Assembly structure with three levels

Entities of type ASSEMBLY may not be nested. The only hierarchy allowed is 

---

Inspired by the beauty and efficiency with which Nature controls macroscopic three-dimensional space as seen in the branching networks of trees [58], coral [59], and physiological structures [60, 61], one of us (D.A.T.) sought to mimic such branched assemblies at the molecular level. Analysis of parameters involved in synthetically mimicking such branching included the following hypothetical steps (see Fig. 9) ... 

Point defects are changes at atomistic levels, while line and volume defects are changes in stacking of planes or groups of atoms (molecules) m the structure. Note that the curangement (structure) of the individual atoms (ions) are not affected, only the method in which the structure units are assembled. Let us now examine each of these three types of defects in more detail, starting with the one-dimensional lattice defect amd then with the multi-dimensional defects. We will find that specific types have been found to be associated with each t3rpe of dimensional defect which have specific effects upon the stability of the solid structure. 

There are two levels of self-assembly in the formation of tetra-, penta-and hexa-nuclear products from the poly-bipyridyls (L) 20 and 21 and iron(II) salts FeCl2, FeBr2 or FeS04 - the products are anion-dependent. The coordination of three bpy units, from different ligand molecules, to the Fe2+ centers produces a helical structure interaction of these helical strands with anions results in further molecular organization to form the final toroidal product. The discussion draws parallels between the helical and toroidal structures here and secondary and tertiary structure in biological systems (482). Thermodynamic and kinetic intermediates have been characterized in the self-assembly of a di-iron triple stranded helicate with bis(2,2/-bipyridyl) ligands (483). 

Since 1974, evidence has accumulated in the literature which indicates that chromatin itself may be considered as an assembly system. It is true that chromatin is more complex than assembly systems analyzed to date, both with respect to the size of the nucleic acid involved and therefore the amount (and variety) of protein complexed with it and with respect to the dynamic aspect of the multilevel higher order structure. Nevertheless, at least at the lower levels of organization, the interpretation of chromatin as an assembly system may be valid. Evidence for this derives from three basic lines of research described in previous sections (1) the reconstitution of the nucleosome, (2) the self-assembly of the octamer, and (3) the putative self-organization of nucleosomes into higher order structures. 

---