Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Array Arguments

Each of the next two versions of the example program uses a subroutine to do some of the work. The subroutine is named Summer and is declared as follows  [Pg.40]

The dummy parameters N, Nums, and Avg do not appear in a Dim statement. They inherit the data type and structure of the actual argument when the subroutine is called. The calling statement in the next two examples is [Pg.40]

The empty parentheses after InputNumbers identify it as an array argument, and the dummy Nums becomes an array structure of whatever length InputNumbers happens to be. These parentheses are not essential but they help to document the array argument. [Pg.40]

The same program is changed again, this time using a Sub with arguments to perform the summing and averaging operations  [Pg.41]

DlSL ANuzober As Double A numbex obtained frcm the spreadsheet [Pg.41]


In this chapter, the current approximation function Q, defined in Chap. 3, (3.25), will be used extensively. Note also that since this function is a linear combination of the array argument (for example, C as in Q(C,n. H)), the function of a weighted sum of two arrays, such as the arrays u and v (to be met later), the following holds (a being some scalar factor) ... [Pg.85]

QuaHtative arguments deal primarily with the sense of ownership and security which result from individually owned generation systems. Additional complexity will arise from the aesthetic criteria specific to both individual homes and the surrounding community. Of course, the autonomy inherent in distributed rooftop arrays probably constitutes an institutional barrier to their acceptance by some utiHty companies, unless they are involved in the financing and/or marketing chain. [Pg.475]

This type of argument leads us to picture a metal as an array of positive ions located at the crystal lattice sites, immersed in a sea of mobile electrons. The idea of a more or less uniform electron sea emphasizes an important difference between metallic bonding and ordinary covalent bonding. In molecular covalent bonds the electrons are localized in a way that fixes the positions of the atoms quite rigidly. We say that the bonds have directional character— the electrons tend to remain concentrated in certain regions of space. In contrast, the valence electrons in a metal are spread almost uniformly throughout the crystal, so the metallic bond does not exert the directional influence of the ordinary covalent bond. [Pg.304]

Statement duplicated (DYNAMIC, OUTPUT, PLOT or PREPARE. Wrong number of arguments in PLOT (should be 6) or too many arguments in OUTPUT, SUBROUTINE, FUNCTION or ARRAY. (OUTPUT limited to 10, others to 15). [Pg.688]

Wrong number of arguments in subroutine or function or of subscripts in an array or an illegal GOTO i.e. to a label in another region. [Pg.689]

A reserved variable, or a dummy argument of a function, or a variable set by an earlier CONSTANT statement has been redefined as an array. [Pg.689]

We need the brackets inside because the argument to the axis function is an array. [Pg.220]

The preceding argument works also for the T i hypersurface, but exactly in the opposite sense. Now loose geometries are more favorable and this is where the biradicaloid minima should be sought (for instance, 2, not 4). These minima in Ti will typically allow considerable freedom of motion such as bond rotation, since there now is no rigid geometrical requirement such as a need for a cyclic array of orbitals was in the singlet case. Also, return to So is spin-forbidden and may be relatively slow,... [Pg.47]

As for vectors, the selection is specified within square brackets []. For selecting rows and columns of a matrix, two arguments have to be provided, separated by a comma, e.g. [rows,columns). Analogously, for arrays, the selections in the different ways of the array are specified as separate arguments, e.g. way I, way2, way3. ... [Pg.324]

Moreover, the Relative Size argument also applies to those divalent iodides which are approximately close-packed arrays of iodide (cp. Wyckoff 24)). The following table shows for such compounds the gram-formula weights, the X-ray determined densities, and hence the volume Vanion (cc/gm/atom) occupied by the iodide gram/ion, which has a minimum value of about 28 cc. [Pg.65]

We have discussed the tanks-in-series model in the sense that the composition in the system was constant over a cross-section. Recently Deans and Lapidus (D12) devised a three-dimensional array of stirred tanks, called a finite-stage model, that was able to take radial as well as axial mixing into account. Because of the symmetry, only a two-dimensional array is needed if the stirred tanks are chosen of different sizes across the radius and are properly weighted. By a geometrical argument. Deans and Lapidus arrived at the following equation for the (i, j) tank ... [Pg.155]

From these arguments it is clear that fluorination has a corresponding effect to diminish the basicity of a compound. For simple carboxylic acids the influence of fluorination on the reduction of basicity falls off dramatically with distance (vide supra).7 6 In gas-phase studies it is apparent that diminution of basicity can be attributed to an increase in the total array of atoms, each of which bears some electron density. Nevertheless, it is clear that when fluorine is attached directly to an anionic center such as that formed by a carboxylic acid its effect is substantially destabilizing.37 40... [Pg.295]

The importance of the arguments we have outlined lies in the fact that they provide a theoretical foundation both for aromaticity-antiaromaticity and for pericyclic selection rules. They furthermore demonstrate the relationship between the two The topological equivalence between an array of p orbitals in a w system of a carbon chain or ring and a pericyclic transition state, composed of an... [Pg.608]

The nature of the transition to the metallic state is not yet well understood, but it is useful at this stage to consider the arguments presented by Mott concerning this general problem (33). In a crystalline array of atoms, as the distance between the atoms is decreased a sharp transition to the metallic state is expected to occur. For a random array, the the transition sharpness is lost because of the disordered atomic arrangement. [Pg.30]


See other pages where Array Arguments is mentioned: [Pg.102]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.216]   


SEARCH



Argument

© 2024 chempedia.info