Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Van der Waals interaction distance

The biasing function is applied to spread the range of configurations sampled such that the trajectory contains configurations appropriate to both the initial and final states. For the creation or deletion of atoms a softcore interaction function may be used. The standard Lennard-Jones (LJ) function used to model van der Waals interactions between atoms is strongly repulsive at short distances and contains a singularity at r = 0. This precludes two atoms from occupying the same position. A so-called softcore potential in contrast approaches a finite value at short distances. This removes the sin-... [Pg.154]

Additionally to and a third adjustable parameter a was introduced. For a-values between 14 and 15, a form very similar to the Lennard-Jones [12-6] potential can be obtained. The Buckingham type of potential has the disadvantage that it becomes attractive for very short interatomic distances. A Morse potential may also be used to model van der Waals interactions in a PEF, assuming that an adapted parameter set is available. [Pg.347]

Independent molecules and atoms interact through non-bonded forces, which also play an important role in determining the structure of individual molecular species. The non-bonded interactions do not depend upon a specific bonding relationship between atoms, they are through-space interactions and are usually modelled as a function of some inverse power of the distance. The non-bonded terms in a force field are usually considered in two groups, one comprising electrostatic interactions and the other van der Waals interactions. [Pg.199]

A molecular dynamics force field is a convenient compilation of these data (see Chapter 2). The data may be used in a much simplified fonn (e.g., in the case of metric matrix distance geometry, all data are converted into lower and upper bounds on interatomic distances, which all have the same weight). Similar to the use of energy parameters in X-ray crystallography, the parameters need not reflect the dynamic behavior of the molecule. The force constants are chosen to avoid distortions of the molecule when experimental restraints are applied. Thus, the force constants on bond angle and planarity are a factor of 10-100 higher than in standard molecular dynamics force fields. Likewise, a detailed description of electrostatic and van der Waals interactions is not necessary and may not even be beneficial in calculating NMR strucmres. [Pg.257]

Figure 5 Schematic representation of a Cartesian dynamics protocol starting from random torsion angles. The weights for non bonded (i.e., van der Waals) interactions, unambiguous distance restraints, and ambiguous distance restraints are varied independently. The covalent interactions are maintained with full weight, co.aie - for the entire protocol. Weights for other experimental terms may be varied in an analogous way. Coupling constant restraints and anisotropy restraints are usually used only in a refinement stage. Figure 5 Schematic representation of a Cartesian dynamics protocol starting from random torsion angles. The weights for non bonded (i.e., van der Waals) interactions, unambiguous distance restraints, and ambiguous distance restraints are varied independently. The covalent interactions are maintained with full weight, co.aie - for the entire protocol. Weights for other experimental terms may be varied in an analogous way. Coupling constant restraints and anisotropy restraints are usually used only in a refinement stage.
In the second type of interaction contributing to van der Waals forces, a molecule with a permanent dipole moment polarizes a neighboring non-polar molecule. The two molecules then align with each other. To calculate the van der Waals interaction between the two molecules, let us first assume that the first molecule has a permanent dipole with a moment u and is separated from a polarizable molecule (dielectric constant ) by a distance r and oriented at some angle 0 to the axis of separation. The dipole is also oriented at some angle from the axis defining the separation between the two molecules. Overall, the picture would be very similar to Fig. 6 used for dipole-dipole interaction except that the interaction is induced as opposed to permanent. [Pg.171]

It is interesting to note that all three mechanisms contributing to the attractive van der Waals interactions vary as the reciprocal of the separation distance to the sixth power. It is for this reason that the Lennard-Jones potential has been extensively used to model van der Waals forces. [Pg.173]

Van der Waals interactions 0.4-4.0 0.2 Strength depends on the relative size of the atoms or molecules and the distance between them. The size factor determines the area of contact between two molecules The greater the area, the stronger the interaction. [Pg.15]

FIGURE 1.13 The van der Waals interaction energy profile as a fnnction of the distance, r, between the centers of two atoms. The energy was calcnlated nsing the empirical equation U= B/r — A/r. (Values for the parameters B = 11.5 X 10 kJnm /mol and A = 5.96 X 10 kJnmVtiiol for the interaction between two carbon atoms are from Levitt, M., Journal of Molecular Biology... [Pg.16]

The van der Waals distance, Rq, and softness parameters, depend on both atom types. These parameters are in all force fields written in terms of parameters for the individual atom types. There are several ways of combining atomic parameters to diatomic parameters, some of them being quite complicated. A commonly used method is to take the van der Waals minimum distance as the sum of two van der Waals radii, and the interaction parameter as the geometrical mean of atomic softness constants. [Pg.22]

The van der Waals interaction energy of two hydrogen atoms at large intemuclear distances is discussed by the use of a linear variation function. By including in the variation function, in addition to the unperturbed wave function, 26 terms for the dipole-dipole interaction, 17 for the dipole-quadrupole interaction, and 26 for the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction, the... [Pg.739]

The surface force apparatus (SFA) is a device that detects the variations of normal and tangential forces resulting from the molecule interactions, as a function of normal distance between two curved surfaces in relative motion. SFA has been successfully used over the past years for investigating various surface phenomena, such as adhesion, rheology of confined liquid and polymers, colloid stability, and boundary friction. The first SFA was invented in 1969 by Tabor and Winterton [23] and was further developed in 1972 by Israela-chivili and Tabor [24]. The device was employed for direct measurement of the van der Waals forces in the air or vacuum between molecularly smooth mica surfaces in the distance range of 1.5-130 nm. The results confirmed the prediction of the Lifshitz theory on van der Waals interactions down to the separations as small as 1.5 nm. [Pg.14]

In a real liqnid, the nature of the disjoining pressure can be a complicated function of the distance, due to the simultaneous coutributiou of several types of forces [1,4-6], For two bodies with flat surfaces separated by a distance z, the van der Waals interaction, which varies as z (or z, if one considers retardation) for single atoms and molecules, gives rise to a power law of the form ... [Pg.244]

The first term is related to the van der Waals interaction, with A being the Hamaker constant. The second term includes other forces that decay exponentially with distance. As discussed, these may include double-layer, solvation, and hydration forces. In our data analysis, B and C were used as fitting variables the Hamaker constant A was calculated using Lifshitz theory [6]. [Pg.254]


See other pages where Van der Waals interaction distance is mentioned: [Pg.31]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.4015]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.4015]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.2675]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.334]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.10 , Pg.121 ]




SEARCH



Interaction distance

Interaction van der Waals

Van der Waal interactions

Van der Waals distance

Waals interactions

© 2024 chempedia.info