Alkenes anti addition

The stereochemistry of radical addition of hydrogen bromide to alkenes has been studied with both acyclic and cyclic alkenes. Anti addition is favored.This is contrary to what would be expected if the s[p- carbon of the radical were rapidly rotating or inverting with respect to the remainder of the molecule ... 

Have you noticed yet For symmetric alkenes and symmetric reagents (addition of two identical X groups) c/5 -alkene + syn addition meso c/5 -alkene + anti addition racemic trans-3 ktnt + syn addition racemic... 

The classic analysis that implicates the formation of a cyclic halonium ion emphasizes the stereochemistry of the products. With unconjugated alkenes, anti addition is consistently seen. This requires backside attack of the nucleophile, indicating that the "frontside" has been blocked. For example, the addition of bromine to 3-t-butylcyclohexene gives trans-dibromo products (Eq. 10.15). 

The stereoehemishy of radieal addition of hydrogen bromide to alkenes has been studied with both acyehe and eyehe alkenes. Anti addition is favored. This is... 

Addition of halogens (Sections 6 14-6 16) Bromine and chlorine add to alkenes to form vicinal dihalides A cy clic halonium ion is an intermediate Stereospecific anti addition is observed... 

Figures 7 13 and 7 14 depict the stereochemical relationships associated with anti addition of bromine to (E) and (Z) 2 butene respectively The trans alkene (E) 2 butene yields only meso 2 3 dibromobutane but the cis alkene (Z) 2 butene gives a racemic mixture of 2R 3R) and 2S 3S) 2 3 dibromobutane...

Overall the stereospecificity of this method is the same as that observed m per oxy acid oxidation of alkenes Substituents that are cis to each other m the alkene remain CIS m the epoxide This is because formation of the bromohydrm involves anti addition and the ensuing intramolecular nucleophilic substitution reaction takes place with mver Sion of configuration at the carbon that bears the halide leaving group... 

Entries 1 and 2 in Scheme 2.9 are typical of concerted syn addition to alkene double bonds. On treatment with peroxyacetic acid, the Z-alkene affords the cis-oxirane, whereas the -alkene affords only the iraws-oxirane. Similarly, addition of dibromocarbene to Z-2-butene yields exclusively l,l-dibromo-cw-2,3-dimethylcyclopropane, whereas only 1,1-dibromo-/ra 5-2,3-dimethylcyclopropane is formed from -2-butene. There are also numerous stereospecific anti additions. Entiy 3 shows the anti stereochemistry typical of bromination of simple alkenes. 

If the addition of Br to the alkene results in a bromonium ion, the anti stereochemistry can be readily eiqilained. Nucleophilic ring opening by bromide ion would occur by backside attack at carbon, with rupture of one of the C—Br bonds, giving overall anti addition. 

There have also been relatively few mechanistic studies of the addition of iodine. One significant feature of iodination is that it is easily reversible, even in the presence of excess alkene. The addition is stereospecifically anti, but it is not entirely clear whether a polar or a radical mechanism is involved. ... 

This scheme represents an alkyne-bromine complex as an intermediate in all alkyne brominations. This is analogous to the case of alkenes. The complex may dissociate to a inyl cation when the cation is sufficiently stable, as is the case when there is an aryl substituent. It may collapse to a bridged bromonium ion or undergo reaction with a nucleophile. The latta is the dominant reaction for alkyl-substituted alkynes and leads to stereospecific anti addition. Reactions proceeding through vinyl cations are expected to be nonstereospecific. 

For reactions of A-acyliminium ions with alkenes and alkynes one has to distinguish between A-acyliminium ions locked in an s-trans conformation and those which (can) adopt an s-cis conformation. The former type reacts as a (nitrogen stabilized) carbocation with a C —C multiple bond. Although there are some exceptions, the intramolecular reaction of this type is regarded as an anti addition to the 7t-nucleophile, with (nearly) synchronous bond formation, the conformation of the transition state determining the product configuration. 

We have investigated the bromo-addition of alkenes and their related compounds with BTMA Br3. Thus, we found that the reaction of alkenes with BTMA Br3 in aprotic solvents such as dichloromethane and chloroform gave 1,2-dibromo adducts in a manner of stereospecific anti-addition, and, in such protic solvents as methanol and acetic acid, gave the corresponding dibromo adducts along with considerable amounts of solvent-incorporated products in regioselective manner (Fig. 18) (ref. 29). 

