Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Analytical expressions energy derivatives

Analytical expressions were derived for the CW EPR line-shape for spin-polarized radical pairs in the limit where the combined dipolar and exchange interaction is weak relative to the energy differences between the resonances of the two spins.19 The equations were applied to the case of charge-separated sites in Ti02 nanoparticles. This approach simplifies the analysis of the distributions of interspin distances. [Pg.319]

It is essential for computational methods addressing chemical problems the availability of analytic expressions for derivatives. The variety of derivatives appearing in molecular calculations is quite large, but we limit ourselves to considering derivatives of the energy with respect to nuclear coordinates. [Pg.1047]

A drawback of the SCRF method is its use of a spherical cavity molecules are rarely exac spherical in shape. However, a spherical representation can be a reasonable first apprc mation to the shape of many molecules. It is also possible to use an ellipsoidal cavity t may be a more appropriate shape for some molecules. For both the spherical and ellipsoi cavities analytical expressions for the first and second derivatives of the energy can derived, so enabling geometry optimisations to be performed efficiently. For these cavil it is necessary to define their size. In the case of a spherical cavity a value for the rad can be calculated from the molecular volume ... [Pg.611]

At first sight, the easiest approach is to fit a set of points near the saddle point to some analytical expression. Derivatives of the fitted function can then be used to locate the saddle point. This method has been well used for small molecules (see Sana, 1981). An accurate fit to a large portion of the potential energy surface is also needed for the study of reaction dynamics by classical or semi-classical trajectory methods. [Pg.249]

Analytical gradient energy expressions have been reported for many of the standard models discussed in this book. Analytical second derivatives are also widely available. The main use of analytical gradient methods is to locate stationaiy points on potential energy surfaces. So, for example, in order to find an expression for the gradient of a closed-shell HF-LCAO wavefunction we might start with the electronic energy expression from Chapter 6,... [Pg.276]

ABF shares some similarities with the technique of Laio et al. [30-34], in which potential energy terms in the form of Gaussian functions are added to the system in order to escape from energy minima and accelerate the sampling of the system. However, this approach is not based on an analytical expression for the derivative of the free energy but rather on importance sampling. [Pg.123]

Without explicit analytical expressions for the free energy derivative (as could be obtained for the case of a Bom ion in a dielectric medium), the integral has to be evaluated numerically by simulation. [Pg.173]

We investigate theoretically how the adsorption of the polymer varies with the displacer concentration. A simple analytical expression for the critical displacer concentration is derived, which is found to agree very well with numerical results from recent polymer adsorption theory. One of the applications of this expression is the determination of segmental adsorption energies from experimental desorption conditions and the adsorption energy of the displacer. Illustrative experiments and other applications are briefly discussed. [Pg.53]

We have now derived the phase boundary between the two liquids. By analogy with our earlier examples, the two phases may exist as metastable states in a certain part of the p,T potential space. However, at some specific conditions the phases become mechanically unstable. These conditions correspond to the spinodal lines for the system. An analytical expression for the spinodals of the regular solution-type two-state model can be obtained by using the fact that the second derivative of the Gibbs energy with regards to xsi)B is zero at spinodal points. Hence,... [Pg.148]

To answer this question, let us first consider a neutral molecule that is usually said to be polar if it possesses a dipole moment (the term dipolar would be more appropriate)1 . In solution, the solute-solvent interactions result not only from the permanent dipole moments of solute or solvent molecules, but also from their polarizabilities. Let us recall that the polarizability a of a spherical molecule is defined by means of the dipole m = E induced by an external electric field E in its own direction. Figure 7.1 shows the four major dielectric interactions (dipole-dipole, solute dipole-solvent polarizability, solute polarizability-solvent dipole, polarizability-polarizability). Analytical expressions of the corresponding energy terms can be derived within the simple model of spherical-centered dipoles in isotropically polarizable spheres (Suppan, 1990). These four non-specific dielectric in-... [Pg.201]

This procedure requires analytical expressions for EPP(E) and its derivative with respect to E it usually converges in three iterations. Neglect of off-diagonal elements of the self-energy matrix also implies that the corresponding Dyson orbital is given by ... [Pg.136]

The ions in the array arrange themselves in order to minimize the bulk energy of the substance. The equilibrium condition is analytically expressed by equating to zero the first derivative of the potential energy over distance ... [Pg.47]

To calculate the vibrational frequency of CO using DFT, we first have to find the bond length that minimizes the molecule s energy. The only other piece of information we need to calculate is a = (d2E/db2)h hlj. Unfortunately, plane-wave DFT calculations do not routinely evaluate an analytical expression for the second derivatives of the energy with respect to atomic positions. However, we can obtain a good estimate of the second derivative using a finite-difference approximation ... [Pg.115]

Equation 37 gives the analytical form of the free surface energy of the diffuse part of the double layer and has been derived by a number of authors [8,9, 40] for 1 1 ionic surfactants. For systems with mixed valences, the integral in Eq. 34 is usually not available in close analytical expressions and numerical integration is often required. [Pg.36]

The selection rules for the QM harmonic oscillator pennit transitions only for An = 1 (see Section 14.5). As Eq. (9.47) indicates diat the energy separation between any two adjacent levels is always hm, the predicted frequency for die = 0 to n = 1 absorption (or indeed any allowed absorption) is simply v = o). So, in order to predict die stretching frequency within the harmonic oscillator equation, all diat is needed is the second derivative of the energy with respect to bond stretching computed at die equilibrium geometry, i.e., k. The importance of k has led to considerable effort to derive analytical expressions for second derivatives, and they are now available for HF, MP2, DFT, QCISD, CCSD, MCSCF and select other levels of theory, although they can be quite expensive at some of the more highly correlated levels of theoiy. [Pg.336]

To establish the molecular thermodynamic model for uniform systems based on concepts from statistical mechanics, an effective method by combining statistical mechanics and molecular simulation has been recommended (Hu and Liu, 2006). Here, the role of molecular simulation is not limited to be a standard to test the reliability of models. More directly, a few simulation results are used to determine the analytical form and the corresponding coefficients of the models. It retains the rigor of statistical mechanics, while mathematical difficulties are avoided by using simulation results. The method is characterized by two steps (1) based on a statistical-mechanical derivation, an analytical expression is obtained first. The expression may contain unknown functions or coefficients because of mathematical difficulty or sometimes because of the introduced simplifications. (2) The form of the unknown functions or unknown coefficients is then determined by simulation results. For the adsorption of polymers at interfaces, simulation was used to test the validity of the weighting function of the WDA in DFT. For the meso-structure of a diblock copolymer melt confined in curved surfaces, we found from MC simulation that some more complex structures exist. From the information provided by simulation, these complex structures were approximated as a combination of simple structures. Then, the Helmholtz energy of these complex structures can be calculated by summing those of the different simple structures. [Pg.211]


See other pages where Analytical expressions energy derivatives is mentioned: [Pg.224]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.611]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.10]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.268 ]




SEARCH



Analytic derivatives

Analytical derivatives

Analytical expressions

Derivative, energy

Energy analytical expressions

Energy expression

© 2024 chempedia.info