Acidic proton level

In addition to the acidic proton level, there is the basic proton level in basic aqueous solution which is represented by the unitary vacant proton level (the... 

Fig. 3-16. Acidic and basic proton levels in aqueous solution h (Hso /H20) = unitary energy of hydration of a standard gaseous proton to occupy the xmitary vacant acidic proton level 1h (H2cvoh-) = unitary energy of hydration of a standard gaseous proton to occupy the unitary vacant basic proton level Dh o = ionic dissociation energy of HjO.

In the same way as the acidic proton level, the unitary proton acceptor level H (OH-,A) of OH" ion is equal to the unitary proton donor level cih.chjo.d) of H2O molecule ... 

Since acetic acid is a weak add with its unitary proton level (HAc/Ac") lower than the unitary addic proton level (H30 /H20), the proton moves from the unitary occupied acidic proton level to the unitary vacant proton level of acetic acid, thereby reducing the concentration of H3O" ions toward the acetic acid. Contrastively, in strong adds such as hydrochloric add whose unitary proton level (HC1/C1 ) is higher than the unitary addic proton level, the proton moves from the occupied proton level of hydrochloric acid to the vacant level of acidic proton ( H30 /H20 ), thereby increasing the concentration of H3O ions. 

It is interesting to point out the similarity between the proton level diagram of aqueous solutions and the electron level diagram of semiconductors as shown in Fig. 3-20. The ionic dissodation energy (1.03 eV) of water molecule H2O to form an ion pair of H30 -0H is the energy gap between the imitary acidic proton level and the unitary basic proton level this may correspond to the band gap of semiconductors. The concentration product, of the addic... 

Fig. 3-20. Comparison of the proton level diagram of aqueous solutions with the electron level diagram of semiconductors (a) proton levels in pure water, (b) electron levels in intrinsic semiconductors, (c) proton levels in week add solutions, (d) electron levels in n type semiconductors. = proton level in aqueous solutions = unitary acidic proton level of HaO /HjO = unitary basic proton level of HjO/OH" nij. , = unitary...

In aqueous solutions containing impurity solutes, the proton level approaches either the unitary acidic proton level > mog-) with increasing concentration... 

Fig. 9-22. Unitary proton levels of hydrated and adsorbed hydronium ions (acidic proton) and of hydrated and adsorbed water molecules (basic proton) the left side is the occupied proton level (the real potential of acidic protons), and the right side is the vacant proton level. Hi/HjO) = unitary occupied proton level of adsorbed hydronium ions (acidic proton level) H20.d = unitary vacant proton level of adsorbed hydronium ions (acidic proton level) and unitary occupied proton level of adsorbed water molecules (basic proton level) OH = unitary vacant proton level of adsorbed water molecules (basic proton level) (pHi, ) = hydrated proton level at iso-electric point pR...

For metal oxide electrodes, the iso-electric point pH p is also located midway between the unitary acidic proton level and the unitary basic proton level of adsorbed water. Table 9-1 shows the iso-electric point pHi, of several metal oxides in aqueous solutions. 

Different Types of Proton Transfers. Molecular Ions. The Electrostatic Energy. The ZwiUertons of Amino Acids. Aviopro-tolysis of the Solvent. The Dissociation Constant of a Weak Acid. Variation of the Equilibrium Constant with Temperature. Proton Transfers of Class I. Proton Transfers of Classes II, III, and IV. The Temperature at Which In Kx Passes through Its Maximum. Comparison between Theory and Experiment. A Chart of Occupied and Vacant Proton Levels. 

The Dissociation Constant of Nitric Acid. The largest value of K in Table 9 is that for the (HS04) ion. In Fig. 36 there is a gap of more than 0.2 electron-volt below the level of the (H30)1 ion. As is well known, several acids exist which in aqueous solution fall iu the intermediate region between the very weak acids and the recognized strong acids the proton levels of these acids will fall in this gap. The values of K for these acids obtained by different methods seldom show close agreement. Results obtained by various methods were compared in 1946 by Redlich,1 who discussed the difficulties encountered. 

This is 0.22 electron-volt greater than the value of J for nitric acid in water. The relative positions of the proton levels in methanol, using this value, is shown in Fig. 65. 

If then we construct a tentative diagram for the proton levels in formic acid solution, the gap between the vacant level of (JICOO)- and the occupied level of HjO will be a little wider than in Fig. 36. This has been shown in Fig. 65. 

This value, which is only about half as large as the corresponding quantity for water or methanol, has been used in constructing Fig. 65 for the proton levels in formic acid. 

