Alternate population

To summarize Figure 18-1 in words, the top curve represents the characteristics of a population P0 with mean /x0. Also indicated in Figure 18-1 is the upper critical limit, marking the 95% point for a standard hypothesis test (//0) that the mean of a given sample is consistent with /x . A measured value above the critical value indicates that it would be too unlikely to have come from population P0, so we would conclude that such a reading came from a different population. Two such possible different, or alternate, populations are also shown in Figure 18-1, and labeled Pt and P2. Now, if in fact a random sample was taken from one of these alternate populations, there is a given probability, whose value depends on which population it came from, that it would fall above (or below) the upper critical limit indicated for H0. 

The shaded areas in Figure 18-1 indicate the probabilities for a random sample falling below the critical value for H0, when one of those alternate populations is in fact the correct population from which the sample was taken. As can be seen, these probabilities are 50% for population Px and roughly 5% for population P2. These probabilities are... 

Figure 18-1 Characteristics of population PQ with mean yu0 and alternate populations Px and P2 (Note that the X-axes have been offset for clarity).

Continuing from our previous discussion in Chapter 18 from reference [1], analogous to making what we have called (and is the standard statistical terminology) the a error when the data is above the critical value but is really from P0, this new error is called the [3 error, and the corresponding probability is called the (3 probability. As a caveat, we must note that the correct value of [3 can be obtained only subject to the usual considerations of all statistical calculations errors are random and independent, and so on. In addition, since we do not really know the characteristics of the alternate population, we must make additional assumptions. One of these assumptions is that the standard deviation of the alternate population (Pa) is the same as that of the hypothesized population (P0), regardless of the value of its mean. 

The existence of the [3 probability provides us with the tool for determining what is called the power of the test, which is just 1 - j8, the probability of coming to the correct conclusion when in fact the data did not come from the hypothesized population P0. This is the answer to our earlier question once we have defined the alternate population Pa, we can determine the /3 probability of a sample having come from Pa, just as we can determine the a probability of that sample having come from P0. 

Fig. 2 (a) Populations of the ground electronic state of the adsorbate without delayed dissipation for two vibrational levels r = vg = 0,1, Pg>r and their sum Pg (b) Results with delayed dissipation, versus time. Here the alternating populations of states r = vg = 0,1 show quantum state coherence. 

Alternatively, population estimates from the entire data set can be used with Monte Carlo techniques to simulate a large number of subjects from which bootstrapped subsamples can be analyzed and compared as above. 

A general mathematical treatment of the precellular self-organization of matter and the evolution of macromolecules was presented some time ago by Eigen. > A set of selectivity and evolutionary principles were derived for alternative populated states of macromolecules, leading towards states of higher complexity and information content. It would be highly desirable to analyze and correlate the three models presented thus far (molecular, co-acervate-microsphere and mathematical), select the realistic and cooperative portions of these models, and integrate them into a theory of precellular evolution which could be experimentally tested. 

---