Allyl alcohols hydroxylation

Generally, isolated olefinic bonds will not escape attack by these reagents. However, in certain cases where the rate of hydroxyl oxidation is relatively fast, as with allylic alcohols, an isolated double bond will survive. Thepresence of other nucleophilic centers in the molecule, such as primary and secondary amines, sulfides, enol ethers and activated aromatic systems, will generate undesirable side reactions, but aldehydes, esters, ethers, ketals and acetals are generally stable under neutral or basic conditions. Halogenation of the product ketone can become but is not always a problem when base is not included in the reaction mixture. The generated acid can promote formation of an enol which in turn may compete favorably with the alcohol for the oxidant. 

The use of dimethyl sulfoxide-acetic anhydride as a reagent for the oxidation of unhindered steroidal alcohols does not appear to be as promising due to extensive formation of by-products. However, the reagent is sufficiently reactive to oxidize the hindered 11 j -hydroxyl group to the 11-ketone in moderate yield. The use of sulfur trioxide-pyridine complex in dimethyl sulfoxide has also been reported. The results parallel those using DCC-DMSO but reaction times are much shorter and the work-up is more facile since the separation of dicyclohexylurea is not necessary. Allylic alcohols can be oxidized by this procedure without significant side reactions. 

When used at room temperature in the presence of an active platinum catalyst in an inert solvent, e.g., acetone or ethyl acetate, oxygen will oxidize nonhindered, saturated hydroxyl groups and exposed allylic alcohols. This reagent has found extensive use in sugar chemistry and is particularly suited for the selective oxidation of either 3a- or 3j -alcohols of steroids. Other hydroxyl groups on the steroid skeleton are much less sensitive to oxidation. As a result, this reaction has been used extensively in research on polyhydroxy cardiac-active principles, e.g., the cardenolides and bufadienolides, where the 3-hydroxyl group is easily oxidized without extensive oxidation or dehydration of other hydroxyl groups. The ordinarily difficult selective oxidation of the... 

Hydroxyl groups are stable to peracids, but oxidation of an allylic alcohol during an attempted epoxidation reaction has been reported." The di-hydroxyacetone side chain is usually protected during the peracid reaction, either by acetylation or by formation of a bismethylenedioxy derivative. To obtain high yields of epoxides it is essential to avoid high reaction temperatures and a strongly acidic medium. The products of epoxidation of enol acetates are especially sensitive to heat or acid and can easily rearrange to keto acetates. 

Employing protocol V with the methanesulfonamide catalyst 122, a 93 7 er can be obtained in the cyclopropanation of cinnamyl alcohol. This high selectivity translates well into a number of allylic alcohols (Table 3.12) [82]. Di- and tri-substi-tuted alkenes perform well under the conditions of protocol V. However, introduction of substituents on the 2 position leads to a considerable decrease in rate and selectivity (Table 3.12, entry 5). The major failing of this method is its inability to perform selective cyclopropanations of other hydroxyl-containing molecules, most notably homoallylic alcohols. 

N,O-acetal intermediate 172, y,<5-unsaturated amide 171. It is important to note that there is a correspondence between the stereochemistry at C-41 of the allylic alcohol substrate 173 and at C-37 of the amide product 171. Provided that the configuration of the hydroxyl-bearing carbon in 173 can be established as shown, then the subsequent suprafacial [3,3] sigmatropic rearrangement would ensure the stereospecific introduction of the C-37 side chain during the course of the Eschenmoser-Claisen rearrangement, stereochemistry is transferred from C-41 to C-37. Ketone 174, a potential intermediate for a synthesis of 173, could conceivably be fashioned in short order from epoxide 175. 

The synthesis of the trisubstituted cyclohexane sector 160 commences with the preparation of optically active (/ )-2-cyclohexen-l-ol (199) (see Scheme 49). To accomplish this objective, the decision was made to utilize the powerful catalytic asymmetric reduction process developed by Corey and his colleagues at Harvard.83 Treatment of 2-bromocyclohexenone (196) with BH3 SMe2 in the presence of 5 mol % of oxazaborolidine 197 provides enantiomeri-cally enriched allylic alcohol 198 (99% yield, 96% ee). Reductive cleavage of the C-Br bond in 198 with lithium metal in terf-butyl alcohol and THF then provides optically active (/ )-2-cyclo-hexen-l-ol (199). When the latter substance is treated with wCPBA, a hydroxyl-directed Henbest epoxidation84 takes place to give an epoxy alcohol which can subsequently be protected in the form of a benzyl ether (see 175) under standard conditions. 

The aldehyde function at C-85 in 25 is unmasked by oxidative hydrolysis of the thioacetal group (I2, NaHCOs) (98 % yield), and the resulting aldehyde 26 is coupled to Z-iodoolefin 10 by a NiCh/CrCH-mediated process to afford a ca. 3 2 mixture of diaste-reoisomeric allylic alcohols 27, epimeric at C-85 (90 % yield). The low stereoselectivity of this coupling reaction is, of course, inconsequential, since the next operation involves oxidation [pyridinium dichromate (PDC)] to the corresponding enone and. olefination with methylene triphenylphosphorane to furnish the desired diene system (70-75% overall yield from dithioacetal 9). Deprotection of the C-77 primary hydroxyl group by mild acid hydrolysis (PPTS, MeOH-ClHhCh), followed by Swem oxidation, then leads to the C77-C115 aldehyde 28 in excellent overall yield. 

Table IV presents the results of the determination of polyethylene radioactivity after the decomposition of the active bonds in one-component catalysts by methanol, labeled in different positions. In the case of TiCU (169) and the catalyst Cr -CjHsU/SiCU (8, 140) in the initial state the insertion of tritium of the alcohol hydroxyl group into the polymer corresponds to the expected polarization of the metal-carbon bond determined by the difference in electronegativity of these elements. The decomposition of active bonds in this case seems to follow the scheme (25) (see Section V). But in the case of the chromium oxide catalyst and the catalyst obtained by hydrogen reduction of the supported chromium ir-allyl complexes (ir-allyl ligands being removed from the active center) (140) C14 of the...

A novel approach was developed very recently by Kita et al. [15]. DKR of allylic alcohols was performed by combining a lipase-catalyzed acylation with a racemization through the formation of allyl vanadate intermediates. Excellent yields and enantioselectivities were obtained. An example is shown in Figure 4.4. A limitation with this approach for the substrates shown in Figure 4.4 is that the allylic alcohol must be equally disubstituted in the allylic position (R = R ) since C—C single bond rotation is required in the tertiary alkoxy intermediate. Alternatively, R or R can be H if the two allylic alcohols formed by migration of the hydroxyl group are enantiomers (e.g. cyclic allylic acetates). 

Asymmetric epoxidation is another important area of activity, initially pioneered by Sharpless, using catalysts based on titanium tetraisoprop-oxide and either (+) or (—) dialkyl tartrate. The enantiomer formed depends on the tartrate used. Whilst this process has been widely used for the synthesis of complex carbohydrates it is limited to allylic alcohols, the hydroxyl group bonding the substrate to the catalyst. Jacobson catalysts (Formula 4.3) based on manganese complexes with chiral Shiff bases have been shown to be efficient in epoxidation of a wide range of alkenes. 

---