Biosensor generations

Figure 17.1 Biosensor generations R, receptor component (reproduced with the permission of Elsevier Science Publishers BV).

Scanning electrochemical microscopy can also be applied to study localized biological activity, as desired, for example, for in-situ characterization of biosensors (59,60). In this mode, the tip is used to probe the biological generation or consumption of electroactive species, for example, the product of an enzymatic surface reaction. The utility of potentiometric (pH-selective) tips has also been... 

FIGURE 6-4 Schematic of a first-generation glucose biosensor (based on a probe manufactured by YSI Inc.). 

Enzyme sensors are based primarily on the immobilization of an enzyme onto an electrode, either a metallic electrode used in amperometry (e.g., detection of the enzyme-catalyzed oxidation of glucose) or an ISE employed in potentiometry (e.g., detection of the enzyme-catalyzed liberation of hydronium or ammonium ions). The first potentiometric enzyme electrode, which appeared in 1969 due to Guilbault and Montalvo [140], was a probe for urea with immobilized urease on a glass electrode. Hill and co-workers [141] described in 1986 the second-generation biosensor using ferrocene as a mediator. This device was later marketed as the glucose pen . The development of enzyme-based sensors for the detection of glucose in blood represents a major area of biosensor research. 

On the other hand, if the hole flow in DNA could be artificially controlled to deposit at the desired site in DNA, it may enable site-selective oxidation and strand scission of DNA, which is desirable from a therapeutical standpoint. Furthermore, understanding DNA-mediated hole transfer is expected to lead to an additional application in the development of biosensors and bioelectronic devices [9]. Therefore, the regulation of the transfer rate and direction of the hole generated in DNA is of interest from the perspective of using DNA as a building block for electronic devices. 

Table 1. H202-generating enzymatic systems for chemiluminescence-based optical fibre biosensors (Abbreviations OX = oxidase, PNPase = purine nucleoside phosphorylase).

MWNTs favored the detection of insecticide from 1.5 to 80 nM with a detection limit of InM at an inhibition of 10% (Fig. 2.7). Bucur et al. [58] employed two kinds of AChE, wild type Drosophila melanogaster and a mutant E69W, for the pesticide detection using flow injection analysis. Mutant AChE showed lower detection limit (1 X 10-7 M) than the wild type (1 X 10 6 M) for omethoate. An amperometric FIA biosensor was reported by immobilizing OPH on aminopropyl control pore glass beads [27], The amperometric response of the biosensor was linear up to 120 and 140 pM for paraoxon and methyl-parathion, respectively, with a detection limit of 20 nM (for both the pesticides). Neufeld et al. [59] reported a sensitive, rapid, small, and inexpensive amperometric microflow injection electrochemical biosensor for the identification and quantification of dimethyl 2,2 -dichlorovinyl phosphate (DDVP) on the spot. The electrochemical cell was made up of a screen-printed electrode covered with an enzymatic membrane and combined with a flow cell and computer-controlled potentiostat. Potassium hexacyanoferrate (III) was used as mediator to generate very sharp, rapid, and reproducible electric signals. Other reports on pesticide biosensors could be found in review [17],... 

---