Zn -porphyrins

A poly(L-lysine) dendrimer 23 which carries 16 free-base porphyrins in one hemisphere and 16 Zn porphyrins in the other has been synthesized and studied in dimethylformamide solution [54]. In such a dendrimer, energy transfer from the Zn porphyrins to the free-base units can occur with 43% efficiency. When the 32 free base and zinc porphyrins were placed in a scrambled fashion, the efficiency of energy transfer was estimated to be 83% [55]. Very efficient (98%) energy transfer from Zn to free-base porphyrins was also observed in a rigid, snowflake-shaped structure in which three Zn porphyrin units alternate with three free-base porphyrin units [56]. 

A comparison between two families of dendrimers containing polyfaryl ether) dendrons and either a Zn porphyrin (GnPZn) or a tetraphenylporphyrin (G/JTPPH2) core up to the fourth generation (30 and 31) shows that the core... 

Porphyrin complexes are particularly suitable cores to construct dendrimers and to investigate how the behavior of an electroactive species is modified when surrounded by dendritic branches. In particular, dendritic porphyrins can be regarded as models for electron-transfer proteins like cytochrome c [42, 43]. Electrochemical investigation on Zn-porphyrins bearing polyether-amide branches has shown that the first reduction and oxidation processes are affected by the electron-rich microenvironment created by the dendritic branches [42]. Furthermore, for the third generation compound all the observed processes become irreversible. 

Why, we may ask, does nature use Mg2+ as the metal to capture solar energy Perhaps, as has been suggested by Frausto da Silva and Williams (2001), the reasons are that Mg2+ does not have the redox properties of other metal ions such as Mn, Co, Fe, Ni and Cu when inserted into a porphyrin, and that it does not enhance fluorescence as much as the corresponding Zn porphyrin would. 

J. Wakamatsu, T. Nishimura and A. Hattori, A Zn-porphyrin complex contributes to the bright red color in Parma ham. Meat Sci. 67 (2004) 95-100. 

The intramolecular electron transfer kg, subsequent to the rapid reduction, must occur because the Ru(III)-Fe(II) pairing is the stable one. It is easily monitored using absorbance changes which occur with reduction at the Fe(III) heme center. Both laser-produced Ru(bpy)3 and radicals such as CO (from pulse radiolysis (Prob. 15)) are very effective one-electron reductants for this task (Sec. 3.5).In another approach," the Fe in a heme protein is replaced by Zn. The resultant Zn porphyrin (ZnP) can be electronically excited to a triplet state, ZnP which is relatively long-lived (x = 15 ms) and is a good reducing agent E° = —0.62 V). Its decay via the usual pathways (compare (1.32)) is accelerated by electron transfer to another metal (natural or artificial) site in the protein e. g.. 

Monomer (mZnPn) and dimer (dZnPn) Zn porphyrins. Porphyrins in dimers covalently linked by two 4-, 5-, or 6-atom long chains. Measurements performed at 1.3 K. (8)... 

The heterometallic system [(bpy)2Ru(234)] exhibits several intramolecular energy-transfer processes (i) ultrafast singlet-to-singlet transfer, (ii) fast triplet-to-singlet transfer and (iii) singlet-to-triplet transfer. Excitation into the Ru(bpy)3 " " domain is followed by rapid energy transfer to the triplet state of the Zn(porphyrin) fragment. There is no evidence for intramolecular electron transfer between the Ru(bpy)3 and Zn(porphyrin) units. 

In such vesicle systems, the electrons are transported through the membrane. Electron carriers such as quinones or alloxazines in the vesicle wall enhance remarkably the rate of photoinduced charge separation. The vesicle system shown in Fig. 6 contains the surfactant Zn-porphyrine complex (ZnC12TPyP) in the wall 23). 

Warnmark et al. [12] have reported the formation of a dynamic supramolecular catalytic system involving a hydrogen bonding complex between a Mn(ll I) salen and a Zn(II) porphyrin (Figure 1.4). The salen sub-unit acts as the catalytic center for the catalytic epoxidation of olefins while the Zn-porphyrin component performs as the binding site. The system exhibits low selectivity for pyridine-appended styrene derivatives over phenyl-appended derivatives in a catalytic epoxidation reaction. The... 

Energy transfer in light-harvesting Zn porphyrin dendrimers... 

In the present study we investigated energy transfer between the Zn-porphyrin units in a sequence of dendrimers varying in size from 4 to 64 porphyrin units (Fig. 1). Reference measurements were performed on the monomer, P1D1. In order to follow energy transfer within the dendrimers, the fluorescence anisotropy decay were analysed. To determine the lifetime of the dendrimers, additional analysis of the kinetics measured at magic angle was performed. The fluorescence anisotropy is defined by... 

Energy transfer in jight-b rvesting Zn porphyrin dcndrimcrs... 

It is possible that in the Fe system, the donor wavefunction is highy localized at the iron, whereas in the excited state Zn porphyrin, the electron is clearly widely delocalized around the ring If this were true, then the "effective" distance for the Fe reaction would be ca ... 

Photoinduced intramolecular electron tunneling was observed also in some other porphyrin containing bridge molecules, such as porphyrin covalently linked to phenolphthalein [308], dimethylaniline — mesoporphyrin II — quinone triad [309], Zn porphyrin-viologen-quinone triad [310], carotenoid — porphyrin -diquinone tetrad [311]. The influence of conformational state of porphyrin-viologen bridge molecules on the rate of PET reactions was studied in Ref. [312]. 

The temperature dependence of the rate constant of electron transfer over large distance from the first triplet state of Zn porphyrin to Rum(NH3)5 covalently attached to histidine-33 in Zn-substituted cytc was studied in Ref. [318]. A temperature independent triplet quenching process with the rate constant 3.6 s-1, was observed at 10-100 K and tentatively attributed to electron transfer facilitated by nuclear tunneling. 

As follows from the data from Sect. 2, the primary photochemical stage in the majority of the membrane systems studied is the redox quenching of the excited photosensitizer by an electron acceptor or donor leading to electron transfer across the membrane // water interface. For electron transfer to occur from the membrane-embedded photosensitizer to the water soluble acceptor, it is necessary for the former to be located sufficiently close to the membrane surface, though the direct contact of the photosensitizer with the aqueous phase is not obligatory. For example, Tsuchida et al. [147] have shown that electron transfer to MV2 + from photoexcited Zn-porphyrin inserted into the lecithin membrane, is observed only until the distance from the porphyrin ring to the membrane surface does not exceed about 12 A. 

Unfortunately, the experimental data concerning the distances at which electron exchange reactions in the membranes take place are very scarce. Tsuchida et al. have shown [147], that even when the photoexcited Zn porphyrin embedded in the membrane cannot approach the membrane // water interface closer than 12 A, the electron transfer is still possible to MV2+ located in the water phase outside the membrane. However, when the distance of the closest approach of these reactants is increased up to 17 A, the electron transfer is totally stopped. Examples of electron transfer proceeding presumably via electron tunneling across molecular layers about 20 A thick, which separate electron donor and acceptor molecules, can be found in papers by Mobius [230, 231] and Kuhn [232, 233]. Note, that in... 

---