Bell correction

Theories for hydrogen transfer that treat hydrogen as a quantum mechanical particle have been presented [30-35] ho vever, most of these models are not fully developed with respect to KIE predictions. These models do agree with some of the basic conclusions taken from the bond-stretch model and the Bell correction, specifically that marked deviations of KlEs from predictions of the bond-stretch model occur when the quantum nature of hydrogen is pronounced. The basic criteria used to evaluate how closely a particular reaction obeys the bond-stretch KIE model and, by extension, a classical reaction model is presented below. In the subsequent sections of theory (Section 10.4) and experimental systems (Section 10.5), more detailed examples of nonclassical KlEs are presented. 

An analysis of a tunneling correction from the experimental kn/ko relies upon a calculation of the transition-state structure to obtain the bond-stretch kn/kn, and the tunneling effect. Once the transition-state structure is calculated, the tunneling probability is primarily a function of the imaginary frequency (v ) for the reaction coordinate. The truncated Bell correction is shown in Eq. (10.8). This correction... 

Becke and Roussel (BR) functional, 185 Bell, Evans, Polanyi (BEP) principle, 364 Bell correction, tunnelling, 391 Bending energy, in force fields, 11 BLYP function, 188 Boltzman probability function, 374 Bond critical points, electron density analysis, 225... 

It is possible to derive tunnel corrections for functional forms of the energy barrier other than an inverted parabola, but these cannot be expressed in analytical form. Since any barrier can be approximated by a parabola near the TS, and since tunnelling is most important for energies just below the top, they tend to give results in qualitative agreement with the Bell foimula. 

Triethyl phosphite can be obtained from Virginia Carolina Chemical Corp., Eastman Kodak Co., Aldrich Chemical Co., K and K Laboratories, and Matheson, Coleman and Bell. The presence of dialkyl hydrogen phosphite or trialkyl phosphate is not deleterious, but a correction for assay is required. Fractionation readily separates triethyl phosphite (b.p. 48-49°/ll mm.) from diethyl hydrogen phosphite (b.p. 72°/ll mm.) and triethyl phosphate (b.p. 90°/10 mm.). The presence of amines and amine hydrochlorides may seriously interfere with the alkylation, especially in the case of trimethyl phosphite (see Table I). The checkers redistilled triethyl phosphite obtained from Matheson, Coleman and Bell. 

Using Tinker s approach, BELL(12, i22) has described a semi-analytical method, based on work at the University of Delaware, which allows for the effects of major bypass and leakage streams, and which is suitable for use with calculators. In this procedure, the heat transfer coefficient and the pressure drop are obtained from correlations for flow over ideal tube banks, applying correction factors to allow for the effects of leakage, bypassing and flow... 

It is still possible to enhance the resolution also when the point-spread function is unknown. For instance, the resolution is improved by subtracting the second-derivative g x) from the measured signal g x). Thus the signal is restored by ag x) - (7 - a)g Xx) with 0 < a < 1. This llgorithm is called pseudo-deconvolution. Because the second-derivative of any bell-shaped peak is negative between the two inflection points (second-derivative is zero) and positive elsewhere, the subtraction makes the top higher and narrows the wings, which results in a better resolution (see Fig. 40.30). Pseudo-deconvolution methods can correct for sym-... 

In Bell s method the heat-transfer coefficient and pressure drop are estimated from correlations for flow over ideal tube-banks, and the effects of leakage, bypassing and flow in the window zone are allowed for by applying correction factors. 

The mean heat-transfer coefficient will depend on the number of tubes crossed. Figure 12.31 is based on data for ten rows of tubes. For turbulent flow the correction factor Fn is close to 1.0. In laminar flow the heat-transfer coefficient may decrease with increasing rows of tubes crossed, due to the build up of the temperature boundary layer. The factors given below can be used for the various flow regimes the factors for turbulent flow are based on those given by Bell (1963). 

Any suitable method can be used to determine the pressure drop in the window area see Butterworth (1977). Bell used a method proposed by Colburn. Corrected for leakage, the window drop for turbulent flow is given by ... 

The Bell equation gives the correct behavior for the ionization cross section at both high- and low-impact energies. In cases where autoionization is important it is not always possible to reproduce the cross section from the single equation above, but if it is used in two separate fits, one from the ionization threshold to the autoionization threshold, and the second above the autoionization threshold, a good fit to the cross section may be obtained over the entire range. 

For a balanced historical record I should add that the late W. E. Blumberg has been cited to state (W. R. Dunham, personal communication) that One does not need the Aasa factor if one does not make the Aasa mistake, by which Bill meant to say that if one simulates powder spectra with proper energy matrix diagonalization (as he apparently did in the late 1960s in the Bell Telephone Laboratories in Murray Hill, New Jersey), instead of with an analytical expression from perturbation theory, then the correction factor does not apply. What this all means I hope to make clear later in the course of this book. 

Bell and Timimi, 1973. The reference intramolecular reaction is the enolization of the substrate conjugate acid catalysed by ethanolamine (pA, 9.50), and EM is corrected for the different pA, using p = 0.8 and for the effect of the protonated nitrogen... 

Bell, R. P. Tunnel effect corrections for parabolic potential barriers,Trans. Far. Soc. 55, 1 (1959). 

A second widely used approximation uses the more smoothly shaped Eckart barrier (Fig. 6.1), which for a symmetric barrier may be expressed as V = V sech2(x) = V [2/(ex + e x)]2 where x = jts/a with s a variable dimension proportional to the displacement along MEP, and a a characteristic length. Like the Bell barrier the Eckart potential is amenable to exact solution. The solutions are similar and tunnel corrections can be substantial. In both the Bell and Eckart cases one is implicitly assuming separability of the reaction coordinate (MEP) from all other modes over the total extent of the barrier, and this assumption will carry through to more sophisticated approaches. 

Many rate constants in aqueous solutions are pH or pD sensitive. In particular, enzyme catalyzed reactions often show maxima in plots of pH(pD) vs. rate. The example in Fig. 11.5 is constructed for a reaction with a true isotope effect, kH/kD = 2, and with maxima in the pH(pD)/rate dependences as shown by the bell shaped curves. These behaviors are typical for enzyme catalyzed reactions. When the isotope effect is obtained (incorrectly) by comparing rates at equal pH and pD, the values plotted along the steep dashed curve result. If, however, the rate constants at corresponding pH and pD (pD = pH + 0.5) are employed, a constant and correct value is obtained, kH/kD = 2. Thus for accurate measurements of the isotope effects one must control pH and pD at appropriate values (pD = pH + 0.5 in our example) using a series of buffers. In proton inventory experiments (see below) buffers should be employed to insure equivalent acidities across the entire range of solvent isotope concentration (0 < xD < 1), xD is the atom fraction of deuterium [D]/([H] + [D]). 

Fig. 11.5 Rate constants in HOH and DOD as a function of pL (two bottom bell shaped curves) for an enzyme catalyzed reaction with three protomeric forms and an isotope effect of 2. L is the H+ or D+ concentration as appropriate. The steep curve shows the erroneously calculated isotope effect from the rate constants at pH = pD. The correct flat line is calculated taking the IE s at corresponding pL (pD = pH + 0.5) (Schowen, R. L. J. Label Compd Radiopharm. 50, 1052 (2007), with permission Wiley Interscience)...

---