Behavioral studies invertebrates

The behavior of invertebrate and plant GDH s has been less extensively studied than that of the bovine enzyme. The question of compulsory order as opposed to random order binding, which has been resolved only with great difficulty for bovine GDH, has been investigated with only a few other GDH s. In each case, for Phycomycetes GDH (NAD) (S3S), GDH (NADP) of Brevibacterium flavum 30), soybean GDH (NAD), 7), and both the NAD- and NADP-dependent GDH s of Thio-bacillus novellm (33), compulsory order binding has been reported in which coenzyme binds first and NH4+ last. However, since the more refined methods employed for investigation of the mechanism of bovine GDH have not been applied to any of these systems, the question of random vs. ordered mechanism cannot be said to have been resolved, particularly since the methods thus far employed did not give decisive results with bovine GDH. 

Speaking generally, many laboratory studies have shown behavioral effects in vertebrates or invertebrates or both exposed to organochlorine, carbamate, OP, pyre-throid, and neonicotinoid insecticides. However, the critical questions are (1) to what extent have these effects been demonstrated at normal levels of exposure in the field and (2), if such effects have occurred in the field, have there been knock-on effects at the population level These issues will be returned to in Section 16.7. 

Although there is a considerable amount known about the effects of prey chemicals on predator feeding preferences, much less is known about the proximate or ultimate reasons why marine invertebrates avoid certain compounds. Even when compounds cause behavioral avoidance of a food, few studies have assessed how consumption of prey secondary metabolites affects the physiology (and ultimately the fitness) of invertebrate consumers. Two basic approaches have been used (1) comparing effects of natural prey items which naturally contain or lack various secondary metabolites, or (2) comparing the effects of artificially prepared diets with and without metabolites. Studies of the first group108 109 have been able to correlate metabolite presence with certain effects on consumers, but the effects of secondary metabolites are confounded by other traits (e.g., protein,... 

Almost a decade before the term pheromone was coined, Roth and Willis (1952) conducted seminal experiments that characterized volatile and contact pheromones in cockroaches. Louis Roth s research integrated studies of endocrinology and behavior, and the influence of this approach was reflected in Barth s early articulation of the interplay between the endocrine system and sexual behavior. In later years cockroaches continued to serve as important models for invertebrate endocrinology (Scharrer, 1987 Tobe and Stay, 1985), but research on pheromones lagged, in part due to technical difficulties in sex pheromone identification. Below, we highlight some of the many issues yet to be resolved in the physiological and behavioral regulation of sex pheromone production and emission in cockroaches. 

Many of the studies on prostaglandins have been made using either a bioassay, immunoassay, sometimes with the enzyme cyclooxygenase, or using injected or added arachidonic acid or an eicosanoid, so the evidence for a prostaglandin is sometimes indirect. This has sometimes led to a mis-identification.1 0 Both GC—MS and LC—MS have been used for direct identification. Typically identifications are based upon mass spectra, tandem MS (MS/MS), UV spectra, and chromatographic behavior.134 Recent ESI—MS/MS linked to HPLC has provided detection over the range 0.5—50 pg and quantification from 2 to 100 pg.135 Eicosanoids in invertebrates, other than insects, have been reviewed recently.133... 

In this chapter we used the well-studied water louse A. aquaticus as an example. Although some life cycle characteristics of this species, like age and number of offspring, are known from detailed studies, others, like density dependence and walking behavior, are not. We therefore need more research concentrating on the life cycle and movement patterns of invertebrates. If flying insects are included as well, nonconnected water bodies should also be included, so the model becomes a metapopulation model in the classical sense. Adding more life cycles and more complex landscape features will make MASTEP a tool that allows the results of microcosm and mesocosm experiments to be extrapolated to the landscape level. This would allow better regulatory decisions to be made on acceptability of effects, as a more realistic description of recovery is obtained than that provided by the microcosm and mesocosm experiments alone. 

---