Vertical velocity shear

Fig. 8. Vertical velocity profile near impeller blade tip where the shear rate = AV/AV.

Once the mathematical description of dispersion has been clarified, we are left with the task of quantifying the dispersion coefficient, Eiis. Obviously, Edh depends on the characteristics of the flow field, particularly on the velocity shear, dvx/dy and dvx /dz. As it turns out, the shear is directly related to the mean flow velocity vx. In addition, the probability that the water parcels change between different streamlines must also influence dispersion. This probability must be related to the turbulent diffusivity perpendicular to the flow, that is, to vertical and lateral diffusion. At this point it is essential to know whether the lateral and vertical extension of the system is finite or whether the flow is virtually unlimited. For the former (a situation typical for river flow), the dispersion coefficient is proportional to (vx )2 ... 

In the vertical distribution of the modules of mean current vectors (Fig. 3a), the highest vertical gradient (shear) is observed between 10 and 25 m (total mean values of 0.215 and 0.165 m s-1, respectively). This is probably related to the effect of the wind drift. In the layer 25-50 m, mean velocities are homogeneous and the main shear in their values takes place deeper down... 

In addition to the results presented above, we should also note the studies of the climatic BSGC [56] based on the basic Russian prognostic model [57]. The distinctive features of [56] were related to the dependence of the coefficients of horizontal turbulence on lateral velocity shears and to the specifying of the monthly climatic temperature and salinity field at the surface [29] instead of the heat and moisture fluxes. Despite the relatively coarse horizontal calculation grid (about 22 km), this allowed the authors to reproduce [56] a relatively distinct MRC jet and the known NSAEs off the Turkish and Caucasian coasts and off the Danube River mouth. The results of the tuning in [56] of the Munk-Anderson s formula for the coefficient of the vertical turbulent exchange from the point of view of reproduction of the actual CIL were used in [53,54]. 

The distributed array of drag elements in vegetation canopies creates a mean wind profile that contains an elevated shear layer centred near the canopy top that more closely approximates a plane mixing layer than a wall layer. This velocity stmcture is responsible for turbulence characteristics that differ substantially from those over a smooth surface. Velocity spectra are sharply peaked, streamwise and vertical velocities have probability densities that are strongly skewed, streamwise and vertical velocities are correlated more strongly that would be expected over a smoother surface, and transport is dominated by coherent flow structures with sweeps more important than ejections. 

This is the basic equation of fluid statics, also called the barometric equation. It is correct only if there are no shear stresses on the vertical faces of the cube in Fig. 2.1. If there are such shear stresses, then they may have a component in the vertical direction, which must be added to the sum of forces in Eq. 2.1. For simple newtonian fluids, shear stresses in the vertical direction can exist only if the fluid has a different vertical velocity on one side of the cube from that on the other side (see Eq. 1.5). Thus this equation is correct if the fluid is not moving at all, which is the case in fluid statics, or if it is moving but only in the X and y directions, or if it has a uniform velocity in the z direction. In this chapter, we apply it only when a fluid has no motion relative to its container or to some set of fixed coordinates. In later chapters, we apply it to flows in which there is no motion in the z direction or a motion with a uniform z component. 

Within the rrrixed layer, the Earth s rotation influences the vertical wind shear and therefore the intensity of turbulence. Thus, tmder neutral conditions, the depth of the rrrixed layer shotrld be proportional to the surface friction velocity m and the Coriolis parameter /,... 

In Figure (5), it becomes obvious that the minima of the viscosity are directly related to the zero values of the horizontal velocity and not to the vertical velocity of the bulk solid in vertical direction, although it is 20 times higher than the horizontal velocity. This results demonstrate that the viscosity depends mainly on the shear deformations D. ... 

In the Couette flow inside a cone-and-plate viscometer the circumferential velocity at any given radial position is approximately a linear function of the vertical coordinate. Therefore the shear rate corresponding to this component is almost constant. The heat generation term in Equation (5.25) is hence nearly constant. Furthermore, in uniform Couette regime the convection term is also zero and all of the heat transfer is due to conduction. For very large conductivity coefficients the heat conduction will be very fast and the temperature profile will... 

In the Irvine-Park falling needle viscometer (FNV) (194), the moving body is a needle. A small-diameter glass or stainless steel needle falls vertically in a fluid. The viscous properties and density of the fluid are derived from the velocity of the needle. The technique is simple and useflil for measuring low (down to lO " ) shear viscosities. The FNV-100 is a manual instmment designed for the measurement of transparent Newtonian and non-Newtonian... 

Two liquids of equal densities, the one Newtonian and the other a non-Newtonian power law fluid, flow at equal volumetric rates down two wide vertical surfaces of the same widths. The non-Newtonian fluid has a power law index of 0.5 and has the same apparent viscosity as the Newtonian fluid when its shear rate is 0,01 s-1. Show that, for equal surface velocities of the two fluids, the film thickness for the non-Newtonian fluid is 1.125 times that of the Newtonian fluid. 

---