Valence space group determination

The correctness of a structure determination and its interpretation is supported by the Valence Sum Rule holding around all atoms. A significant discrepancy between an atomic valence and the sum of the experimental bond valences usually means that the model proposed for the structure is faulty. Problems could arise from overlooking a bond or an atom or from the use of an incorrect space group. 

If the selected space group of the starting structure has high symmetry, the number of free parameters will be smaller than the number of constraints and it is not possible for all the predicted distances to be realized. If the deviations are small, the structure may be stable, but if they are large, the structure will relax or, in extreme cases, be so unstable that it cannot be prepared. Relaxation may involve only a small adjustment to the bond lengths so that the valence sum rule continues to be obeyed (at the expense of the equal valence rule), or it may involve a reduction in the symmetry as is found in the case of CaCrF5 described above. If the symmetry is reduced, the number of free variables is increased and the atomic coordinates may be under-determined. In this case, the constraints on the sizes of non-bonding distances become important. 

The reference space (reference determinants) define the partition of the spin-orbital space into three groups (Fig. 3.1). These groups are the core, active (or valence), and virtual (excited) spin-orbital subspaces. The core spin-orbitals are those which are occupied in all determinants in the reference (model) space the virtual (excited) spin-orbitals are not occupied in any reference determinant (these are empty spin-orbitals), and the active (valence) spin-orbitals are those which are occupied in at least one reference determinant and unoccupied in at least one other determinant. All possible different distributions of the valence (active) electrons among the active (valence) spin-orbitals generate all determinants of the complete model (reference) space. 

Perovskite structure is realized when 0.8 tolerance factor is closer to 1 (0.9 < f < 1.05). However, it is important to realize that ionic approximation is not always valid and several other factors (e.g., Jahn-Teller effect, metal-metal interactions) may strongly affect crystal structure [4]. In other words, it is not possible to predict space group, in which considered material will crystallize only on the basis of calculated value of t. Additionally, there are other ways for calculating tolerance factor one is based on Bond Valence method [14], while the other one uses real interatomic distances determined, for instance, from neutron diffraction studies. Values of t derived from the last method represent in fact the actual degree of distortion of the cell and are usually much closer to 1, comparing to values obtained from Shannon s ionic radii. 

The fact that the co-ordination number for so many elements is six, and is generally independent of the nature of the co-ordinated groups, has made A. Werner suggest that the number is decided by available space rather than affinity, and that six is usually the maximum number which can be fitted about the central atom to form a stable system. Consequently, the co-ordination number represents a property of the atom which enables the constitution of molecular compounds to be referred back to actual linkings between definite atoms. A molecular compound is primarily formed through the agency of secondary valencies and, just as primary valencies determine the number of univalent atoms or their equivalent which can be linked to a central atom, so secondary valencies determine the number of mols. which can be attached to the central atom. The secondary valency is often active only towards definite mol. complexes, and hence the formation of additive compounds with other mol. complexes does not occur. Accordingly, the number of secondary valencies which are active towards different molecules is not always the same. 

It is easy to illustrate the three-dimensional consequences of the VSEPR model with examples from our macroscopic world. We need only to blow up a few balloons that children play with. If groups of two, three, four, five, and six balloons, respectively, are connected at the ends near their openings, the resulting arrangements are shown in Figure 3-36. Obviously, the space requirements of the various groups of balloons acting as mutual repulsions, determine the shapes and symmetries of these assemblies. The balloons here play the role of the electron pairs of the valence shell. 

Because catalysis is concerned primarily with the surfaces of solids, some attention should be given to any specialized defects associated with the surface of a solid, and to the possible interaction between the surface and defects in the bulk. We note first that the surface itself is a defect, since the interface between a regular lattice of interacting particles and a vacuum must be the seat of either unusual atom spacings or stresses, and of either free valences or special terminating groups. This itself determines or affects some properties of catalytic importance, and likewise has a bearing on the nature of surface defects and of their formation by radiation. 

---