Volume of Fluid approach

The model has demonstrated its versatility, allowing a detailed description of the various phenomena involved, but failed in predicting nearly segregated configurations for which numerical difficulties occurred. As the gas fraction approaches 1, the electrolyte conductivity tends towards 0. Moreover, from a fluid mechanics standpoint, the validity of the Euler-Euler model is questionable and a Volume of Fluid approach should be preferred. 

FIGURE 4.1 Modeling approaches for multiphase flows, (a) Volume of fluid approach, (b) Eulerian-Lagrangian approach, (c) Eulerian-Eulerian approach. 

The drying problem is solved in small time steps by removing some liquid at the local evaporation rates and subsequently relaxing the liquid with a volume-of-fluid approach as proposed by Stepanek et al. (1999). Space is discretized into voxels, and the distribution of solid, liquid and gas is described by the respective volume fractions in these voxels (, Jw and ). From these phase functions, normal vectors can be computed, for example... 

Reservoir engineers describe the relationship between the volume of fluids produced, the compressibility of the fluids and the reservoir pressure using material balance techniques. This approach treats the reservoir system like a tank, filled with oil, water, gas, and reservoir rock in the appropriate volumes, but without regard to the distribution of the fluids (i.e. the detailed movement of fluids inside the system). Material balance uses the PVT properties of the fluids described in Section 5.2.6, and accounts for the variations of fluid properties with pressure. The technique is firstly useful in predicting how reservoir pressure will respond to production. Secondly, material balance can be used to reduce uncertainty in volumetries by measuring reservoir pressure and cumulative production during the producing phase of the field life. An example of the simplest material balance equation for an oil reservoir above the bubble point will be shown In the next section. 

The general class of free boundary flow problems can, however, be modelled using the volume of fluid (VOF) approach (Nichols et ai, 1980). The main concept in this technique is to solve, simultaneously with the governing flow equations, an additional equation that represents the unknown boundary. Three different versions of this method are described in the following sections. 

The PDF of an inert scalar is unchanged by the first two steps, but approaches the well mixed condition during step (3).108 The overall rate of mixing will be determined by the slowest step in the process. In general, this will be step (1). Note also that, except in the linear-eddy model (Kerstein 1988), interactions between Lagrangian fluid particles are not accounted for in step (1). This limits the applicability of most mechanistic models to cases where a small volume of fluid is mixed into a much larger volume (i.e., where interactions between fluid particles will be minimal). 

If not in an ER product, a drug is likely to exhibit dissolution-limited absorption if it is poorly soluble in the GI lumen. Usually, identification of a compound with dissolution-limited GI absorption is based on D S ratio (4) when D S is about < 250 mL over the pH range of 1-7.5, the compound is usually considered to have less than ideal lumenal dissolution characteristics (3,5), with 250 mL being a conservative estimate of the total volume of fluids that will be in contact with the dose in the upper GI tract under fasting conditions. However, this approach has several weaknesses ... 

In fixed-grid methods, there is a predefined grid that does not move with the interface. The interface has to somehow cut across this structured or unstructured fixed grid. The popular Volume of Fluid (VOF), Level Set (Sethian, 1996) or cellular automata methods are examples of a fixed-grid approach. 

The volume of fluid (VOF) approach simulates the motion of all the phases rather than tracking the motion of the interface itself. The motion of the interface is inferred indirectly through the motion of different phases separated by an interface. Motion of the different phases is tracked by solving an advection equation of a marker function or of a phase volume fraction. Thus, when a control volume is not entirely occupied by one phase, mixture properties are used while solving governing Eqs (4.1) and (4.2). This avoids abrupt changes in properties across a very thin interface. The properties appearing in Eqs (4.1) and (4.2) are related to the volume fraction of the th phase as follows ... 

Rigby et al. (1997) also applied a CFD-based model to understand bubble break-up from ventilated cavities in gas-liquid reactors. Ranade etal. (2001d) used a volume of fluid (VOF) approach to understand cavity formation behind blades. Observations and insight gained through such studies may be used to develop appropriate sub-models, which can then be incorporated in a detailed reactor-engineering model. 

In general, it may be concluded that it is possible to develop appropriate Eulerian-Eulerian models to simulate complex gas-liquid (solid) flows, with some support from the experimental data. Some of the possible applications of such models are discussed in the next section. Before discussing these applications, recent simulations carried out with Eulerian-Lagrangian and volume of fluid (VOF) approaches are briefly reviewed here. 

We have shown how a pointwise DE can be derived by application of the macroscopic principle of mass conservation to a material (control) volume of fluid. In this section, we consider the derivation of differential equations of motion by application of Newton s second law of motion, and its generalization from linear to angular momentum, to the same material control volume. It may be noted that introductory chemical engineering courses in transport phenomena often approach the derivation of these same equations of motion as an application of the conservation of linear and angular momentum applied to a fixed control volume. In my view, this obscures the fact that the equations of motion in fluid mechanics are nothing more than the familiar laws of Newtonian mechanics that are generally introduced in freshman physics. 

---