Discriminant validity

The validity discriminant discussed in this section is the descendant of an earlier cluster validity measure used by Gunderson ( ) to assess the quality of cluster configurations obtained in an application of the Fuzzy ISODATA algorithms. It is closely related to a method suggested by Sneath ( ) for testing the distinctness, i.e. separation, of two clusters, and also borrows from the ideas of Fisher s linear discriminant theory (see chapt. 4, Duda and Hart,(2 0). The validity discriminant attempts to measure the separation between the classes of a cluster configuration usually, but not necessarily, obtained by application of the FCV algorithms. A brief description follows ... 

The validity discriminant is then defined by the extremum problem... 

The largest eigenvalue so obtained Is the maximal value of the ratio, and thus provides the value of the validity discriminant. ... 

Table II summarizes the estimates obtained In the NILU study when using the methodology outlined above. Results for the Haga site have been boxed In for later comparison with results obtained using the cluster validity discriminant. The lower values for the 24h samples probably reflects their being collected when there was little land- or sea-breeze for transport of the emissions from the smelter. Daytime sea breezes would tend to transport emissions toward and past the Haga site, while the evening landbreezes would tend to transport emissions back toward the Haga site.

Use of the subjective procedure may not be wholly Inappropriate for Investigations such as this one, where the total number of measurement vectors Is relatively small. Typically, the procedure required comparison of the membership of 25-35 vectors In 2-4 classes for the NILU data. For studies where the data consists of many more measurement vectors, and may require Investigating the existence of a number of classes In the data, such an approach may become Impractical and the accuracy of the results questionable. This should not be the case for the validity discriminant, where the Increase In measurement vectors and data classes results only In an Increase In computation time. 

The basic agreement achieved using the two different approaches was considered an Important result in that It tended to validate the validity discriminant concept, and provided increased confidence In its use on larger data sets for other investigations. 

Even quantitative assessment of pregnanetriol by visual comparison with standards would be adequate using carefully coded samples, and preferably duplicates. It is agreed from objective evaluations in a wide variety of fields that this method has a C.V. of 15 to 20% (B27). In the presence of 5- to 100-fold elevations of this steroid in the adrenogenital syndrome, the visual method would meet the usual requirements for a clinically valid discriminant (W3). 

Guidance on specifications is divided into universal tests/criteria which are considered generally applicable to all new substances/products and specific tests/criteria which may need to be addressed on a case-by-case basis when they have an impact on the quality for batch control. Tests are expected to follow the ICH guideline on analytical validation (Section 13.5.4). Identification of the drug substance is included in the universal category, and such a test must be able discriminate between compounds of closely related structure which are likely to be present. It is acknowledged here that optically active substances may need specific identification testing or performance of a chiral assay in addition to this requirement. 

As can be seen from the above, the shape of the resolved rotational structure is well described when the parameters of the fitting law were chosen from the best fit to experiment. The values of estimated from the rotational width of the collapsed Q-branch qZE. Therefore the models giving the same high-density limits. One may hope to discriminate between them only in the intermediate range of densities where the spectrum is unresolved but has not yet collapsed. The spectral shape in this range may be calculated only numerically from Eq. (4.86) with impact operator Tj, linear in n. Of course, it implies that binary theory is still valid and that vibrational dephasing is not yet... 

E. Marengo and R. Todeschini, Linear discriminant hierarchical clustering a modeling and cross-validable divisive clustering method. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 19 (1993) 43-51. 

Most of the supervised pattern recognition procedures permit the carrying out of stepwise selection, i.e. the selection first of the most important feature, then, of the second most important, etc. One way to do this is by prediction using e.g. cross-validation (see next section), i.e. we first select the variable that best classifies objects of known classification but that are not part of the training set, then the variable that most improves the classification already obtained with the first selected variable, etc. The results for the linear discriminant analysis of the EU/HYPER classification of Section 33.2.1 is that with all 5 or 4 variables a selectivity of 91.4% is obtained and for 3 or 2 variables 88.6% [2] as a measure of classification success. Selectivity is used here. It is applied in the sense of Chapter... 

Hogan, T. P., Awad, A. G. Eastwood, R. (1983). A self-report scale predictive of drug compliance in schizophrenics reliability and discriminative validity. Psychol. Med., 13, 177-83. 

If we know that behind the beam stop the intensity is always 50 counts or less, we can discriminate the valid area of our image by defining a ROI mask (i.e., a shape function) (cf. p. 17) by simply writing... 

The VolSurf method was used to produce molecular descriptors, and PLS discriminant analysis (DA) was applied. The statistical model showed two significant latent variables after cross-validation. The 2D PLS score model offers a discrimination between the permeable and less permeable compounds. When the spectrum color is active (Fig. 17.2), red points refer to high permeability, whereas blue points indicate low permeability. There is a region in the central part of the plot with both red and blue compounds. In this region, and in between the two continuous lines, the permeability prediction is less reliable. The permeability model... 

Delete indicators that do not discriminate sufficiently between latent groups that is, are not valid. 

---