Wilhelmy plate method advantages

What advantages does this (RIFS) technique have over the Wilhelmy plate method ... 

These equations may be compared with those for cylinders, see for instance [1.3.21. For flat plates one does not have to worry about complications of the details of the profile, but this advantage is offset by the much lower rise. Typically, h is of order i.e. h = O (mm) and y is proportional to whereas it scales with ah in capillaries. Over the last few decades laser-optical techniques for scanning the meniscus and establishing h down to about 10" mm have become available In a modem variant of the Wilhelmy plate technique, to be described in sec. 1.8a, the force needed to pull the plate out of the liquid is measured as a function of the height above the zero level. In this way the surface tension and contact angle can be determined simultaneously. Alternatively, the method can be used to obtain contact angles, i.e. from [1.3.161 after y has been measured by some other technique. 

The force at the barrier may be measured directly by a calibrated torsion wire that is mechanically attached to the barrier. However, nowadays the surface tensions at both sides of the barrier are measured Independently using one of the appropriate methods in sec. 1.8, mostly by the static Wilhelmy plate technique. The latter method has the advantage that einy leakage of monolayer material across the barrier can be easUy detected. 

The advantages of the Wilhelmy method are obvious. The measurement of contact angles is replaced by the measurement of an applied force on a plate, which can be performed with much higher accuracy and objectivity than directly reading the contact angle from a goniometer. The reproducibility of the results is only limited by two factors, i.e. (i) the constancy of the perimeter p of the cross-section of the plate, and (ii) the... 

---