Yield to worst

Yield to worst This represents the most conservative yield measure. This is the minimum between the yield to maturity and yield to call for any date. 

There are several yield measures commonly quoted by dealers and traders in the bond market. Among the more prominent are current yield, yield to maturity, yield to call, yield to worst, and cash flow yield. In this section, we will demonstrate how to compute various yield measures for a bond given its price. We will also highlight their limitations as measures of potential return. 

A yield can be calculated for every possible call date. Additionally, a yield to maturity can be calculated. The lowest of all these possible yields is called the yield to worst. 

Because a callable bond has more than one possible redemption date, its future cash flows are not clearly defined. To calculate the yield to maturity for such a bond, it is necessary to assume a particular redemption date. The market convention is to use the earliest possible one if the bond is priced above par and the latest possible one if it is priced below par. Yield calculated in this way is sometimes referred to as yield to worst (the Bloomberg term). 

Any models using implied forward rates to generate future prices for options underlying bonds would be assuming that the future interest rates implied by the current yield curve will actually occur. An analysis built on this assumption would, like yield-to-worst analysis, be inaccurate, because the yield curve does not remain static and neither do the rates implied by it therefore future rates can never be known with certainty. To avoid this inaccuracy, a binomial tree model assumes that interest rates fluctuate over time. These models... 

Inverse gas chromatography parameters can also be applied in the field of cafaly-sis. In fhis way, as example, parent NaX and CaA zeolites, as well as transition metal (Co +, Mn +, Fe " )-exchanged zeolites, were evaluated for the catalytic oxidation of n-hexane. It was observed [51, 52], that although there was linear correlation between the acidity and the adsorption enthalpy of the n-hexane, there was no relationship between the acidity and the activity for n-hexane oxidation. However, if a reactivity parameter (such as Tso, temperature at which 50 % of conversion is attained) is plotted versus the adsorption heat, a so-called Volcano plot is obtained (Fig. 16.12), an optimum value of (-AH ) being observed, higher and lower values yielding to worst catalytic performance. 

Many otherwise excellent literature reviews are heavily overweighted with homeland references. Probably this stems much more from convenient propinquity than from willful neglect of foreign literature. Americans sometimes think German and Russian reviews are the worst offenders, but actually this yielding to the easy way is more or less world-wide. 

FIGURE 40.3 Heart rate corrected QT versus heart rate. Four methods are apphed to the same data set. From the resulting slopes, QTcI (individual correction method) provided the best correction. The Bazett method yields the worst correction. 

A correction was applied for this reduction in -OH yield to each point in the competition plot. If this correction were not applied, it would lead at the worst to a 17% overestimation in the absolute rate constant for OH attack on uracil. 

The number in parenthesis in the third and fourth columns indicates the number of ill-conditioned parameters, that is, the number of parameters whose uncertainties are larger than their absolute values. The results indicates that the HKF model gives the worst results, being the pressure dependent terms in Equation (2.80) redundant (the correlation is better taking 2= 4= 0). Equations based on water compressibility improve the correlation and yield to similar... 

When the test solution is quantitated by extrapolation it is first noticed that the differences in the predicted concentration when Add2 suffers from some signal modification are lower than those for Add 1 and Add3 (with respect to the unmodified extrapolation). They vary at most by 2.2 ppb, <4% (Table 2.5). When the signal of Addl was modified, the predictions varied by up to 8 ppb (14%, see Table 2.4). On the contrary, signal variations in Add3 yielded the worst situation because the concentrations differed by up to 17ppb (31% Table 2.6). 

It may be worth to notice that PBE, PBEsol and LDA are the methods having the largest median absolute deviation from the median, being 2-3 times worse than the winner, PBEO. Furthermore, Hartree-Fock is the method yielding the worst mean absolute error (6.1 eV, 1 eV larger than the worst method containing a density functional approximation). 

Many people view the Skraup/Doebner-von Miller reaction as the worst witch s brew of all the heterocyclic syntheses. The reaction can be violently exothermic. A variety of oxidizing reagents and additives have been added in an effort to improve yields, including iron (III) and tin (IV) salts, nitrobenzenes, iodine and various acids such as boric and arsenic. Cohn s conditions for the Skraup reaction using an iron salt and boric acid in concentrated sulfuric acid are frequently employed. ... 

The design of the system must take into account possible variation of critical control parameters that could affect performance. The maximum performance of the process should be defined by a reasonable safety margin. In order to comply with cGMP guidelines, established validation protocols, and parameters should allow the process to achieve reproducible purity and yield under stressed conditions. This implies that the industrial SMB system must be stressed to simulate worst-case conditions for process validation. 

---