Weathering laboratory testing

In weathering laboratory testing devices the samples are mounted in two ways ... 

In practice, for constructions exposed to bad weather, laboratory tests can predict a possible risk of galvanic corrosion and determine the efficiency of the planned protection. 

Quality Control and Testing. Control of inks is done by examining their color strength, hue, tack, rheology, drying rate, stabiHty, and product resistance. Elaborate control equipment and laboratory testing procedures are employed to test the finished inks. Weather-Ometers,... 

Recent interest in weathering steels has stimulated work on accelerated laboratory tests which can be used to investigate the effect of alloy composition on performance. It is well established that a wetting and drying cycle should be an integral part of any laboratory test in which the characteristic properties of weathering steels are revealed , and Bromley, Kilcullen and... 

Since weather varies from day to day, year to year, and place to place, no precise correlation exists between artificial laboratory weathering and natural outdoor weathering. However, standard laboratory test conditions produce results with acceptable reproducibility and in general agreement with data obtained from long-time outdoor exposures. 

Ardau, C., Blowes, D.W., Ptacek, C.J. 2009. Comparison of laboratory testing protocols to field observations of the weathering of sulfide-bearing mine tailings. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 100, 182-191. Bowell, R.J. Parshley, J.V. 2005. 

Many accelerated laboratory tests have been devised to determine the susceptibility of paint films to breakdown by atmospheric weathering, however, the demand for a generally applicable test exists. In this study different typical paint systems have been subjected to various natural environments and laboratory tests (DEF-1053 Method No. 26,... 

Rock properties should be examined at as many outcrops as possible, looking for friability, cementing, degree and nature of fractures and dissolution conduits, and animal burrowing (Figs. 2.3, 2.4, 2.8, and 3.2). However, one should bear in mind that rocks at exposures are altered by weathering and joint formation due to stress release and thus may poorly represent the rocks at depth. Similar observations may be conducted on drill cores, but these are expensive and their record is limited in size. Laboratory tests on cores provide semiquantitative data on the nature of rock pores and fissures and conductivities. 

Fade and weather resistance can also be evaluated using laboratory test chambers, fadometers, and weatherometers, designed to simulate a variety of actual environments in an accelerated fashion. The types of tests are classified according to the nature of the light source ... 

There are various accelerated light stability test methods available and/or exposure in harsher climates (Florida, Arizona) to test the weathering performance. The prediction of photoageing stability based on accelerated laboratory testing is very difficult, but some attempts have been made for PVC-P (445). The most relevant point is to use as reference a formulation known to have good outdoor weathering performance. 

On the basis of this evidence, it is recommended that an experimental test program, consisting of both laboratory and field tests, be developed and Implemented to quantitatively measure the effects of acid deposition on both the as thetic and structural properties of PCC structures. It is, however, recommended that a preliminary series of controlled, accelerated laboratory tests be carried out before a full-scale field evaluation program is instituted. The objectives of the accelerated laboratory test program should be to identify the magnitude of the problem and to attempt to differentiate between the effects of wet deposition, dry deposition, and normal weathering. The preliminary test program should concentrate on surface chemistry effects and penetration rates of SO4, NOx, Cl as deposited from wet and dry deposition. The... 

Most laboratory tests are used routinely to provide relatively rapid results. They serve as a model to mimie eonditions foimd in praetiee. However many procedures are not reliable in this respeet, sinee they do not take aeeount of faetors sueh as the degree of soiling, the potential level of eontamination, presence of cleaning residues, inereased smfaee area eaused by abrasion, the age, exposure to weather and so on. 

Information on the natural weathering behaviour of joints is very useful. By combining this information with data from accelerated laboratory tests, some realistic predictions of service-lifetime may be made. Theoretical models of the pattern of bondline saturation of joints as a function of time of environmental exposure provide a useful appreciation of the possible extent of problems (e.g. Fig. 4.21). The process of joint failure, as observed in practice or in the laboratory, is frequently non-diagnostic i.e. it rarely reveals the true cause, or the series of stages, leading to deterioration or failure. 

Corrosion rate of weathering steels was found lower with respect to mild steels in accelerated laboratory tests. They corrode most rapidly with respect to field exposure test... 

The data generated with accelerated laboratory tests on both coated and uncoated mild steels and weathering steels are grossly insufficient to predict field behaviour. 

Present research work has been carried out in two parts field exposme tests and accelerated laboratory tests on unexposed panels. Under field exposme test three representative sites PI very close to sea shore and free firom SO2, P2 away from sea with presence of SO2 and P3 industrial environment with presence SO2 were chosen. Analytical techniques (EDX, XRD and Raman spectroscopy) were used for rust characterisation and SEM was employed for understanding the morphological state. Corrosion rates were estimated after different periods of exposure at sites. It is found that though accelerated laboratory test can predict the general trend of corrosion, actual field test data cannot be created in laboratory. So an attempt was made to simulate protective rust coating in the laboratory that is typical of field exposure protective rust formation on weathering steel. 

Rust formed in continuous humidity test on weathering steel was not stable and protective. Again WS developed more protective oxide than MS when exposed in humid SO2 for longer period. No damage of coating was noted with initial exposure of 18 months on coated MS and WS. The data generated with accelerated laboratory tests on both coated and uncoated MS and WS panels have wide gap and difiicult to predict the performance in field exposure. 

The UV energy in sunlight varies in wavelength distribution and intensity with the time of day and year as well as latitude and elevation of exposure. The presence of water also depends on the region, time of year, etc. Therefore, predicting natural weather resistance from laboratory tests can be difficult. 

---