Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Available energy expressions, evaluation

Transport Relationships. The following expressions are used to evaluate the transports, A n and Aout, of available energy. [Pg.19]

Evaluation of Available Energy Transport Expressions. Available energy transport relations are seen to be products of thermostatic properties with commodity currents. Given the commodity currents, the available energy transports can then be evaluated by determining the thermostatic properties, using traditional thermochemical property evaluation techniques. References (6) and (7) present convenient relationships for practical evaluation of available energy flows for several important cases. [Pg.21]

Available energy trainsported with the gas will be evaluated as three independent contributions thermal, pressure, emd chemical. The chainge in total available energy content of the gas may be expressed... [Pg.190]

Figure 19 Numerical methods available for the evaluation of 4). The expressions rely on specific approximations, as discussed in detail in the main body of the text. Here A is the energy difference between the mutated and the wild-type protein, is the probability of contact formation for the ij pair in state L, and (N) is the ensemble average number of native contacts in state L (unfolded, native, or transition). The remaining terms have been introduced in the previous figures. Figure 19 Numerical methods available for the evaluation of 4). The expressions rely on specific approximations, as discussed in detail in the main body of the text. Here A is the energy difference between the mutated and the wild-type protein, is the probability of contact formation for the ij pair in state L, and (N) is the ensemble average number of native contacts in state L (unfolded, native, or transition). The remaining terms have been introduced in the previous figures.
There are no large differences between the reactivities of PhS , (EtO)2PO and CHjCOCHj" with the same aryl radical, but CN appears to be significantly less reactive. It is not easy to evaluate the respective role of the bond dissociation free energy and of the Nu-/Nu" standard potential in equation (13) in this connection because of the paucity of available data concerning these two quantities. An explanation of the low reactivity of CN" should thus await the availability of such data as well as that of a precise expression of the intrinsic barrier in a model of these intramolecular concerted electron-transfer-bond-breaking (or forming) reactions. [Pg.93]

Note that the conventional TST expression is simply the special case of VTST where evaluation is done exclusively for s = 0. As such, the VTST rate constant will always be less than or equal to the conventional TST rate constant (equal in the event that s = 0 minimizes Eq. (15.35)). Put differently, when very accurate potential energy surfaces are available, the conventional TST rate constant is typically an overestimate of the exact classical rate constant. (Note that it is possible, however, for a compensating or even offsetting error to arise from overestimation of the barrier height if the potential energy surface is not very accurate.)... [Pg.532]

As well as departure from octahedral symmetry of the tetragonal type discussed above, angular distortions in which M—L bond lengths are preserved unchanged present a fairly obvious case for the application of the AOM. An octahedron squashed or elongated in the C3 axis is an example. In the resultant D3d symmetry the -orbitals are split into three sets, one of symmetry alg and two of symmetry eg. In fact, the expressions for and (p = alg or eg) in terms of the angle of distortion are not simple and the existence of two sets of the same symmetry label creates complications. However, it is readily shown that it is a two-parameter problem in the AOM, eG and en, the same level as for LFT (see equation 9). In principle, the two energy separations available should allow the evaluation of both parameters. [Pg.230]

Here oq is the polarizability of molecule J, I(J) is the ionization energy of molecule J from its ground state, and all other symbols have the same meaning as in Eq. (1.2.4). No general analytic expressions are available for the bond component (fcbonl ). When such a component exists one has to evaluate it by doing quantum chemical calculations [24, 31] on the appropriate models. [Pg.39]

With regard to evaluations of availability changes (of either feedstocks or energy sources) we note that they require knowledge of the thermophysical properties and the initial and end states of the materials involved in the task. Such evaluations can be tedious. But in some widely used processes, a change in availability can be expressed as a product of a quality factor times the appropriate energy change, where the quality factor is a simple or tabulated function of some characteristic thermodynamic variable. Thus, the absolute thermodynamic efficiency ri can be written in the form (2)... [Pg.62]


See other pages where Available energy expressions, evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.213]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.825]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.1829]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.1588]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.309]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.21 ]




SEARCH



Energy availability

Energy available

Energy evaluations

Energy expression

© 2024 chempedia.info