Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Analytical methodology comparison

The reader is directed to Ref. 5, which makes an interesting comparison between HPLC and other analytical methodologies for the determination of carbohydrates in foods. Additionally, notable progress has been made in the application of high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE) in this field (8-11). However, given the scope of this chapter, we will focus on the advantages and drawbacks of other chromatographic techniques versus HPLC. [Pg.288]

Solution-based nucleic acid hybridization assays represent a class of analytical methodologies that provide for detection of target-probe hybridization events. Solution-based assays offer several advantages in comparison to configurations that use surface-bound probes, primarily from the standpoint of negating the requirement for immobilization of a probe sequence to a solid surface. Therefore, thermodynamic, kinetic and adsorptive effects that are relevant in terms of consideration of hybridization at interfaces are not encountered. Solution-based hybridization assays provide a simple way of detecting hybridization events in real-time. [Pg.245]

What is known for certain is that WSOM components constitute a substantial fraction of OAs. To date, only a small number of aerosol WSOM samples have been studied and characterized, and most of them were collected in European locations. Besides, each collected sample was extracted and isolated by different procedures, which hinders the comparison of the fine physical and chemical properties of the isolated organic fractions. The establishment of a standardized analytical methodology for WSOM extraction and isolation seems to be an important prerequisite for efficient further characterization of aerosol WSOM samples from different areas with different degrees of pollution (urban versus rural versus remote areas in different regions of the world). [Pg.476]

Lioy P New Jersey University of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Piscataway NJ Refinement of exposure/dose models. Comparison of bioavailability of elemental waste laden soils using in vivo and in vitro analytical methodology DOE... [Pg.313]

The most important lesson to be learned from our discussions of various analytic methodologies for multiple comparisons is that the method chosen can have a major impact on the risk of making incorrect decisions. [Pg.164]

For example, in the analgesic example cited above (25), a comparison was made between an analysis using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method and the proposed mixed effects maximum likelihood method. Although this was a retrospective analysis, similar contrasts could be included in the trial s simulation to ascertain the most appropriate analytical methodology to include in the study design (protocol). Other analysis factors for consideration include appropriate correction of variability, where such sources may include differences between sites or regional differences. [Pg.887]

RG Buice et al. Analytical methodologies for cyclosporine pharmacokinetics—A comparison of radioimmunoassay with high performance liquid chromatography. J Liq Chromatogr 10 421, 1987. [Pg.301]

The analytical methodology currently available for fossil fuel hydrocarbon analyses is sensitive and selective to the point that individual aromatic hydrocarbons can be measured in sediment and tissue samples at 10 9 g/g dry weight concentration levels. We should all be concerned that intercalibration exercises reveal wide differences, often a factor of 10 or more in values reported by different laboratories. We cannot ignore this and we should strive to calibrate and refine the methodology to the point where we and others can be more confident of the data comparisons from area to area and from one laboratory study to another. A factor of 10 in concentration of toxic compounds can easily be the difference between a healthy and a severely impacted ecosystem. [Pg.27]

Comparison between the two chief types of continuous analytical methodologies segmented (SFA) and unsegmented (FIA)... [Pg.162]

Although substantial progress has been made in determining acrylamide, a recent interlaboratory comparison showed that many current methods are not satisfactory for samples in complex matrices. liven with relatively simple samples, the range of results was loo wide to be acceptable. Hius. more improvements in analytical methodology are certainty in order. A fully validated improved LC/MS/ MS method was recently reported that uses isotope dilution. l.C. and electrospray ionization MS/MS. lixcellem results were obtained on chocolate powders, cocoa, and coffec. [Pg.891]

Buice, R.G. Stentz, F.B. Gurley, B.J. Analytical methodologies for cyclosporine pharmacokinetics A comparison of radioimmunoassay with high performance liquid chromatography. J.Liq.Chromatogr., 1987, 10, 421-438 [pharmacokinetics bile plasma serum dog]... [Pg.456]

Independent of the analytical methodology used, detecting good binders within a DCL requires the comparison of AFs for the various library members, rather than absolute differences in concentration (these two metrics are equivalent in libraries where all library members have similar concentration in the absence of... [Pg.67]


See other pages where Analytical methodology comparison is mentioned: [Pg.293]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.747]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.1274]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.4057]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.4345]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.756]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.725]    [Pg.932]    [Pg.184]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.12 ]




SEARCH



Analytical methodology

Methodologies comparison

© 2024 chempedia.info