And plant content

The assessment of plant-available soil contents can frequently be achieved and validated by field experiments for nutritionally essential elements, and, for a few potentially toxic elements such as chromium, nickel and molybdenum, at the moderately elevated concentrations that can occur in agricultural situations. The validation of extraction methods, devised for agricultural and nutritional purposes, is much less easy to achieve when they are applied to heavy metals and other potentially toxic elements, especially at the higher concentrations obtained in industrially contaminated land. This is not surprising in view of the fact that for some heavy metals, for example lead, there is an effective root barrier, in many food crop plants, to their uptake and much of the metal enters plants not from the root but by deposition from the atmosphere on to leaves. In these circumstances little direct correlation would be expected between soil extractable contents and plant contents. For heavy metals and other potentially toxic elements, therefore, extraction methods are mainly of value for the assessment of the mobile and potentially mobile species rather than plant-available species. This assessment of mobile species contents may well, however, indicate the risk of plant availability in changing environmental conditions or changes in land use. 

When PTMs concentration is well in excess of normal soil content, extraction method validation, in terms of direct correlation between soil extractable contents and plant contents, is less easy to achieve. In these cases, it may be adequate to develop an operational estimate of the mobile and potentially mobile metal species rather than plant-available species. It is necessary to analyse metal partitioning between such fractions as exchangeable sites, organic matter and minerals of varying solubility. 

---