Wave functions covalent

The wave function T i oo ( = 11 / = 0, w = 0) corresponds to a spherical electronic distribution around the nucleus and is an example of an s orbital. Solutions of other wave functions may be described in terms of p and d orbitals, atomic radii Half the closest distance of approach of atoms in the structure of the elements. This is easily defined for regular structures, e.g. close-packed metals, but is less easy to define in elements with irregular structures, e.g. As. The values may differ between allo-tropes (e.g. C-C 1 -54 A in diamond and 1 -42 A in planes of graphite). Atomic radii are very different from ionic and covalent radii. 

The UHE wave function can also apply to singlet molecules. Usually, the results are the same as for the faster RHEmethod. That is, electrons prefer to pair, with an alpha electron sharing a molecular space orbital with a beta electron. Use the UHE method for singlet states only to avoid potential energy discontinuities when a covalent bond is broken and electrons can unpair (see Bond Breaking on page 46). 

If a covalent bond is broken, as in the simple case of dissociation of the hydrogen molecule into atoms, then theRHFwave function without the Configuration Interaction option (see Extending the Wave Function Calculation on page 37) is inappropriate. This is because the doubly occupied RHFmolecular orbital includes spurious terms that place both electrons on the same hydrogen atom, even when they are separated by an infinite distance. 

Semiconductor materials are rather unique and exceptional substances (see Semiconductors). The entire semiconductor crystal is one giant covalent molecule. In benzene molecules, the electron wave functions that describe probabiUty density ate spread over the six ting-carbon atoms in a large dye molecule, an electron might be delocalized over a series of rings, but in semiconductors, the electron wave-functions are delocalized, in principle, over an entire macroscopic crystal. Because of the size of these wave functions, no single atom can have much effect on the electron energies, ie, the electronic excitations in semiconductors are delocalized. 

The first two terms on the right-hand side have both eleetrons on the same eentre, they describe ionic contributions to the wave function, H+H . The later two terms describe covalent contributions to the wave function, H H. The HF wave function thus contains equal amounts of ionic and covalent contributions. The full Cl wave function may be written in terms of AOs as... 

Consider now the behaviour of the HF wave function 0 (eq. (4.18)) as the distance between the two nuclei is increased toward infinity. Since the HF wave function is an equal mixture of ionic and covalent terms, the dissociation limit is 50% H+H " and 50% H H. In the gas phase all bonds dissociate homolytically, and the ionic contribution should be 0%. The HF dissociation energy is therefore much too high. This is a general problem of RHF type wave functions, the constraint of doubly occupied MOs is inconsistent with breaking bonds to produce radicals. In order for an RHF wave function to dissociate correctly, an even-electron molecule must break into two even-electron fragments, each being in the lowest electronic state. Furthermore, the orbital symmetries must match. There are only a few covalently bonded systems which obey these requirements (the simplest example is HHe+). The wrong dissociation limit for RHF wave functions has several consequences. 

The classical VB wave function, on the other hand, is build from the atomic fragments by coupling the unpaired electrons to form a bond. In the H2 case, the two electrons are coupled into a singlet pair, properly antisymmetrized. The simplest VB description, known as a Heitler-London (HL) function, includes only the two covalent terms in the HF wave function. 

The HF wave funetion eontains equal amounts of ionie and eovalent eontributions (Section 4.3), For covalently bonded systems, like H2O, the HF wave funetion is too ionie, and the effect of electron correlation is to increase the covalent contribution. Since the ionic dissociation limit is higher in energy than the covalent, the effect is that the equiUbrium bond length increases when correlation methods are used. For dative bonds, such as metal-ligand compounds, the situation is reversed. In this case the HF wave function dissociates correctly, and bond lengths are normally too long. Inclusion of... 

Molecular orbital (MO) theory describes covalent bond formation as arising from a mathematical combination of atomic orbitals (wave functions) on different atoms to form molecular orbitals, so called because they belong to the entire molecule rather than to an individual atom. Just as an atomic orbital, whether un hybridized or hybridized, describes a region of space around an atom where an electron is likely to be found, so a molecular orbital describes a region of space in a molecule where electrons are most likely to be found. 

Molecular orbital (MO) theory (Section 1.11) A description of covalent bond formation as resulting from a mathematical combination of atomic orbitals (wave functions) to form molecular orbitals. 

The method of superposition of configurations as well as the method of different orbitals for different spins belong within the framework of the one-electron scheme, but, as soon as one introduces the interelectronic distance rijt a two-electron element has been accepted in the theory. In treating the covalent chemical bond and other properties related to electron pairs, it may actually seem more natural to consider two-electron functions as the fundamental building stones of the total wave function, and such a two-electron scheme has also been successfully developed (Hurley, Lennard-Jones, and Pople 1953, Schmid 1953). 

A roughly equivalent valence-bond theory would result from allowing the 2s electron of each lithium atom to be involved in the formation of a covalent bond with one of the neighbouring atoms. The wave function for the crystal would be... 

Accounting for electron correlation in a second step, via the mixing of a limited number of Slater determinants in the total wave function. Electron correlation is very important for correct treatment of interelectronic interactions and for a quantitative description of covalence effects and of the structure of multielec-tronic states. Accounting completely for the total electronic correlation is computationally extremely difficult, and is only possible for very small molecules, within a limited basis set. Formally, electron correlation can be divided into static, when all Slater determinants corresponding to all possible electron populations of frontier orbitals are considered, and dynamic correlation, which takes into account the effects of dynamical screening of interelectron interaction. 

A simple interpretation of the nature of a covalent bond can be seen by considering some simple adaptations of the wave function. For example, it is ifi1 that is related to probability of finding the electrons. When we write the wave function for a bonding molecular orbital as ipb, that means that because... 

Atoms do not all have the same ability to attract electrons. When two different types of atoms form a covalent bond by sharing a pair of electrons, the shared pair of electrons will spend more time in the vicinity of the atom that has the greater ability to attract them. In other words, the electron pair is shared, but it is not shared equally. The ability of an atom in a molecule to attract electrons to it is expressed as the electronegativity of the atom. Earlier, for a homonuclear diatomic molecule we wrote the combination of two atomic wave functions as... 

The actual structure of HF can be represented as a composite of the covalent structure H-F, in which there is equal sharing of the bonding electron pair, and the ionic structure H+ F, where there is complete transfer of an electron from H to F. Therefore, the wave function for the HF molecule wave function can be written in terms of the wave functions for those structures as... 

The wave function for this system can be written as a linear combination of two VB states, which represent the ionic Bu+Cl- and the covalent Bu-Cl resonance structures, namely... 

The values of cion and c ,v determine the weights of the respective components, and reflect the relative stabilization of the VB states in solution e g. a polar solvent is expected to stabilize the ionic TBu+Cl-) relative to the covalent x Bu-Cl). By contrast, the HF wave function for BuCl is the (normalized) Slater determinant[22]... 

---