Acidic solvents, differentiating effect

The ionization of the acid depends not only on the basicity of the solvent, but also on its dielectric constant and its ion-solvating ability. The dependence of the acidity and basicity constants of a compound on the basicity and acidity, respectively, of the solvents, leads to a distinction between leveling and differentiating solvents. When the solvent is a stronger base than water, its leveling effect will apply also to weaker acids. Similarly, strong bases will also have equal basicities in sufficiently acidic solvents. All bases stronger than the HO ion are adjusted to the basicity of this ion in water. 

Consequently there appears to be a sound empirical basis for the use of the OTs scale of solvent ionizing power. Its use should be restricted to sulphonates, however, because of the differential effects of electrophilic solvation in acidic solvents (see Section 4). The importance of these effects can be seen by comparing the Y and Iqxs values for carboxylic acids (Table 5) it appears that, relative to 80% ethanol/water, a carboxylic acid ionizes a tosylate about ten times more rapidly than a chloride. 

Other acids are differentiated [59] HBr > H2SO4 > HNO3 > HCl and picric acid. When the solvent is a stronger base than water, its levelling effect will apply also to weaker acids. Thus, in liquid ammonia, even the carboxylic acids are practically fully ionized. 

Differentiating effects are not solely attributable to the acidity or basicity of the solvent. In comparing acetic acid with ammonium ion, we find that the difference in pAT values is 4.48 in water but only 0.8 in methanol. In water the electrostatic energies of the ions are lower than in methanol because of its higher dielectric constant. This affects acetic acid, the ionisation of which creates ions, more than ammonium ion, for which ionisation merely shifts positive charge from NHJ to SH. In aprotic solvents specific solvation effects may be large and result in some differentiation. 

Determinations in non-aqueous solvents are of importance for substances which may give poor end points in normal aqueous titrations and for substances which are not soluble in water. They are also of particular value for determining the proportions of individual components in mixtures of either acids or of bases. These differential titrations are carried out in solvents which do not exert a levelling effect. 

The literature survey in this section suggests that the ideal in vitro permeability assay would have pH 6.0 and 7.4 in the donor wells, with pH 7.4 in the acceptor wells. (Such a two-pH combination could differentiate acids from bases and non-ionizables by the differences between the two Pe values.) Furthermore, the acceptor side would have 3% wt/vol BSA to maintain a sink condition (or some sinkforming equivalent). The donor side may benefit from having a bile acid (i.e., taurocholic or glycocholic, 5-15 mM), to solubilize the most lipophilic sample molecules. The ideal lipid barrier would have a composition similar to those in Table 3.1, with the membrane possessing a substantial negative charge (mainly from PI). Excessive DMSO/other co-solvents would be best avoided, due to their unpredictable effects. 

A selective heating in liquid/liquid systems was exploited by Strauss and coworkers in a Hofmann elimination reaction using a two-phase water/chloroform system (Fig. 2.10) [32]. The temperatures of the aqueous and organic phases under micro-wave irradiation were 110 and 55 °C, respectively, due to the different dielectric properties of the solvents (Table 2.3). This temperature differential prevented decomposition of the final product. Comparable conditions would be difficult to obtain using traditional heating methods. A similar effect has been observed by Hallberg and coworkers in the preparation of /3,/3-diarylated aldehydes by hydrolysis of enol ethers in a two-phase toluene/aqueous hydrochloric acid system [33],... 

Acetonitrile, acetone and dimethylformamide—these non-aqueous solvents exert a greater differential in the protophillic properties of many substances than in the corresponding aqueous solutions, due to the levelling effect of water in the latter solutions. Hence, the most acidic substance in aqueous solutions of a number of acids is the formation of the hydronium ion as shown below ... 

Nucleic acid structures also involve assembly events determined by differential solubilities of different molecular constituents. The stacking of purine and pyrimidine bases in the helical structures of DNA relies on hydrophobic effects, whereas the positioning of phosphate groups in contact with solvent reflects their hydrophilic nature. Secondary structures of RNA likewise are influenced by differential solubilities of polar and nonpolar constituents. 

Effect of nonaqueous solvents on acid-base properties of NGu) (Acidic in dimethyl-formamide, pyridine and acet basic in HAc and formic acid) 26) E. Ripper, Explosivst 17 (7), 145-51 (1969) Bt CA 72, 48454(1970) (a-and /3-Nitroguanidine) (Reinvestigation of both forms by IR UV, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA),... 

---