Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Angular Features

The values of p listed in Table 2.8 illustrate that these complexes all adopt a pyramidal geometry, closer to A shown earlier than to planar configuration B. This is particularly true of the complexes containing H S where the p angles approach 90°. Indeed, early microwave spectra of suggested the proton acceptor molecule was oriented [Pg.64]

Szczesniak et al. have pointed out an interesting relationship between the stretch of the hydrogen away from the X atom and the energetics of the interaction. They have shown that Ar is very nearly linear, over a range of HX stretches, with respect to the contribution made by electron correlation to the H-bond. The authors assumed the latter is dominated by dispersion, and so concluded that the stretch of the H—X bond causes an increase in the molecule s polarizability. They hence infer that a molecule whose polarizability is sensitive to the X—H bond length can enhance its ability to form a H-bond by permitting a greater stretch of the bond upon complexation. [Pg.66]


In summary, we can say that, because of the unique absence of angular and radial nodes in the H-atom valence shell, the hydride oah orbital is uniquely suited to strong n-a donor-acceptor interactions with Lewis bases. In turn, the unique energetic and angular features of nB-aAH interactions (or equivalently, of B H—A <—> B—H+ A covalent-ionic resonance) can be directly associated with the distinctive structural and spectroscopic properties of B - H—A hydrogen bonding. [Pg.661]

Much of chemistry, as we know it, is suitably represented as a process of limited spatial extent taking place in an environment of some sort. The molecular interactions, which link the different constituents of the system together (solvent to solute, enzyme to substrate, molecule to molecule), differ with respect to length scale, strength, angular features and, consequently, relevance for the process under study. [Pg.215]

It appears then that simple considerations of electrostatics offer a convenient means of predicting most of the angular features of H-bonded complexes. One must also include some mechanism to avoid collapse of the entire structure this function can be served by hard-sphere models or more sophisticated versions. Finer details require higher level calculations. For example, accurate intermolecu-lar distances cannot be expected from this simple model. Relative stabilities of isomers of comparable energy can be difficult to distinguish. [Pg.182]

Experimental work by Janda et al. [108] has indicated that HCl acts as proton donor when paired with HF. With regard to ab initio studies, Hobza et al. [106, 109] found from calculations with fairly small basis sets that HF HCl is likely to be somewhat more stable than HCl HF, i.e. HCl acts as proton donor. More recent work using doubly polarized sets [103] indicates the difference in energy between these two geometries is quite small, perhaps 0.25 kJ/mol. The angular features of the complexes are reminiscent of the (HF)2 or (HC1)2 homodimers above. In either case, the hydrogen of the proton donor remains within 7° or 8° of the F Cl axis. The orientation of the proton acceptor molecule seems to be fairly independent of the donor. That is, HCl is nearly perpendicular to the F Cl axis (fi = 93°) while this angle is 120° for HF. [Pg.183]

MM potentials should be able to account for the fine angular features of AE(QC) upon performing in- and out-of-plane variations of the approach of two interacting atoms at fixed equilibrium distance that is, the departure from the assumption of atom-centered spherical symmetry. This might not be warranted by simple point-charge electrostatics and atom-atom Lennard-Jones-like formulas for E p and... [Pg.7]

At the time the experiments were perfomied (1984), this discrepancy between theory and experiment was attributed to quantum mechanical resonances drat led to enhanced reaction probability in the FlF(u = 3) chaimel for high impact parameter collisions. Flowever, since 1984, several new potential energy surfaces using a combination of ab initio calculations and empirical corrections were developed in which the bend potential near the barrier was found to be very flat or even non-collinear [49, M], in contrast to the Muckennan V surface. In 1988, Sato [ ] showed that classical trajectory calculations on a surface with a bent transition-state geometry produced angular distributions in which the FIF(u = 3) product was peaked at 0 = 0°, while the FIF(u = 2) product was predominantly scattered into the backward hemisphere (0 > 90°), thereby qualitatively reproducing the most important features in figure A3.7.5. [Pg.878]

The adiabatic functions are characterized by two interesting features (1) they depend only on the angular coordinate (but not on the radial coordinate) and (2) they are not single valued in configuration space because when

adiabatic wave functions back to their... [Pg.715]

There are a number of features that all couplings have in common. One is the need for a spacer. API 671 calls for an 18-inch spacer minimum, This is reasonable for smaller units, say to 5,000 hp however, as the size of train increases to 15,000 to 20,000 hp, a 24-inch spacer should be considered. Above that size, longer spacers, 30 to 36 inches, are in order. The spacer first of all provides for unit separation and maintenance space. Secondly, the longer the spacer, the less the angular deflection of the coupling at its flexure point for a given offset. This makes absolute equipment alignment less critical. [Pg.334]

E. L. Church, H. A. Jenkinson, and J. M. Zavada. Relation Berween the Angular Dependence of Scattering and Microtopographic Features. [Pg.721]

Although CNTs showed similar EELS pattern in plasmon-loss and core-loss regions to graphite, SWCNT and fine MWCNT with a diameter less than 5 nm had different features. Furthermore, it has been found out that the angular-dependent EELS along the direction normal to the longitudinal axis of CNT shows stronger contribution from Jt electrons than [Pg.38]


See other pages where Angular Features is mentioned: [Pg.64]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.877]    [Pg.878]    [Pg.956]    [Pg.1554]    [Pg.2937]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.730]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.763]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.1234]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.401]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info