of the ophthalmopathy. Marginal reflex distance can be used to assess upper eyelid retraction. A light sonrce is placed in front of a patient in primary gaze to prodnce a corneal reflex. This distance between the corneal reflex and the upper eyelid margin is measured. The normal measurement is 4 to 5 mm. Another possible finding is a rednction in the tear breakup time of one or both eyes. EyeUd retraction causes an increase in the ocular surfece area that must be covered by the tear film, and there is an associated decrease in blink frequency in Graves patients. An increase in tear osmolarity also affects the mechanics of tear stability in these patients. The combination of these factors affects stability of the tear film. [Pg.647]

The DPF method [5-7] assumes spray formation is a combination of random and nonrandom processes. An instability analysis is used to describe primary breakup, which is uniquely determined for a given set of initial conditions (fluid physical properties and atomizer parameters) and a model of the breakup mechanism. The drop size distribution arises from fluctuations in the initial conditions due to such factors as gas and liquid turbulence, atomizer passage surface roughness, vortex shedding, liquid mixture composition, etc. [Pg.481]

If both mechanisms are combined, the results shown in Fig. 11-5 are obtained where curve 1 is capillary breakup, curve 2 cohesive failure and curve 2a combined cohesive failure and capillary waves. [Pg.399]

Figure 6.22a-e show breakup by shedding off small droplets from the bulbous ends ( end-pinching mechanism Stone and Leal, 1989) for 0.05

combined action of instabilities and end-pinching for /i = 1 and L/R = 14. Apparently, the time scale of the end-pinching mechanism is less than the time scale of the instability mechanism in cases where end-pinching prevails. [Pg.186]


See other pages where Breakup combined mechanisms is mentioned: [Pg.511]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.1996]    [Pg.1660]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.2754]    [Pg.2760]    [Pg.799]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.1663]    [Pg.1667]    [Pg.1967]    [Pg.641]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.824]    [Pg.2911]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.142 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.142 ]




SEARCH



Breakup

Breakup mechanisms

Combined mechanisms

© 2024 chempedia.info