Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Atomic orbitals rotation coefficients

The mathematics can be applied directly to generate linear combinations over resultant local functions modulated by calculated coefficients in order to construct all the possible group orbitals for an orbit decorated with valence atomic orbitals, or the mathematics can be applied to generate only one half of the number of possible linear combinations over resultant local functions, while the remaining group orbitals are obtained from these by concerted local rotations of the local resultants of the first set, or... [Pg.108]

The hybridization scheme in valence bond theory is a very useful concept for chemists since it permits a localized view of the bonding. The most general method for generating hybridized orbitals is based on defining a bond wavefunction (a linear combination of atomic orbitals) in a specific bond direction (usually the z-axis direction). Then the second and subsequent hybrids are obtained by a rotation transformation. Orthogonality conditions are then used to evaluate the hybrid coefficients. These bond wavefunctions are defined as equivalent because they differ from one another only by a rotation. Generally, the first bond wavefunction is... [Pg.74]

As in Eqs. (4.22e) and (4.28), p, here denotes a 2p orbital centered on atom t, Cj is the expansion coefficient for this atomic orbital in molecular wavefunction Pa, and r is the position vector in a coordinate system with its otigm at the center of the rotation. To examine the ways that the expression in Eq. (9.4) can give a non-zero magnetic transition dipole, it is helpful to write the position vector r in the integral... [Pg.385]

Thus, a rule of thumb says that valid normal coordinates must be either entirely symmetric or entirely antisymmetric over the most common symmetry operations if m and n label any two internal coordinates related by symmetry, then either Ukm = cikn or akm = —akn- This rule of thumb holds also in the construction of the coefficients of atomic orbitals in molecular orbitals (see Section 3.5). The bending mode of water straddles the mirror plane and is already symmetry-adapted if the displacements of the two hydrogen atoms are equal and in opposite directions (if the motions were in the same direction, that would be a molecular rotation, not a vibration). [Pg.32]

Using the same procedure, the rotation coefficients for all atomic orbitals can readily be evaluated. For the p orbitals, these are given in Table 3, for the d orbitals in Table 4, and for... [Pg.1354]

By method is meant the set of approximations used. These approximations must satisfy several criteria. Some criteria are theoretic if any of these are violated, then the method is not a valid one. For example, the results must be rotationally invariant This means that the results of a calculation should not depend on the orientation of the system in Cartesian space. Here results refers to any scalar ob.servable, such as the heat of formation, dipole moment, or interatomic distance or angle. (Some results are not observables, an example of which would be the molecular orbitals or eigenvectors, which are composed of a linear combination of atomic orbitals. Since the atomic orbitals are defined in terms of the Cartesian coordinate system, the coefficients of those atomic orbitals, which have angular dependence, will change as the system is rotated.) This is a rigorous and essential criterion, and all semiempirical methods in current use pass this test. Another theoretical requirement is that the results of a calculation on two well-separated (i.e., noninteracting) systems should be the sum of the results of calculations of the two isolated systems. [Pg.2081]

The scheme we employ uses a Cartesian laboratory system of coordinates which avoids the spurious small kinetic and Coriolis energy terms that arise when center of mass coordinates are used. However, the overall translational and rotational degrees of freedom are still present. The unconstrained coupled dynamics of all participating electrons and atomic nuclei is considered explicitly. The particles move under the influence of the instantaneous forces derived from the Coulombic potentials of the system Hamiltonian and the time-dependent system wave function. The time-dependent variational principle is used to derive the dynamical equations for a given form of time-dependent system wave function. The choice of wave function ansatz and of sets of atomic basis functions are the limiting approximations of the method. Wave function parameters, such as molecular orbital coefficients, z,(f), average nuclear positions and momenta, and Pfe(0, etc., carry the time dependence and serve as the dynamical variables of the method. Therefore, the parameterization of the system wave function is important, and we have found that wave functions expressed as generalized coherent states are particularly useful. A minimal implementation of the method [16,17] employs a wave function of the form ... [Pg.49]

Such a distribution has a plausible physical basis, since the driving force for phenyl rotation into the porphyrin plane provided by the electronic excitation (the eg orbital has particularly large coefficients at the meso carbon atoms ( )) encounters steric resistance from the non-bonded interactions between the protons at the ortho positions of the phenyl groups and those on the outer pyrrole carbon atoms (20). Consequently the phenyl torsion potential in the excited states may be relatively flat. Nevertheless, the vibrational frequencies are expected to be sensitive to the torsion angle for orientation close to co-planar because of the effect of conjugation. [Pg.258]

Coefficients Rlx form an orthogonal matrix iC transforming the (/-orbitals under rotation of the laboratory coordinate frame (LCF) to the local coordinate frame related to the ligand / and constructed such that its Oz axis is going through the metal atom and the ligand atom (DCF - diatomic coordinate frame). The perturbation caused by the ligand has a matrix representation elxx, in the DCF with A = a,7r(x),n(y), 5 xy), S(x2 - y2). These quantities are considered parameters of the AOM. [Pg.150]

In the previous section we used quaternions to construct a convenient parameterization of the hybridization manifold, using the fact that it can be supplied by the 50(4) group structure. However, the strictly local HOs allow for the quaternion representation for themselves. Indeed, the quaternion was previously characterized as an entity comprising a scalar and a 3-vector part h = (h0, h) = (s, v). This notation reflects the symmetry properties of the quaternion under spatial rotation its first component ho = s does not change under spatial rotation i.e. is a scalar, whereas the vector part h — v — (hx,hy,hz) expectedly transforms as a 3-vector. These are precisely the features which can be easily found by the strictly local HOs the coefficient of the s-orbital in the HO s expansion over AOs does not change under the spatial rotation of the molecule, whereas the coefficients at the p-functions transform as if they were the components of a 3-dimensional vector. Thus each of the HOs located at a heavy atom and assigned to the m-th bond can be presented as a quaternion ... [Pg.226]

The SOC operator contains the product of a term that acts on the spin part of a wavefunction, converting a triplet function to a singlet function and a term that acts on the space part of the wavefunction, changing one electronic configuration to another. Each component of the SOC vector, < So /z so T >, u = x, y or z, is a sum over all atoms and each atom contributes a sum over pairs of all basis set orbitals in the molecule. The terms in the sum are multiplied by numerical coefficients obtained from the Cl expansion and from the coefficients of the valence (primarily p-) orbitals in the two singly occupied MOs ofTj. The dominant contributors to the sum are those in which both basis set orbitals are located on the same atom ( one-centre terms ). Each term reflects the degree to which a 90° rotation around the axis u through the atom converts one member of the orbital pair into the other. If the space part of the wavefunctions differs only by the occupation number of two MOs ij/i and ij/j, we need to consider only the three matrix elements <... [Pg.173]


See other pages where Atomic orbitals rotation coefficients is mentioned: [Pg.109]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.708]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.2055]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.2055]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.381]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.1354 ]




SEARCH



Orbital coefficient

Orbital rotation

Rotation coefficients

© 2024 chempedia.info