Electron-atom interaction

For his experimental work on the photoelec hie effect, Millikan was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics in 1923. Others whose contributions to the understanding of radiation led to Nobel Prizes in physics include Wilhelm Wien in 1911 for heat radiation laws, Planck in 1918 for the quantum concept, Johannes Stark in 1919 for spec rial properties, Einstein in 1921 in part for interpreting the photoelectric effect, Niels Bohr in 1922 for atomic radiation, James Franck and Gustav Hertz in 1925 for atom-electron interactions, and Wo If gang Pauli in 1945 for atomic properties. 

Particular interest attaches to two distinct special cases C= 1, corresponding to Uh = 0 there are no intra-atomic electron interactions. Then... 

Electrons interact with solid surfaces by elastic and inelastic scattering, and these interactions are employed in electron spectroscopy. For example, electrons that elastically scatter will diffract from a single-crystal lattice. The diffraction pattern can be used as a means of stnictural detenuination, as in FEED. Electrons scatter inelastically by inducing electronic and vibrational excitations in the surface region. These losses fonu the basis of electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). An incident electron can also knock out an iimer-shell, or core, electron from an atom in the solid that will, in turn, initiate an Auger process. Electrons can also be used to induce stimulated desorption, as described in section Al.7.5.6. 

This gives the total energy, which is also the kinetic energy in this case because the potential energy is zero within the box , m tenns of the electron density p x,y,z) = (NIL ). It therefore may be plausible to express kinetic energies in tenns of electron densities p(r), but it is by no means clear how to do so for real atoms and molecules with electron-nuclear and electron-electron interactions operative. 

One of the limitations of HF calculations is that they do not include electron correlation. This means that HF takes into account the average affect of electron repulsion, but not the explicit electron-electron interaction. Within HF theory the probability of finding an electron at some location around an atom is determined by the distance from the nucleus but not the distance to the other electrons as shown in Figure 3.1. This is not physically true, but it is the consequence of the central field approximation, which defines the HF method. 

The neglect of electron-electron interactions in the Extended Hiickel model has several consequences. For example, the atomic orbital binding energies are fixed and do not depend on charge density. With the more accurate NDO semi-empirical treatments, these energies are appropriately sensitive to the surrounding molecular environment. 

The Extended Hiickel method neglects all electron-electron interactions. More accurate calculations are possible with HyperChem by using methods that neglect some, but not all, of the electron-electron interactions. These methods are called Neglect of Differential Overlap or NDO methods. In some parts of the calculation they neglect the effects of any overlap density between atomic orbitals. This reduces the number of electron-electron interaction integrals to calculate, which would otherwise be too time-consuming for all but the smallest molecules. 

The two-center two-electron repulsion integrals ( AV Arr) represents the energy of interaction between the charge distributions at atom Aand at atom B. Classically, they are equal to the sum over all interactions between the multipole moments of the two charge contributions, where the subscripts I and m specify the order and orientation of the multipole. MNDO uses the classical model in calculating these two-center two-electron interactions. 

Each two-electron integral is the sum of all the terms arising from the charge distribution representative of the first pair of atomic orbitals interacting with the charge distribution representative of the second pair of atomic orbitals. Thus in the simplest case, the (ssiss) interaction is represented by the repulsion of two monopoles, while a (pj pjjlp jjp jj), a much more complicated interaction,... 

Electrons and photons do not impact molecules or atoms. They interact with them in ways that result in various electronic excitations, including ionization. For this reason it is recommended that the terms electron impact and photon impact be avoided. 

Range. Nuclear interactions consist of individual elastic coUisions between ion and target atom nuclei, whereas the electronic interactions can be... 

In almost all cases X is unaffected by any changes in the physical and chemical conditions of the radionucHde. However, there are special conditions that can influence X. An example is the decay of Be that occurs by the capture of an atomic electron by the nucleus. Chemical compounds are formed by interactions between the outer electrons of the atoms in the compound, and different compounds have different electron wave functions for these outer electrons. Because Be has only four electrons, the wave functions of the electrons involved in the electron-capture process are influenced by the chemical bonding. The change in the Be decay constant for different compounds has been measured, and the maximum observed change is about 0.2%. 

Representative chemical shifts from the large amount of available data on isothiazoles are included in Table 4. The chemical shifts of the ring hydrogens depend on electron density, ring currents and substituent anisotropies, and substituent effects can usually be predicted, at least qualitatively, by comparison with other aromatic systems. The resonance of H(5) is usually at a lower field than that of H(3) but in some cases this order is reversed. As is discussed later (Section 4.17.3.4) the chemical shift of H(5) is more sensitive to substitution in the 4-position than is that of H(3), and it is also worth noting that the resonance of H(5) is shifted downfield (typically 0.5 p.p.m.) when DMSO is used as solvent, a reflection of the ability of this hydrogen atom to interact with proton acceptors. This matter is discussed again in Section 4.17.3.7. 

---