Ammonia catalyst surface measurement

A comprehensive kinetic model addressing all the findings has not been developed. Some of the reported rate equations consider the self-poisoning effect of the reactant compounds, some other that effect of ammonia, and so on so forth. The reported data is dispersed with a variety of non-comparable conditions and results. The adsorption of the poisoning compounds has been modeled assuming one or two-sites on the catalyst surface however, the applicability of these expressions also needs to be addressed to other reacting systems to verity its reliability. The model also needs of validated adsorption parameters, difficult to measure under the operating conditions. 

The surface nethoxyl groups on the modified catalyst were measured by i.r. spectroscopy and their thermal stabilities were studied by Temperature-Programmed Decomposition (TPDE) in Ar. The surface acidity was measured by TPD of irreversibly adsorbed ammonia and by pyridine adsorption by dynamic method and i.r. spectroscopy. 0.10 g pretreated catalyst was used to measure the amount of irreversibly adsorbed pyridine. The irreversibly adsorbed ammonia was... 

The ammonia molecule donates a pair of electrons to the electron-deficient aluminum atom in the above reaction, thus completing a stable octet of electrons. This example is a pertinent one, since adsorption of ammonia has been used as a way of measuring the acidity of solid catalyst surfaces. 

The rate o oxidation o ammonia at atmospheric pressure on single wires and ribbons has been determined as a function of a gas flow rate and catalyst size. In agreement with boundary layer diffusion theory the function rx, where r is the average rate of reaction/unit area, and x is the length of the surface measured in the direction of gas flow, is directly proportional to gas velocity. 

The state of iron ammonia catalysts is dealt with in the following chapters, and x-ray, magnetic, and electric data will be discussed together with adsorption measurements. Information about the catalysts combined with kinetic experiments has led to a fairly good qualitative understanding of ammonia synthesis on iron catalysts, but owing to the extremely complicated nature of the catalyst surface during reaction, a quantitative treatment based on data of catalyst and reactants will not be attained in the near future. 

In the catalytic combination of nitrogen and hydrogen, the molecules lose their translational degrees of freedom by fixation on the catalyst surface. This drastically reduces the required energy of activation, for example, to 103 kj/mol on iron [100], The reaction may then proceed in the temperature range 250-400 °C. In 1972, it was discovered that electron donor - acceptor (EDA) complexes permit making ammonia with measurable reaction rate at room temperature. 

The effectiveness, p, is a measure of the utilization of the internal surface of the catalyst and Cg is the concentration of the reactant, a, at the external catalyst surface. It depends on the dimensions of the catalyst particle and its pores, on the diffusivity, specific rate, and heat of reaction. With a given kind of catalyst, the only control is particle size to which the effectiveness is proportional a compromise must be made between effectiveness and pressure drop. In simple cases r] can be related mathematically to its parameters, but in such important practical cases as ammonia synthesis its dependence on parameters is complex and strictly empirical. Section 17.5 deals with this topic. 

The well-known poisoning of the iron catalyst, used in ammonia synthesis, by minute amounts of water vapor or oxygen seems to be compatible with chemisorption measurements. According to Almquist and Black (85) only 10 to 15% poisoning of the total B.E.T. surface of this catalyst causes a decrease of its catalytic activity by about 70%. Since only a part of the catalyst surface actively chemisorbs hydrogen, and, probably, nitrogen, the area active for the formation of ammonia can also be expected to be a mere fraction of the total surface. 

The acid site distributions of the catalysts were measured by a Datacat pulse micro-reactor/temperature programmer, using 200-300mg of the catalyst sample pretreated in N2 flow at 450°C for 3h and the temperature was brought down to 80°C where the catalyst sample was saturated with an anhydrous NH3 (Matheson). Then the sample was flushed in N2 flow at 100°C for 3h in order to remove the physisorbed ammonia on the catalyst surface. The desorption pattern was obtained with a temperature ramp of 12°C nrin upto 500°C. 

BET surface area of the catalysts was measured by physical adsorption of nitrogen at 77K. Chemisorption of ammonia was studied on the catalysts at ambient temperature after degassing the catalyst at 150 C for 2 h. O2 chemisorption was carried out at -78°C after reducing the catalysts at 450°C for 2 h in a stream of hydrogen [11]. Determination of oxidation number of vanadium in the V20s/Ti02 catalysts was carried out by titrimetric procedures adopted by Nakamura et al [12]. 

Brunauer and Emmett 120), in their extensive studies on synthetic ammonia catalysts have concluded, by a comparison of the CO uptakes and nitrogen adsorption surface area measurements, that on pure iron at temperatures between —78 and — 183°C CO chemisorbs up to one molecule per surface atom. Beebe and Stevens 121) from measurements of differential heats of adsorption confirmed that chemisorption rather than physical adsorption was occurring in this system. 

Measuring Surface Promoter Distribution Attention has already been called to the use that has been made of surface area measurements in studying synthetic ammonia catalysts. It has been possible, for example, to show that certain promoters have a specific influence on the activity per unit surface area (4). Thus iron catalysts containing both K2O and AI2O3 as promoters have surfaces that are only about one-third as large as those containing only AhOs as promoter and yet are several fold more active under synthesis conditions. 

The direct measurement of heats is also more accurate than the computation of energies from TPD data, which quantifies average activation energies of desorption. Whereas calorimetry can yield a detailed picture of the distribution of strong acid sites on the catalyst surface, tiie TPD of ammonia usually yields only an average value [16], except when appropriate kinetic models are employed. 

In 1935 Brunauer and Emmett [121] carried out the first successful attempt to determine - by means of isotherm adsorption of six different gases - the surface area of an iron synthetic ammonia catalyst. Later [122], in 1937, these authors determined the surface area of two different silica gels measuring adsorption isotherms of seven different gases.. In the above mentioned works the surface area was determined by extrapolating the middle linear sections of experimental isotherms to zero pressure in order to obtain the amount of gas required to cover the adsorbent surface with a monomolecular layer. On condition that the monomolecular layer was in a close-packed stage, the surface area was then evaluated from the monolayer adsorbed amount. Brunauer and Emmett [121,122] also proposed to determine the monolayer adsorption amount from the so-called point B of the experimental isotherm. It was assumed that this point corresponds to the inflection point and can be obtained from the beginning of the linear section of adsorption isotherms. 

---