Moreover, Negoro et al. reported that the reaction of alkenes and their related compounds with tetrabutylammonium dichlorobromate (TBA BrCl2) in chloroform gave bromochloro-adducts through stereospecific anti-addition (Fig. 19) (ref. 30). 

In investigating the mechanism of addition to a double bond, perhaps the most useful type of information is the stereochemistry of the reaction. The two carbons of the double bond and the four atoms immediately attached to them are all in a plane (p. 8) there are thus three possibilities. Both Y and W may enter from the same side of the plane, in which case the addition is stereospecific and syn they may enter from opposite sides for stereospecific anti addition or the reaction may be nonstereospecific. In order to determine which of these possibilities is occurring in a given reaction, the following type of experiment is often done YW is added to the cis and trans isomers of an alkene of the form ABC=CBA. We may use the cis alkene as an example. If the addition is syn, the product will be the erythro dl pair, because each carbon has a 50% chance of being attacked by Y ... 

Of course, the trans isomer will give the opposite results the threo pair if the addition is syn and the erythro pair if it is anti. The threo and erythro isomers have different physical properties. In the special case where Y=W (as in the addition of Br2), the erythro pair is a meso compound. In addition to triple-bond compounds of the type ACsCA, syn addition results in a cis alkene and anti addition in a trans alkene. By the definition given on page 166 addition to triple bonds cannot be stereospecific, though it can be, and often is, stereoselective. 

If the carbanion has even a short lifetime, 6 and 7 will assume the most favorable conformation before the attack of W. This is of course the same for both, and when W attacks, the same product will result from each. This will be one of two possible diastereomers, so the reaction will be stereoselective but since the cis and trans isomers do not give rise to different isomers, it will not be stereospecific. Unfortunately, this prediction has not been tested on open-chain alkenes. Except for Michael-type substrates, the stereochemistry of nucleophilic addition to double bonds has been studied only in cyclic systems, where only the cis isomer exists. In these cases, the reaction has been shown to be stereoselective with syn addition reported in some cases and anti addition in others." When the reaction is performed on a Michael-type substrate, C=C—Z, the hydrogen does not arrive at the carbon directly but only through a tautomeric equilibrium. The product naturally assumes the most thermodynamically stable configuration, without relation to the direction of original attack of Y. In one such case (the addition of EtOD and of Me3CSD to tra -MeCH=CHCOOEt) predominant anti addition was found there is evidence that the stereoselectivity here results from the final protonation of the enolate, and not from the initial attack. For obvious reasons, additions to triple bonds cannot be stereospecific. As with electrophilic additions, nucleophilic additions to triple bonds are usually stereoselective and anti, though syn addition and nonstereoselective addition have also been reported. 

This species is similar to the bromonium ion that is responsible for stereospecific anti addition in the electrophilic mechanism. Further evidence for the existence of such bridged radicals was obtained by addition of Br- to alkenes at 77 K. The ESR spectra of the resulting species were consistent with bridged structures. ... 

A quick glance at the products indicates that we are adding H and OH across the alkene. Let s take a closer look and carefully analyze the regiochemistry and stereochemistry of this reaction. The OH is ending up on the less substituted carbon, and therefore, the regiochemistry represents an anti-Markovnikov addition. But what about the stereochemistry Are we seeing a syn addition here, or is this anti addition ... 

This step is simply an Sn2, and therefore, must be a back-side attack. In other words, the attacking bromide ion must come from behind (from behind the bridge), and therefore, we get an anti addition. There are some alkenes for which a syn addition predominates. Clearly, a different mechanism is operating in those cases. For the alkenes that you will encounter in this course, this reaction will always be an anti ad-dihon, proceeding via the mechaihsm that we showed. 

Answer (a) We are adding Br and Br, so the regiochemistry is irrelevant. But what about the stereochemistry We look to see whether we are creating two new stereocenters. In this case, we are. So, the stereochemistry is relevant. We have explored the mechanism and justified why the reaction must be an anti addition. So, we must draw the pair of enantiomers that we would get from an anti addition. To do this properly, it will be helpful to redraw the alkene, as we have done many times before ... 

---