Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Wave-function based methods coupled cluster

In order to use wave-function-based methods to converge to the true solution of the Schrodinger equation, it is necessary to simultaneously use a high level of theory and a large basis set. Unfortunately, this approach is only feasible for calculations involving relatively small numbers of atoms because the computational expense associated with these calculations increases rapidly with the level of theory and the number of basis functions. For a basis set with N functions, for example, the computational expense of a conventional HF calculation typically requires N4 operations, while a conventional coupled-cluster calculation requires N7 operations. Advances have been made that improve the scaling of both FIF and post-HF calculations. Even with these improvements, however you can appreciate the problem with... [Pg.26]

Two relevant topics have been ignored completely in this short chapter the treatment of electron correlation with more sophisticated methods than DFT (that remains unsatisfactory from many points of view) and the related subject of excited states. Wave function-based methods for the calculation of electron correlation, like the perturbative Moller-Plesset (MP) expansion or the coupled cluster approximation, have registered an impressive advancement in the molecular context. The computational cost increases with the molecular size (as the fifth power in the most favorable cases), especially for molecules with low symmetry. That increase was the main disadvantage of these electron correlation methods, and it limited their application to tiny molecules. This scaling problem has been improved dramatically by modern reformulation of the theory by localized molecular orbitals, and now a much more favorable scaling is possible with the appropriate approximations. Linear scaling with such low prefactors has been achieved with MP schemes that the... [Pg.5]

Density-functional theory (DFT) is one of the most widely used quantum mechanical approaches for calculating the structure and properties of matter on an atomic scale. It is nowadays routinely applied for calculating physical and chemical properties of molecules that are too large to be treatable by wave-function-based methods. The problem of determining the many-body wave function of a real system rapidly becomes prohibitively complex. Methods such as configuration interaction (Cl) expansions, coupled cluster (CC) techniques or Moller Plesset (MP) perturbation theory thus become harder and harder to apply. Computational complexity here is related to questions such as how many atoms there are in the molecule, how many electrons each atom contributes, how many basis functions are... [Pg.341]

Analogously to MP methods, coupled cluster theory may also be based on a UFIF reference wave function. The resulting UCC methods again suffer from spin contamination of the underlying UHF, but the infinite nature of coupled cluster methods is substantially better at reducing spin contamination relative to UMP. Projection methods analogous to those of the PUMP case have been considered but are not commonly used. ROHF based coupled cluster methods have also been proposed, but appear to give results very similar to UCC, especially at the CCSD(T) level. [Pg.139]

Figures 11.9 and 11.10 compare the performance of the CCSD and CCSD(T) methods, based on either an RFIF or UHF reference wave function. Compared to the RMP plot (Figure 11.7), it is seen that the infinite nature of coupled cluster causes it to perform somewhat better as the reference wave function becomes increasingly poor. While the RMP4 energy curve follows the exact out to an elongation of 1.0A, the CCSD(T) has the same accuracy out to - 1.5 A. Eventually, however, the wrong dissociation limit of the RHF wave also makes the coupled cluster methods break down, and the energy starts to decrease. Figures 11.9 and 11.10 compare the performance of the CCSD and CCSD(T) methods, based on either an RFIF or UHF reference wave function. Compared to the RMP plot (Figure 11.7), it is seen that the infinite nature of coupled cluster causes it to perform somewhat better as the reference wave function becomes increasingly poor. While the RMP4 energy curve follows the exact out to an elongation of 1.0A, the CCSD(T) has the same accuracy out to - 1.5 A. Eventually, however, the wrong dissociation limit of the RHF wave also makes the coupled cluster methods break down, and the energy starts to decrease.
DFT is the modern alternative to the wave-function based ab initio methods and allows to obtain accurate results at low computational cost, that also helps to understand the chemical origin of the effect. DFT, like Hartree-Fock (HF) methods, exploit molecular symmetry which is crucial in the case of computational studies of the JT effect. It also includes correlation effects into the Hamiltonian via the exchange-correlation functional. HF and many-body perturbation methods are found to perform poorly in the analysis of JT systems for obvious reasons, at contrast to the methods based on DFT, or multiconfigurational SCF and coupled cluster based methods [73]. The later are very accurate but have some drawbacks, mainly the very high computational cost that limits the applications to the smaller systems only. Another drawback is the choice of the active space which involves arbitrariness. [Pg.140]

The use of Cl methods has been declining in recent years, to the profit of MP and especially CC methods. It is now recognized that size extensivity is important for obtaining accurate results. Excited states, however, are somewhat difficult to treat by perturbation or coupled cluster methods, and Cl or MCSCF based methods have been the prefen ed methods here. More recently propagator or equation of motion (Section 10.9) methods have been developed for coupled cluster wave functions, which allows calculation of exited state properties. [Pg.146]

The second general approach to correlation theory, also based on perturbation theory, is the coupled-cluster method, which can be thought of as an infinite-order perturbation method. The coupled-cluster wave function T cc is expressed as a power series,... [Pg.218]


See other pages where Wave-function based methods coupled cluster is mentioned: [Pg.138]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.158]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.38 ]




SEARCH



Base function

Cluster coupled

Cluster function

Cluster method

Couple cluster methods

Coupled Cluster methods

Coupled cluster wave function

Coupled method coupling

Couplings functions

Function-Based Methods

Function-based

Functionalization methods

Method clustering

Wave-function based methods

© 2024 chempedia.info