Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Algorithm comparisons with other

A novel set of intensifier/diversifier mechanisms will be introduced in order to allow the population to converge to an optimal solution within a determined search space. Comparisons with other nature inspired optimization techniques will be made in order to prove good performance of the proposed algorithm. [Pg.13]

In order to have a better picture of the general schema for this proposed chemical reaction algorithm (CRA), a comparison with other nature inspired paradigms is shown in Table 4.1. [Pg.18]

We describe in Chap. 6 the simulation results and comparison with other approaches for both kinds of application problems presented in Chap. 5. First, the simulation results for a set of benchmark mathematical functions are presented. Second, the simulation results for the problem of designing type-1 and type-2 fuzzy controllers for an autonomous mobile robot is presented and compared against other methods, like genetic algorithms. [Pg.82]

The performance ofthe clipped optimal control algorithm has been evaluated through numerical simulations (Dyke etal., 1996) and demonstrated for multiple MR dampers in Jansen and Dyke (2000). Jansen and Dyke (2000) also presented a comparison with other algorithms. In all cases the clipped optimal controller is found to satisfactorily reduce the structural responses and outperform passive control strategies. [Pg.318]

In the first row of Table 2, we summarize the adder and multiplier allocations fw different timing constraints as obtained fixmi the regular FDS algorithm. In this table, we assume that multipliers require two c-steps for execution and adders only one. The minimum timing constraint for this example is 17 c-steps. Using retiming, it could be reduced to 16 c-steps, but this transformation is not applied to ensure fair comparisons with other systems. CPU times varied between two and six minutes on a Xerox 1108. [Pg.276]

The hyper-focus on benchmark data is a problem that has been observed across the field of machine learning [2]. Typically, a paper on manifold learning or spectral dimensionality reduction will follow a standard evaluation model the algorithm is applied to synthetic data (typically the swiss role), and then applied to other trickier data sets such as Frey faces or MNIST digits. The use of standard benchmark data is not without its benefits it allows for a direct side-by-side comparison with other previously published methods and it also makes interpreting these results far easier. [Pg.83]

The number of equations to be solved is, among other things, related to the turbulence model chosen (in comparison with the k-e model, the RSM involves five more differential equations). The number of equations further depends on the character of the simulation whether it is 3-D, 21/2-D, or just 2-D (see below, under The domain and the grid ). In the case of two-phase flow simulations, the use of two-fluid models implies doubling the number of NS equations required for single-phase flow. All this may urge the development of more efficient solution algorithms. Recent developments in computer hardware (faster processors, parallel platforms) make this possible indeed. [Pg.171]

In the present case two algorithms for the best linear approximation on a discrete set were considered, one dealing with the Li norm and the other with the Lx norm (or Chebyshev approximation). The norm approximation consistently gave better results in comparison with the assumed initial molecular weight distributions. Therefore, the application of the Lx approximation was stopped, and all that follows relates to the Li approximation. In matrix notation Equation 13 may be expressed as ... [Pg.231]

Although no systematic comparisons of singular perturbation type algorithms with other methods have been carried out, the efficiency... [Pg.302]

None of the lighthouses in Fig. 4 will win awards, but we must still in some way assess their quality so that the algorithm can distinguish between them. The yardstick of quality for each individual is known as its fitness. This may be measured by the comparison of one individual with others in the same population, or by the extent to which the solution represented by an individual is able to satisfy some external requirement, such as being able to reproduce an experimental spectrum or, in this instance, to function effectively as a lighthouse. [Pg.12]

Theoretical modeling of the structure and reactivity of zeolitic materials, with special emphasis on the mechanism of catalytic reactions, has been the subject of several exhaustive review articles in the past decade. Theoretical approaches that have been used to describe such systems range from empirical molecular mechanics calculations to various ab initio methods as well as different variants of the mixed quantum/classical (QM/MM) algorithms. In the present contribution we focus our attention mainly on those studies which were accomplished by ab initio pseudopotential plane wave density functional methods that are able to treat three-dimensional periodic models of the zeolite catalysts. Where appropriate, we attempt a critical comparison of with other theoretical approaches. [Pg.78]


See other pages where Algorithm comparisons with other is mentioned: [Pg.192]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.876]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.876]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.2110]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.2308]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.727]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.137]   


SEARCH



Algorithms comparisons

© 2024 chempedia.info