Blob formation

Here Ry stands for a typical ionization potential. Equation (2) indicates that the terminal positron blob is a spherical nanovolume, which confines the end part of its trajectory. This is where ionization slowing down is the most efficient (the thermalization stage of the subionizing positron is not included here). The mathematical formulation of this statement is twofold. Just after the first blob formation step , which is ltr Wu) (the thick arrow in Fig. 5.1), the positron reaches the center of the blob. After that, the end part of the ionization slowing-down trajectory is embraced by the blob i.e., the slowing-down displacement of the positron, Rion Wbi, Ry) — au is equal to the radius of the blob, au-... 

Binodal 185,237,245,246 Blob formation 243 Blobs 225,244,246,249 Bond angle 227 Bond length 227... 

Swellings are formed resulting abnndant accumulation of microorganisms and their metabolites in a definite part of the fiber. They may be accompanied by fiber wall break indnced by biomass pressure. In this case, microorganisms and their metabolites splay out that causes blobs formation from the fiber and breaks in the yam, as well as irregular fineness and strength. 

Figure 6.1 Attack of the proplyds A Hubble Space Telescope close-up of the Orion Nebula reveals disks of dust and gas surrounding newly formed stars. These fuzzy blobs, called proplyds, may be infant solar systems in the process of formation. This chunk of the sky spans about 0.14 light-years. (Image courtesy of Charles Robert O Dell of Vanderbilt University and NASA.)...

In spite of numerous experiments, many features of the e+ spur (or blob ) are still unknown and debated. In particular, discordant views are commonly expressed about the number of electrons participating effectively to Ps formation this may range from rather large ( 10—30) [26, 27] to only about one (in average) [ 19, 20, 28]. Note that in case of successive e and e+ captures, the total inhibition constant, k, and the bound-state formation constant, K4, are found to be similar, while this is a priori expected only if the number of electrons involved is close to 1 [19, 20],... 

In this chapter we will briefly discuss mechanisms of the positron slowing down, the spatial structure of the end part of the fast positron track, and Ps formation in a liquid phase. Our discussion of the energetics of Ps formation will lead us to conclude that (1) the Ore mechanism is inefficient in the condensed phase, and (2) intratrack electrons created in ionization acts are precursors of Ps. This model, known as the recombination mechanism of Ps formation, is formulated in the framework of the blob model. Finally, as a particular example we consider Ps formation in aqueous solutions containing different types of scavengers. 

Between positively charged ions and knocked-out intrablob electrons there exists strong Coulombic attraction. Thus out-diffusion of the electrons (even during their thermalization) is almost completely suppressed and the distribution of ions is close enough to that of electrons (Problem 2). This case is known as ambipolar diffusion when ions and electrons expand with the same diffusion coefficient equal to the duplicated diffusion coefficient of the ions (Problem 3). Thus blob expansion proceeds very slowly and may be practically neglected in the problem of Ps formation. 

Fig. 5.3 The spatial distribution of the positron density at the Ps formation stage when an external electric field E is imposed. efn is that part of the positron density that is bound within the blob and not biased by the external electric field. is the part perturbed by the field. The depth of the trapping potential is about several tenths of eV.

There are two models which utilize this mechanism, the spur model [18, 16] and the blob model (diffusion-recombination model) [19, 20]. In spite of the fact that both models answer the question about the Ps precursor in the same way, they differ as to what constitutes the terminal part of the e+ track and how to calculate the probability of the Ps formation. 

The statement that the terminal part of the e+ track is a blob but not a spur, is not just a question of terminology. Processes (IER, Ps formation) related to energy dissipation and screening of local electric fields, proceed there in a different way. At present, experimental data clearly indicate that e+ behavior in the blob is quite different from that of intrablob electrons and ions. e+ is rather mobile and easily escapes from the blob during its thermalization (see experiments on Ps formation in electric fields [26, 27] and measurements of e+ mobility [28]). Particularly, it implies that the multiparticle nature of the terminal part of the e+ track cannot be correctly taken into account via the factor no/(no + 1) in Eq. (11). 

Expansion of the blob. Because of attraction between ions and electrons, expansion of the blob is governed by the law of ambipolar diffusion. As a result out-diffusion of electrons is almost completely suppressed, but the diffusion coefficient of ions is increased by a factor of two. Thus, blob expansion proceeds very slowly and may usually be neglected in the problem of Ps formation. 

In spite of some important distinctions in the structure of the terminal positron blob and spurs, ionization columns and blobs of 5-electrons, where reactions of radiolytic hydrogen (H2) formation take place, these processes have much in common and it is natural to describe them in the framework... 

Further developments in this field would probably be forthcoming with more precise studies of the energetics of Ps formation, and measurements of the work functions for e+ and Ps using low-energy positron beams. Better understanding may come from studies of Ps formation at different temperatures and external electric fields (determination of e+ mobility, investigation of the positron-blob interaction, e+ thermalization parameters and its spatial distribution). 

Nevertheless, it seems promising to investigate the problem of Ps formation jointly with the similar problem of intratrack radiolytic hydrogen formation. Despite some distinctions in conditions inside the terminal positron blob and spurs, blobs and ionization columns where reactions of formation of Ps and H2 occur, these processes have much in common. Their joint description diminishes uncertainty of the parameters involved in the model and leads to more reliable conclusions. 

In the course of conformational transition the number g of monomer units forming the electrostatic blob increases. For the case of relatively short chain (small value of m) or relatively weak degree of ionization / the collapse transition is ended by the formation of spherical globules. The condition for spherical globule formation is... 

---