Bias node

There are three inputs in this application we choose to feed in the Cartesian coordinates X and Y of a data point through two of the inputs the third input is provided by a bias node, which produces a constant signal of 1.0. The values shown beside each connection are the connection weights. 

As we shall see in the next section, the output of a node is computed from its total input the bias provides a threshold in this computation. Suppose that a node follows a rule that instructs it to output a signal of +1 if its input is greater than or equal to zero, but to output zero otherwise. If the input signal from the bias node, after multiplication by the connection weight, was +0.1, the remaining inputs to the node would together have to sum to a value no smaller than -0.1 in order to trigger a... 

In the network in Figure 2.11, the connection weight on the X input signal and the bias node are equal to the coefficients of X1 and X° in equation (2.10), while the connection weight on the Y input is -1.0. When the node calculates the sum of the weighted inputs, it is computing ... 

Fig. 2 A small feed-forward neural network for the interpolation of a three-dimensional function, as indicated by the three nodes in the input layer. It has two hidden layers containing four and three nodes, respectively, and one node in the output layer providing the energy E. All fitting parameters are shown as arrows. The bias node acts as an adjustable offset to shift the nonlinear range of the activation functions at the individual nodes.

We will show several different ways of finding the node voltages and branch currents. First we will use the bias display markers provided by Capture. 

Set up the DC Bias simulation (select PSpice and then New Simulation Profile) and then run PSpice (PSpice and then Run). When the simulation is complete, display the node voltage at Voc on the schematic ... 

I is the number of input variables, J is the number of nodes in the hidden layer to be optimized. The model output S was set to 1 for the cubic MCM-48 structure, 2 for the MCM-41 hexagonal form and 3 for the lamellar form. The input variables Ui and U2 were the normalized weight fractions of CTAB and TMAOH, respectively. Hj+i and U1+1 are the bias constants set equal to 1, and coj and coy are the fitting parameters. The NNFit software... 

In words, the bias input unit is given an input signal of value -1 the second unit, -.25 the third unit value. 50 and the fourth unit, 1.0. Note that although theoretically any range of numbers may be used, for a number of practical reasons to be discussed later, the input vectors are usually scaled to have elements with absolute value between 0.0 and 1.0. Note that the bias term unit in Figure 2.7, which has a constant input value of -1.0, is symbolized as a square, rather than a circle, to distinguish it from ordinary input nodes with variable inputs. 

The basic feedforward neural network performs a non-linear transformation of the input data in order to approximate the output data. This net is composed of many simple, locally interacting, computational elements (nodes/neurons), where each node works as a simple processor. The schematic diagram of a single neuron is shown in Fig 1. The input to each i-th neuron consists of a A-dimensional vector X and a single bias (threshold) bj. Each of the input signals Xj is weighted by the appropiate weight Wij, where] = 1- N. 

The electron affinity, which is very small for the Fe atom (0.15 eV), has so far not been reliably calculated. However, even the essentially zero affinity obtained is a tremendous improvement from the uncorrelated value of -2.36 eV. One of the reasons for the small remaining errors is that only simple trial functions were used. In particular, the determinants were constructed from Hartree-Fock orbitals. It is known that the Hartree-Fock wavefunction is usually more accurate for the neutral atom than for negative ion, and we conjecture that the unequal quality of the nodes could have created a bias on the order of the electron affinity, especially when the valence correlation energy is more than 20 eV. One can expect more accurate calculations with improved trial functions, algorithms, and pseudopotentials. 

---