Furthermore, since in Sec. 121 we found the value J = 0.36 electron-volt for the proton transfer (211), this gives the occupied proton level of the (HCOOII2)+ ion a position at (0.52 — 0.36) = 0.16 electron-volt above that of the (H30)+ ion in formic acid as solvent. This is shown in Fig. 65, where, for comparison, a diagram for proton levels in aqueous solution has been included, the level of the (H30)+ ion in aqueous solution being drawn opposite to the level of the same ion in formic acid solution. This choice is quite arbitrary, but was made in order to show more clearly that we may expect that one or more acids that are strong... 

It is found that IIC1 is likewise incompletely dissociated in formic acid solution. There do not appear to be any accurate data on the degree of dissociation so we do not know whether it is necessary to place the proton level of HC1 below that of (H30)+ in formic acid solution. 

If the occupied proton level of the CH3COOH molecule dissolved in liquid ammonia lies above the vacant level of NH3, as it does in aqueous solution, acetic acid should be a strong acid in liquid ammonia. This is found to be the case the carboxylic acids are strong acids in this solvent, the protons being transferred to NH3 to form (NH4)+. 

Let us now ask where the vacant proton level must lie, in order that an indicator molecule shall be suitable for use in a very dilute acid solution —where the ratio [Ha0+]/[H20] will be very small compared with unity. According to (216) in order that [BH+]/[B] shall be near unity, obviously J must have a large negative value in other words, the vacant proton level of the molecule B must lie considerably below the occupied proton level of (HaO)+ otherwise, an insufficient crop of (BII)+ ions will be obtained. 

In Sec. 128 it was found that the vacant proton level of indicator 2 lies at 0.192 electron-volt below the occupied level of (HaO)+ in dilute aqueous solution. Using the successive increments listed in the last column of Table 39, we find, counting upward, that the value for indicator 5 is —0.052, referred to the same zero of energy. Proceeding by the same stepwise method to No. 6 we find for the energy of the vacant proton level the positive value +0.038. This still refers to the occupied level of the (II30)+ ion in dilute aqueous solution. It means that work equal to 0.038 electron-volt would be required to transfer a proton from the (H30)+ ion in very dilute solution to the vacant level of No. 6 in the concentrated acid solution in which the measurements were made. A further amount of work would be required to transfer the proton from the occupied level of No. 6 to the vacant proton level of one of the H2O molecules in the same concentrated solution. This is the situation because, as mentioned above, the changing environment has raised the proton level of the (HaO)+ ion relative to that of each of the indicator molecules. 

When considering CEC or AEC, the pH of the soil solution is extremely important. There will be competition for binding sites between H30+ and other cations in the soil solution. Therefore, the observed CEC will be lower at high proton concentrations, that is, at low or acid pH levels, and higher at basic pH levels. For analytical measurements, the CEC of soil at the pH being used for extraction is the important value, not a CEC determined at a higher or lower pH. 

The AG molecule is converted to a strong acid (AH) upon absorption of a photon and the rate of this reaction is fast, with the extent of reaction being governed by the quantum effeciency of the particular acid generator and flux. The acid proton affects the desired deprotection reaction (4) with a finite rate constant. This rate is a function of the acid concentration, [H4-], the temperature and most importantly, the diffusion rate of the acid in the polymer matrix. The diffusion rate in turn, depends on the temperature and the polarity of the polymer matirx. At room temperature, the rate of this reaction is typically slow and it is generally necessary to heat the film to well above room temperature to increase reaction rates and/or diffusion to acceptable levels. The acid (H+) is regenerated (reaction 4) and continues to be available for subsequent reaction, hence the amplification nature of the system. 

Fig. 3-16. Hie unitary levels of acidic proton HgOVIIjO and basic proton HgO/OH in pure water, and proton transfer between two levels Copl = occupied proton level cvpl = vacant proton level fiH cHgo-. D) = unitary occupied (donor) level of acidic proton, 1h (H20.a> = unitary vacant (acceptor) level of acidic proton.

The energy level of hydrated proton depends on the proton concentration. For an acidic proton in Eqn. 3-32 and a basic proton in Eqn. 3-34, the proton levels Hh- are, respectively, given in Eqns. 3-37 and 3-38 ... 

In general, the acidic and basic proton hydration processes may occur simultaneously giving the same proton level for both the acidic and the basic protons. In pure liquid water where WHgo- = Woh- io electroneutrality, the proton level is obtained from Eqns. 3-39 and 3-40 as shown in Eqn. 3-41 ... 

---