Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Binding surface density

In this work the state-of-the-art and perspectives of column characterization and compai ison have been presented and discussed. All information about physico-chemical properties of RP HPLC Cl8 and C8 columns as porosity, average surface area, free silanol concentration, binding ligand density and others, were summarized. The points of views about column classifications, its advantages and disadvantages were discussed. It was shown that Cl8 and C8 HPLC column classification processes do not allow selecting the column with the same or preai range selectivity. [Pg.131]

The circles in Fig. 16.6a show the calculated sensitivity, AX/Am for these different cases. As can be seen, the innermost holes are the most sensitive to any refractive index changes in the local environment as opposed to the holes that are further away from the cavity. These results can be explained by noting that the evanescent field is largest inside the innermost holes and decreases inside holes that are situated further away from the cavity. This is important to note because targeting only the inner most holes for functionalization allows for the lowest possible limit of mass detection for this device. In the case where only the inner two holes are functionalized we find that the resonance shifts by 3.5 nm when 1 fg of DNA binds to the resonator. Therefore, a mass change of 10 ag would result in a mass surface density of 0.84 ng cm 2 and an approximate shift of 0.01 nm, which can be experimentally detected. We therefore take this as the potential LOD of the device. [Pg.460]

Recently, we have studied the effect of the surface density of states on the charge-transfer probability, in the case where the surface possesses localized states created by surface perturbations or the presence of adatoms. For the tight-binding linear chain these perturbations or adatoms are taken into account by changing the electronic energy of the end atom of the chain to a, which differs from the energy a of the other atoms in the chain. This difference can lead to the formation of a localized surface state, whose energy is... [Pg.362]

Steroid hormones derivatized as glycerylphosphate dialkyl esters and spread at an air/water interface allowed the two-dimensional recrystallization of proteins bearing the specific receptors. The direct observation of 2D-proteins arrays by electron microscopy allowed to exhibit the parameters that govern the binding such as film fluidity or ligand accessibility, ordering and surface density [149]. [Pg.304]

For many proteins and many surfaces, the adsorption will be essentially irreversible, which will result in a Scatchard plot with a shape which is not easily analyzed. The models and methods presented here are not adequate for treating such data. It is important under such conditions to redo the adsorption experiment, preferably on a modified surface of lower binding site density or energy. Figure 12 outlines in schematic form what one might expect if this is done, although no such data are at present available in the literature. [Pg.24]

First, the number of binding sites is much larger for absorption than for adsorption where the maximum surface density is typically 1014 sites cm-2. If the effective thickness of the selective layer is 1 im and a bound molecule occupies a cube (lnm3), the maximum number of binding sites increases from 10 10 mol cm-2 for adsorption up to 10 7 mol cm3 for absorption. [Pg.6]

Nearly all theories to date predict that IETS intensities should be proportional to n, the surface density of molecular scatterers. Langan and Hansma (21) used radioactively labeled chemicals to measure a surface concentration vs solution concentration curve ( Fig. 10 ) for benzoic acid on alumina using the liquid doping technique. The dashed line in Fig. 10 is a 2 parameter fit to the data using a simple statistical mechanical model by Cederberg and Kirtley (35). This model matched the free energy of the molecule on the surface with that in solution. The two parameters in this model were the surface density of binding sites ( 10" A )... [Pg.231]

Balamumgan S, Obubuafo A, McCarley RL, Soper S, Spivak D (2008) Effect of linker structure on surface density of aptamer monolayers and their corresponding protein binding efficiency. Langmuir 390(4) 1009-1021... [Pg.74]


See other pages where Binding surface density is mentioned: [Pg.159]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.432]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 ]




SEARCH



SURFACE DENSITY

Surface binding

© 2024 chempedia.info