Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Aromaticity conflicting

There are conflicting generalizations in the heterocyclic literature as to the relative reactivity of a- and y-positions in azines toward nucleophiles. Variations in the relative reactivity are attributed in this and subsequent sections to specific factors operating in addition to activation by azine-nitrogen. Another possible source of variation may be a decrease in selectivity with increasing reactivity of one or both reagents, an effect established in electrophilic aromatic... [Pg.177]

MDA is unique. Not only does it produce both types of effects, but it seems to conflict with some of the above-mentioned SARs. For example, aromatic-substituted phenalkylamines such as the 3-methoxy and 4-methoxy derivatives MMA and PMA arc only weak AMPH-like agents, and the... [Pg.52]

It appears that purification of commercially available solvents is sometimes required for the complete elimination of impurity resonances. Occasionally, these impurities may be turned into advantage, as in the case of C2D2CI4 where the (known) C2DHCI4 content may be used as an internal standard for quantitation. Thus, removal of every impurity peak is not always essential for identification and quantitative analysis of stabilisers in PE. Determination of the concentration of additives in a polymer sample can also be accomplished by incorporation of an internal NMR standard to the dissolution prepared for analysis. The internal standard (preferably aromatic) should be stable at the temperature of the NMR experiment, and could be any high-boiling compound which does not generate conflicting NMR resonances, and for which the proton spin-lattice relaxation times are known. 1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene meets the requirements for an internal NMR standard [48]. The concentration should be comparable to that of the analytes to be determined. [Pg.698]

The results from a series of early studies of the products formed from irradiation of DAX appeared to show that XA does not react with hydrocarbons or simple olefins (Reverdy, 1976a,b,c.). However, later reports (G. W. Jones et al., 1978, 1979) seemed to contradict many of these claims. Our more recent investigation of XA resolves the apparently conflicting results and provides further information on the forces that relate structure to reactivity for aromatic carbenes (Lapin and Schuster, 1985). [Pg.338]

Multifold Aromaticity, Multifold Antiaromaticity, and Conflicting Aromaticity Implications for Stability and Reactivity of Clusters... [Pg.439]

Aromaticity/antiaromaticity in cluster systems has certain peculiarities when compared with organic compounds. The striking feature of chemical bonding in cluster systems is the multifold nature of aromaticity, antiaromaticity, and conflicting aromaticity [3-10]. Double aromaticity (the simultaneous presence of [Pg.439]

Anderson and coworkers [59-66] produced boron cluster cations Bj-B in molecular beams using laser vaporization and studied their chemical reactivity and fragmentation properties. The structures of B3 —IBI3 cations have been established computationally (see review [7] for details) represented in Figure 29.1. In this chapter, we are discussing stability and reactivity of Bj — B 3 cations on the basis of their multifold aromaticity, multifold antiaromaticity, and conflicting aromaticity. [Pg.441]

The presented consideration of the family of cationic boron clusters exemplifies that the assessment of stability and reactivity of clusters can be performed at the qualitative level using multifold aromaticity, multifold antiaromaticity, and variety of conflicting aromaticities. [Pg.449]

Arguing as before, we conclude that pi nonbonded attractive interactions are maximized in the SS conformation while sigma nonbonded attractive interactions are maximized in the EE conformation. This conflict between pi and sigma nonbonded attractive interactions is similar to the conflict observed in cis 2-butene in which steric effects resulted in an apparent dominance of sigma over pi aromaticity. [Pg.101]

Aromaticity, defined as a structural feature, was used as a predictive tool for compounds that had not been prepared previously, whereas reactivity, bond length, or magnetic criteria had to await the isolation of a compound and its experimental investigation. Only recently has the development of quantum-chemical methods reached the point where one can predict with sufficient accuracy the magnetic properties, the bond lengths, and the reactivity patterns of aromatics. The multidimensional character and the definition and measurement of aromaticity generated confusion and conflicts.43 A recent review discussed the multidimensional character of aromaticity and theoretical and experimental approaches to aromatic structures and their predictions, and references are indicated extensively.66... [Pg.10]

Conflicting results have been reported for aromatic compounds. Aerosol formation has been reported from benzene, toluene, and other alkylbenzenes by several investigators, whereas no aerosol formation was observed in other studies. This merits further investigation, in view of the large fraction of aromatic hydrocarbons present in polluted atmospheres. [Pg.60]

The mechanism of the formation of tricyclic intermediates 56 and 57 is also the important and conflicting matter. For example, Quiroga et al. [83] showed that these MCRs, the most probable, proceed via preliminary Knoevenagel condensation and Michael addition (Scheme 26). At the same time they rejected another pathway including the generation of enamine 60, because no reaction was observed between it and aromatic aldehyde when their mixture was refluxed in ethanol. [Pg.59]

These equations show the general theoretical basis for the empirical order of rate constants given earlier for electrophilic attack on an aromatic ligand L, its metal complex ML, and its protonated form HL, one finds kt > n > hl. Conflicting reports in the literature state that coordination can both accelerate electrophilic aromatic substitution (30) and slow it down enormously (2). In the first case the rates of nitration of the diprotonated form of 0-phenanthroline and its Co(III) and Fe(III) complexes were compared. Here coordination prevents protonation in the mixed acid medium used for nitration and kML > h2l. In the second case the phenolate form of 8-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonic acid and its metal chelates were compared. The complexes underwent iodination much more slowly, if at all, and kL > kML ... [Pg.160]

Resonance between three 7t-complex structures might lead to stabilization of 1 in the sense of 7t-aromatic stabilization involving the six CC bond electrons. Therefore, Dewar8 has discussed the stability of 1 in terms of a u-aromatic stabilization (Section V). However, spin-coupled valence bond theory clearly shows that 1 cannot be considered as the aromatic benzene51. The 7t-complex description of 1 is a (very formal) model description, which should be discarded as soon as it leads to conflicting descriptions of the properties of 1. This will be discussed in Section V. [Pg.73]

About (i) and (2) there can be no dispute, but (3) must be rejected. The implication that the nitronium ion, effectively freed from a close association with another entity, is not the nitrating agent in those reactions of benzene and its homologues, under conditions in which substantial intermolecular selectivity is observed, conflicts with previous evidence ( 3.2). Thus, in nitration in organic solvents and in aqueous nitric acids, the observation of kinetically zeroth-order nitration, and the effect of added nitrate on this rate, is compelling evidence for the operation of the nitronium ion. The nitric acidium ion is not the electrophile under these conditions, and it is difficult to envisage how a species in which the water is loosened but not yet completely eliminated could be formed in a slow step independent of the aromatic and be capable of a separate existence. It is implicit that this species should be appreciably different from the nitronium ion in its electrophilic properties. There is no support to be found for the participation of the aromatic in the formation of the electrophile. [Pg.72]


See other pages where Aromaticity conflicting is mentioned: [Pg.334]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.882]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.873]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.1005]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.152]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.58 , Pg.302 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info