Zeeman effect relative intensities

In these expressions, p is an arbitrary coefficient that measures the strength of the electric-field mechanism compared to qne based on an inhomogeneous dielectric. The values of CK can be worked out once the polar angles of any one of the three igands is specified. For example, ell - cos. The components for which M = 1 are mixed with those for which M = T 2 in C v symmetry, but if the relative mixtures are known (as they could be from Zeeman-effect data), a measurement of the three intensities would, in principle, determine p and also check the expressions above for consistency. 

Fig. 10.9. The Ba spectrum in a high magnetic field with the motional Stark field compensated. The data are obtained in atomic beam experiments, and the relative intensities do not suffer from opacity or saturation effects. Both circular polarisations are separated experimentally, and are found to have the same structure (shown by presenting them as though reflected in the axis) when displaced in energy by the linear Zeeman splitting.

To analyze the recorded spectra, the spectrometer needs to be calibrated. The three main calibration parameters are the velocity scale, the center point of the spectrum and the nonlinearity of the velocity/time profile of the oscillation compared to a standard reference. The calibration is performed using a spectrum recorded from an a-iron foil at room temperature using the well defined line positions of the sextet from a-iron, which occur at 5.312mms , 3.076mms , and 0.840mms The center of this a-iron spectrum at room temperature is taken as the reference point (0.0 nun s ) for isomer shift values of sample spectra. The typical Mossbauer spectrum of the 14.4 keV transition of Fe in natural iron (Fig. 4.10) represents a simple example of pure nuclear Zeeman effect. Because of the cubic symmetry of the iron lattice, there is no quadrupole shift of the nuclear energy levels. The relative intensities of the six magnetic dipole transitions are... 

In the early stages of development, the graphite atomizers suffered from relatively low analytical precision, severe chemical interferences and from the intense background signals. With the introduction of the L vov platform and Zeeman-effect background correction considerable improvements have been made with respect to these deficiencies. The L vov platform placed inside the graphite tube (first proposed by L vov in 1978) is mainly heated by atomization from the tube wall as the temperature increases. Atomization of the sample from the platform delays atomization until near isothermal gas-phase conditions are present... 

All of the flicker noises can be effectively eliminated by the use of double-beam optics in conjunction with a background correction system such as Zeeman splitting or a well-aligned (or wavelength-modulated) continuum source. Thus the ultimate limiting noise in atomic absorption is source shot noise, which can be reduced (relative to total source intensity or I, ) by increasing the source intensity, up to the point of optical saturation. 

---