Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adiabaticity, electron-transfer reactions nonadiabatic solvent effects

The Marcus theory, as described above, is a transition state theory (TST, see Section 14.3) by which the rate of an electron transfer process (in both the adiabatic and nonadiabatic limits) is assumed to be determined by the probability to reach a subset of solvent configurations defined by a certain value of the reaction coordinate. The rate expressions (16.50) for adiabatic, and (16.59) or (16.51) for nonadiabatic electron transfer were obtained by making the TST assumptions that (1) the probability to reach transition state configuration(s) is thermal, and (2) once the reaction coordinate reaches its transition state value, the electron transfer reaction proceeds to completion. Both assumptions rely on the supposition that the overall reaction is slow relative to the thermal relaxation of the nuclear environment. We have seen in Sections 14.4.2 and 14.4.4 that the breakdown of this picture leads to dynamic solvent effects, that in the Markovian limit can be characterized by a friction coefficient y The rate is proportional to y in the low friction, y 0, limit where assumption (1) breaks down, and varies like y when y oo and assumption (2) does. What stands in common to these situations is that in these opposing limits the solvent affects dynamically the reaction rate. Solvent effects in TST appear only through its effect on the free energy surface of the reactant subspace. [Pg.577]

Figure 9.6 Pressure-effect on rates of some self-exchange electron-transfer reactions between metal ions comparison of observed volumes of activation with values calculated from classical Marcus theory for adiabatic reactions. The plot shows calculated and observed AP values (cm mol ) at mid-range of pressure (100 MPa, except 70 MPa for Fe(H20)g ) for adiabatic (filled symbols) and nonadiabatic (open circles) self-exchange in couples with rigid ligands. Solvents (o, ) water ( ) CD3CN (A) (CD3)2CO (V) CD3OD. Key (A,B) (C,D) Cu(dmp)2 (E-G) Ru(hfac)j (H) Fe(C5H5)2 (I-K) Mn(CN-t-Bu)g ... Figure 9.6 Pressure-effect on rates of some self-exchange electron-transfer reactions between metal ions comparison of observed volumes of activation with values calculated from classical Marcus theory for adiabatic reactions. The plot shows calculated and observed AP values (cm mol ) at mid-range of pressure (100 MPa, except 70 MPa for Fe(H20)g ) for adiabatic (filled symbols) and nonadiabatic (open circles) self-exchange in couples with rigid ligands. Solvents (o, ) water ( ) CD3CN (A) (CD3)2CO (V) CD3OD. Key (A,B) (C,D) Cu(dmp)2 (E-G) Ru(hfac)j (H) Fe(C5H5)2 (I-K) Mn(CN-t-Bu)g ...

See other pages where Adiabaticity, electron-transfer reactions nonadiabatic solvent effects is mentioned: [Pg.387]    [Pg.1210]    [Pg.1209]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.333]   


SEARCH



Adiabatic electron transfer

Adiabatic reaction

Adiabatic transfer

Adiabaticity effects

Adiabaticity, electron-transfer reactions

Adiabaticity, electronic

Electron solvents

Electron transfer adiabaticity

Electron transfer adiabaticity effects

Electron transfer effect

Electron transfer reactions Adiabatic

Electron transfer solvent

Electron transfer solvent effect

Electron-transfer . nonadiabatic solvent

Electron-transfer reactions, solvent effects

Electronic nonadiabaticity

Electronically adiabatic

Electronically adiabatic reactions

Nonadiabatic Electron Transfer Reactions

Nonadiabatic electron transfer

Nonadiabatic reactions

Solvent transfer

© 2024 chempedia.info