B Interaction parameter

In 1972, L.A. Bromley had published a paper in which he demonstrated that the 3 or B interaction parameter of Guggenheim s extended Debye-Hiickel equation may be approximated by summing S values for the individual ions for uni-univalent solutions ... 

Blends of various homopolymers with AMS-AN copolymers were systanatically examined for miscibility and phase separation temperatures in cases where LCST behavior was detected. The experimental data was used to calculate the interaction energy using the Sanchez-Lacombe lattice fluid equation of state theory. The analysis assumes that the experimental phase separation temperatures are represented using the spinodal curve and that the bare interaction energy density AP was found to be independent of temperature. Any dependence on the B interaction parameter with temperature stems frtrni compressibility effects. AP was determined as a function of cqxtlymer composition. AP,y values obtained for blends of the various homopolymers with AMS-AN copolymers woe then compared with corresponding ones obtained from SAN copolymers. Hwy-Huggins values were calculated from the experimental miscibility limits using the binary interaction model for comparison with AP,y values. 

A series of numerical simulations were also conducted, in which, in addition to the masses and the number of atoms of A, the A-A and A-B interaction parameters also differed in temperature, deformation rate, and initial conditions,. As in the experiments with a single-component system [71], the deformation first emerged in the elastic region, followed by the formation and accumulation of defects. The subsequent restructuring of the lattice was accompanied by stress relaxation. 

The parameters in simple potential models for interactions between unlike molecules A and B are often deduced from tlie corresponding parameters for the A-A and B-B interactions using combination mles . For example, the a and e parameters are often estimated from the Lorentz-Berthelot mles ... 

Figure 8.3 Volume fraction polymer in equilibrium phases for chains of different length, (a) Theoretical curves drawn for the indicated value of n, with the interaction parameter as the ordinate. Note that x increases downward. (Redrawn from Ref. 6.) (b) Experimental curves for the molecular weights indicated, with temperature as the ordinate. [Reprinted with permission from A. R. Shultz and P. J. Flory, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74 4760 (1952), copyright 1952 by the American Chemical Society.]...

There are many examples known where a random copolymer Al, comprised of monomers 1 and 2, is miscible with a homopolymer B, comprised of monomer 3, even though neither homopolymer 1 or 2 is miscible with homopolymer 3, as illustrated by Table 2. The binary interaction model offers a relatively simple explanation for the increased likelihood of random copolymers forming miscible blends with other polymers. The overall interaction parameter for such blends can be shown (eg, by simplifying eq. 8) to have the form of equation 9 (133—134). 

When i = J, all equations reduce to the appropriate values for a pure species. When i j, these equations define a set of interaction parameters having no physical significance. For a mixture, values of By and dBjj/dT from Eqs. (4-212) and (4-213) are substituted into Eqs. (4-183) and (4-185) to provide values of the mixture second virial coefficient B and its temperature derivative. Values of and for the mixture are then given by Eqs. (4-193) and (4-194), and values of In i for the component fugacity coefficients are given by Eq. (4-196). 

Helfand and Tagami [75,76] introduced a model which considered the probability that a chain of polymer 1 has diffused a given distance into polymer 2 when the interactions are characterised by the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter x They predicted that at equilibrium the thickness , d c, of the interface would depend upon the interaction parameter and the mean statistical segment length, b, as follows ... 

Another type of interaction is the association of radical ions with the parent compounds. Recently (118), a theoretical study was reported on the interaction of butadiene ions with butadiene. Assuming a sandwich structure for the complex, the potential curve based on an extended Hiickel calculation for two approaching butadienes (B + B) revealed only repulsion, as expected, while the curves for B + and B + B" interactions exhibit shallow minima (.068 and. 048 eV) at an interplanar distance of about 3.4 A. From CNDO/2 calculations, adopting the parameter set of Wiberg (161), the dimer cation radical, BJ, appears to be. 132 eV more stable than the separate B and B species, whereas the separate B and B species are favored by. 116eV over the dimer anion radical, BJ. This finding is consistent with experimental results formation of the dimer cation radical was proved in a convincing manner (162) while the attempts to detect the dimer anion radical have been unsuccessful. With other hydrocarbons, the reported formation of benzene dimer anion radical (163) represents an exceptional case, while the dimeric cation radical was observed... 

This stipulation of the interaction parameter to be equal to 0.5 at the theta temperature is found to hold with values of Xh and Xs equal to 0.5 - x < 2.7 x lO-s, and this value tends to decrease with increasing temperature. The values of = 308.6 K were found from the temperature dependence of the interaction parameter for gelatin B. Naturally, determination of the correct theta temperature of a chosen polymer/solvent system has a great physic-chemical importance for polymer solutions thermodynamically. It is quite well known that the second viiial coefficient can also be evaluated from osmometry and light scattering measurements which consequently exhibits temperature dependence, finally yielding the theta temperature for the system under study. However, the evaluation of second virial... 

At each point on the critical locus Equations 40a and b are satisfied when the true values of the binary interaction parameters and the state variables, Tc, Pc and xc are used. As a result, following an implicit formulation, one may attempt to minimize the following residuals. 

Figure 14. The phase diagram of the gradient copolymer melt with the distribution functions g(x) = l — tanh(ciit(x —fo)) shown in the insert of this figure for ci = 3,/o = 0.5 (solid line), and/o — 0.3 (dashed line), x gives the position of ith monomer from the end of the chain in the units of the linear chain length. % is the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter, N is a polymerization index, and/ is the composition (/ = J0 g(x) dx). The Euler characteristic of the isotropic phase (I) is zero, and that of the hexagonal phase (H) is zero. For the bcc phase (B), XEuier = 4 per unit cell for the double gyroid phase (G), XEuier = -16 per unit cell and for the lamellar phases (LAM), XEuier = 0.

---