Boltzmann distribution function, complex

Detailed modeling study of practical sprays has a fairly short history due to the complexity of the physical processes involved. As reviewed by O Rourke and Amsden, 3l() two primary approaches have been developed and applied to modeling of physical phenomena in sprays (a) spray equation approach and (b) stochastic particle approach. The first step toward modeling sprays was taken when a statistical formulation was proposed for spray analysis. 541 Even with this simplification, however, the mathematical problem was formidable and could be analyzed only when very restrictive assumptions were made. This is because the statistical formulation required the solution of the spray equation determining the evolution of the probability distribution function of droplet locations, sizes, velocities, and temperatures. The spray equation resembles the Boltzmann equation of gas dynamics[542] but has more independent variables and more complex terms on its right-hand side representing the effects of nucleations, collisions, and breakups of droplets. 

The association rate data determined in this study can be used to make quite a precise binding energy estimate for the aluminum ion-benzene complex. The relation between the association rate constant and the binding energy was made with use of phase space theory (PST) to calculate as a function of E, with a convolution over the Boltzmann distribution of energies and angular momenta of the reactants (see Section VI). PST should be quite a reasonable approximation for... 

Let a unit volume of an isotropic medium comprise Vvib/2 of such pairs (nonrigid dipoles). We shall calculate the generated complex susceptibility x by using the high-frequency approximation for which it is assumed that at the instant just after a strong collision the velocities and position coordinates are given by the Boltzmann distribution (marked by the subscript B). Then, in view of Eq. (3.5) in GT1, the complex susceptibility x is proportional to the spectral function L ... 

The value f may be referred to as the excitation factor. It is a complex function of excitation conditions and must be determined experimentally for every case. An exception is the thermal or equilibrium emission for which the ratio of excited to unexcited molecules (f) fits the Boltzmann distribution. 

The energy distribution over various degrees of freedom in the products of exchange reactions depends both on the energy distribution of the reactants and the interactions within the collision complex. For the Boltzmann distribution of reactants, the distribution function of products Fini(T) arising from reaction (8.6) is expressed by a partially averaged microscopic rate constant k (T Im) (see Section III.8)... 

The Lattice Boltzmann method involves simulating a Boltzmann distribution of velocities on each site of a lattice. The distribution functions are allowed to evolve on a lattice to an equilibrium chosen to satisfy given conservation laws. On sufficiently large length- and time-scales, the macroscopic hydro-dynamic equations are obeyed. The method is thus suitable for modelling complex flows induced by shear, as well as diffusive processes such as phase separation. 

One of the ways of circumventing the problem of finding multiple energy minima of complex molecules is to turn to more sophisticated techniques that are capable of sampling phase space efficiently without the need to home in on particular minimum energy conformations. The two most useful techniques are molecular dynamics (MD) and the Monte Carlo (MC) method. Both approaches make use of the same types of potential functions used in molecular mechanics, but are designed to sample conformation space such that a Boltzmann distribution of states is generated. MC and MD techniques for molecular systems have been widely reviewed [11-14], and only the basics of the two methods are described below. 

---