Bond dissociation energy polarity

More than just a few parameters have to be considered when modelling chemical reactivity in a broader perspective than for the well-defined but restricted reaction sets of the preceding section. Here, however, not enough statistically well-balanced, quantitative, experimental data are available to allow multilinear regression analysis (MLRA). An additional complicating factor derives from comparison of various reactions, where data of quite different types are encountered. For example, how can product distributions for electrophilic aromatic substitutions be compared with acidity constants of aliphatic carboxylic acids And on the side of the parameters how can the influence on chemical reactivity of both bond dissociation energies and bond polarities be simultaneously handled when only limited data are available ... 

For such situations we have developed a different approach. The parameters calculated by our methods are taken as coordinates in a space, the reactivity space, A bond of a molecule is represented in such a space as a specific point, having characteristic values for the parameters taken as coordinates. Figure 6 shows a three-dimensional reactivity space spanned by bond polarity, bond dissociation energy, and the value for the resonance effect as coordinates. 

Figure 6, Reactivity space having bond polarity, Q, bond dissociation energy, BDE, and resonance effect parameter, R, as coordinates ...

The entire set of molecules contained 782 bonds out of which 111 a-bonds were selected. The parameters were calculated by our methods to build a reactivity space with electronegativity difference, resonance effect parameter, bond polarizability, bond polarity, a-charge distribution, and bond dissociation energy as six coordinates. 

Next, supervised-learning pattern recognition methods were applied to the data set. The 111 bonds from these 28 molecules were classified as either breakable (36) or non-breakable (75), and a stepwise discriminant analysis showed that three variables, out of the six mentioned above, were particularly significant resonance effect, R, bond polarity, Qa, and bond dissociation energy, BDE. With these three variables 97.3% of the non-breakable bonds, and 86.1% of the breakable bonds could be correctly classified. This says that chemical reactivity as given by the ease of heterolysis of a bond is well defined in the space determined by just those three parameters. The same conclusion can be drawn from the results of a K-nearest neighbor analysis with k assuming any value between one and ten, 87 to 92% of the bonds could be correctly classified. 

Solve the HMO equations for the orbitals and orbital energies of the C—C and C— bonds assume that h(O) = h(C) — hco, hcc = hco, and Sco = 0. Sketch the results in the form of an interaction diagram. Which bond is stronger Calculate the homolytic bond dissociation energies in units of hcc - What is the net charge on O, assuming that it arises solely from the polarization of the bond ... 

The bond dissociation energy of cleavable bonds of telogens appears to be a key parameter to take into account regarding reactivity. This is followed by various factors controlling the reactivity (such as energetic, electronic, polar, steric, conformational effects and role of orbital interactions) of a radical and its orientation of addition. 

Examination of 3-indolyl compounds for relationships between antioxidation potential (using in vitro LP assays) and electronic, polar, and steric parameters, including bond dissociation energies, bond lengths, dipole moments, electronic charge densities, and molecular size parameters showed that antioxidant efficacy of 3-indolyl compounds was most strongly predicted... 

---