Atomic orbitals order

HMO theory is named after its developer, Erich Huckel (1896-1980), who published his theory in 1930 [9] partly in order to explain the unusual stability of benzene and other aromatic compounds. Given that digital computers had not yet been invented and that all Hiickel s calculations had to be done by hand, HMO theory necessarily includes many approximations. The first is that only the jr-molecular orbitals of the molecule are considered. This implies that the entire molecular structure is planar (because then a plane of symmetry separates the r-orbitals, which are antisymmetric with respect to this plane, from all others). It also means that only one atomic orbital must be considered for each atom in the r-system (the p-orbital that is antisymmetric with respect to the plane of the molecule) and none at all for atoms (such as hydrogen) that are not involved in the r-system. Huckel then used the technique known as linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) to build these atomic orbitals up into molecular orbitals. This is illustrated in Figure 7-18 for ethylene. 

We have assumed that the order of the subscripts on the atomic orbitals p is immaterial in writing a, p, and S. In the general case, these assumptions are not self-evident, especially for p. The interested reader should consult a good quantum mechanics text (e.g., Hanna, 1981 McQuarrie, 1983 Atkins and Eriedman, 1997) for their justification or critique. 

Section 1 1 A review of some fundamental knowledge about atoms and electrons leads to a discussion of wave functions, orbitals, and the electron con figurations of atoms Neutral atoms have as many electrons as the num ber of protons m the nucleus These electrons occupy orbitals m order of increasing energy with no more than two electrons m any one orbital The most frequently encountered atomic orbitals m this text are s orbitals (spherically symmetrical) and p orbitals ( dumbbell shaped)... 

MOs around them - rather as we construct atomic orbitals (AOs) around a single bare nucleus. Electrons are then fed into the MOs in pairs (with the electron spin quantum number = 5) in order of increasing energy using the aufbau principle, just as for atoms (Section 7.1.1), to give the ground configuration of the molecule. 

Figure 7.14 Molecular orbital energy level diagram for first-row homonuclear diatomic molecules. The 2p, 2py, 2p atomic orbitals are degenerate in an atom and have been separated for convenience. (In O2 and F2 the order of

The atomic orbital contributions for each atom in the molecule are given for each molecular orbital, numbered in order of increasing energy (the MO s energy is given in the row labeled EIGENVALUES preceding the orbital coefficients). The symmetry of the orbital and whether it is an occupied orbital or a virtual (unoccupied) orbital appears immediately under the orbital number. 

Compared to the overlap of the undistorted atomic orbitals used in the HL wave function, which is just 5ab. it is seen that the overlap is increased (c is positive), i.e. the orbitals distort so that they overlap better in order to make a bond. Although the distortion is fairly small (a few %) this effectively eliminates the need for including ionic VB terms. When c is variationally optimized, the MO-CI, VB-HL and VB-CF wave functions (eqs. (7.4), (7.7) and (7.8)) are all completely equivalent. The MO approach incorporates the flexibility in terms of an excited determinant, the VB-FIL in terms of ionic structures, and the VB-CF in terms of distorted atomic orbitals. 

Relative energies, so far as filling order is concerned, for the molecular orbitals formed by combining 2s and 2p atomic orbitals. 

For purposes of illustration, consider a lithium crystal weighing one gram, which contains roughly 1023 atoms. Each Li atom has a half-filled 2s atomic orbital (elect conf. Li = ls22s1). When these atomic orbitals combine, they form an equal number, 1023, of molecular orbitals. These orbitals are spread over an energy band covering about 100 kJ/moL It follows that the spacing between adjacent MOs is of the order of... 

During the endeavor to understand and explain the PT physically, a lot of effort has been spent on secondary problems. Even worse, an orbital ordering rule that has no general validity, has been assumed to be of central relevance. It has often been said that the structure of the neutral atoms is of primary importance for the periodic system. This is true, though in a modified sense ([34], p 653). 

In molecular applications the calculation of the HF energy is a still more difficult problem. It should be observed that, in the SCF-MO-LCAO now commonly in use, one does not determine the exact HF functions but only the best approximation to these functions obtainable within the framework given by the ordinarily occupied AO s. Since the set of these atomic orbitals is usually very far from being complete, the approximation may come out rather poor, and the correlation energy estimated from such a calculation may then turn out to be much too large in absolute order of magnitude. The best calculation so far is perhaps Coulson s treatment of... 

To describe atoms with several electrons, one has to consider the interaction between the electrons, adding to the Hamiltonian a term of the form Ei< . Despite this complication it is common to use an approximate wave function which is a product of hydrogen-like atomic orbitals. This is done by taking the orbitals in order of increasing energy and assigning no more than two electrons per orbital. 

The wave function, constructed from the atomic orbitals must be antisymmetric with respect to interchange of electrons in order to satisfy the Pauli exclusion principle, having different spin quantum numbers (a and J3) for two electrons which are in the same orbital. 

In order to obtain an approximate solution to eq. (1.9) we can take advantage of the fact that for large R and small rA, one basically deals with a hydrogen atom perturbed by a bare nucleus. This situation can be described by the hydrogen-like atomic orbital y100 located on atom A. Similarly, the case with large R and small rB can be described by y100 on atom B. Thus it is reasonable to choose a linear combination of the atomic orbitals f00 and f00 as our approximate wave function. Such a combination is called a molecular orbital (MO) and is written as... 

When N valence atomic orbitals overlap, they form N molecular orbitals. The ground-state electron configuration of a molecule is deduced by using the building-up principle to accommodate all the valence electrons in the available molecular orbitals. The bond order is the net number of bonds that hold the molecule together. 

The ground-state electron configurations of diatomic molecules are deduced by forming molecular orbitals from all the valence-sbell atomic orbitals of the two atoms and adding the valence electrons to the molecular orbitals in order of increasing energy, in accord ivith the building-up principle. 

In order to explain the observed saturation ferromagnetic moment of Fe, 2.22/xb, I assumed that the Fe atom in the metal has two kinds of 3d orbitals 2.22 atomic (contracted) orbitals, and 2.78 bonding 3d orbitals, which can hybridize with 4s and 4p to form bond orbitals. Thus 2.22 of the 8 outer electrons could occupy the atomic orbitals to provide the ferromagnetic moment, with the other 5.78 outer electrons forming 5.78 covalent bonds. 

The complex contains 72 atoms with 244 valence electrons distributed in 226 valence atomic orbitals. In order to reduce the computational effort, and to assess the contribution of the ligand 7r-orbitals to the overall spectrum, we examined a "reduced" model, see Figure 2, in which the benzene rings of the ligands are replaced by -HC=CH- groups. This model compound consists of... 

A special aspect of this description appears if one starts the orbital optimisation process with orbitals obtained by linear combinations ofRHF orbitals of the isolated atoms (LCAO approximation s.str.). Let Pn.opt and be the starting and final orbitals of such a calculation. Then the difference between c n.opi and Papt in the vicinity of each atom merely consists in a distortion of the atomic orbitals of each atom. This distortion just compensates the contribution of the orbitals of the other atoms to Pn.ctpt in order to restore the proportionality between the partial waves of ipopi and the appropriate atomic orbital. 

The calculation performed for the metastable N (ls2s) + He system has necessitated somewhat larger Cl spaces (200-250 determinants) in order to reach the same perturbation threshold ri = 0.01, the la molecular orbital being not frozen for this calculation.The basis of atomic orbitals has been also expanded to a 10s6p3d basis of gaussian functions for nitrogen reoptimized on N (ls ) for the s exponents and on N (ls 2p) for the p exponents and added of one s and one p diffuse functions [22]. For such excited states,... 

---