Beta blockers myocardial infarction secondary

People with diabetes have a much worse outcome after acute myocardial infarction, with a mortality rate at least twice that in non-diabetics. However, tight control of blood glucose, with immediate intensive insulin treatment during the peri-infarct period followed by intensive subcutaneous insulin treatment, was associated with a 30% reduction in mortality at 1 year, as reported in the DIGAMI study. In addition, the use of beta-blockers in this group of patients had an independent secondary preventive effect (198). The use of beta-blockers in diabetics with ischemic heart disease should be encouraged (199). 

There is strong evidence that beta-blockers can reduce mortality by up to 23% post myocardial infarction. Beta-blockers should be used to reduce the risk of further cardiovascular disease events irrespective of whether the blood pressure is raised or not. There is no evidence that any beta-blocker is more effective than another in secondary prevention, hence a beta-blocker which is well tolerated and that can be taken once or twice daily should be used. Atenolol, bisoprolol or metoprolol are suitable agents. These agents are not specifically licensed post myocardial infarction but all are licensed for angina and the doses for this indication should be used i.e. 

Intermittent claudication has also been reported to be worsened by beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, but has been difficult to document because of the difficulty of study design in patients with advanced atherosclerosis. As early as 1975 it was reported from one small placebo-controlled study that propranolol did not exacerbate symptoms in patients with intermittent claudication (70). This has subsequently been supported by the results of several large placebo-controlled trials of beta-blockers in mild hypertension and reports of trials of the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, in which intermittent claudication was not mentioned as an adverse effect, even though it was not a specific contraindication to inclusion (71). In addition, a comprehensive study of the effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with intermittent claudication did not show beta-blockade to be an independent risk factor for the disease (72). In men with chronic stable intermittent claudication, atenolol (50 mg bd) had no effect on walking distance or foot temperature (73). These findings have been confirmed in a recent meta-analysis of 11 randomized, controlled trials to determine whether beta-blockers exacerbate intermittent claudication (SEDA-17, 234). 

---