Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Valence shell electron pair repulsion separation

The tetrahedral geometry of methane is often explained with the valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) model The VSEPR model rests on the idea that an electron pair either a bonded pair or an unshared pair associated with a particular atom will be as far away from the atom s other electron pairs as possible Thus a tetrahedral geomehy permits the four bonds of methane to be maximally separated and is charac terized by H—C—H angles of 109 5° a value referred to as the tetrahedral angle... [Pg.29]

Section 1 10 The shapes of molecules can often be predicted on the basis of valence shell electron pair repulsions A tetrahedral arrangement gives the max imum separation of four electron pairs (left) a trigonal planar arrange ment is best for three electron pairs (center) and a linear arrangement for two electron pairs (right)... [Pg.49]

The most widely used qualitative model for the explanation of the shapes of molecules is the Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) model of Gillespie and Nyholm (25). The orbital correlation diagrams of Walsh (26) are also used for simple systems for which the qualitative form of the MOs may be deduced from symmetry considerations. Attempts have been made to prove that these two approaches are equivalent (27). But this is impossible since Walsh s Rules refer explicitly to (and only have meaning within) the MO model while the VSEPR method does not refer to (is not confined by) any explicitly-stated model of molecular electronic structure. Thus, any proof that the two approaches are equivalent can only prove, at best, that the two are equivalent at the MO level i.e. that Walsh s Rules are contained in the VSEPR model. Of course, the transformation to localised orbitals of an MO determinant provides a convenient picture of VSEPR rules but the VSEPR method itself depends not on the independent-particle model but on the possibility of separating the total electronic structure of a molecule into more or less autonomous electron pairs which interact as separate entities (28). The localised MO description is merely the simplest such separation the general case is our Eq. (6)... [Pg.78]

We have already assumed that electron pairs, whether in bonds or as nonbonding pairs, repel other electron pairs. This is manifested in the tetrahedral and trigonal geometry of tetravalent and trivalent carbon compounds. These geometries correspond to maximum separation of the electron-pair bonds. Part of this repulsion is electrostatic, but there is another important factor. The Pauli exclusion principle states that only two electrons can occupy the same point in space and that they must have opposite spin quantum numbers. Equivalent orbitals therefore maintain maximum separation, as found in the sp, sjf, and sp hybridization for tetra-, tri-, and divalent compounds of the second-row elements. The combination of Pauli exclusion and electrostatic repulsion leads to the valence shell electron-pair repulsion rule (VSEPR), which states that bonds and unshared electron pairs assume the orientation that permits maximum separation. [Pg.7]

VSEPR model (valence shell electron pair repulsion) (Section 1.16) A method of predicting the geometry at a covalently bonded atom by considering the optimum geometric separation between groups of bonding and non-bonding electrons around the atom... [Pg.1169]

Finally, in addition to simply representing a pair of shared electrons, a chemical bond has structural implications as well. Because electrons are negatively charged, when there are several distinct bonds, they will tend to be physically separated from each other. This idea is the basis for a method to predict the geometry of molecules called the Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory. Using this theory, the general shape of molecules and ions can be predicted. [Pg.290]

The shapes of many molecules and polyatomic ions can be predicted by using the valence-shell electron-pair repulsion theory (VSEPR). According to the VSEPR theory, electron pairs in the valence shell of the central atom of a molecule or ion repel one another and become arranged so as to maximize their separation distances. The resulting arrangement determines the molecular or ionic shape when one or all of the electron pairs involved form bonds between the central atom and other atoms. [Pg.170]

Valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) theory Assumes that valenee eleetron pairs are arranged around the eentral element of a moleeule or polyatomic ion so that there is maximum separation (and minimum repulsion) among eleetron groups. [Pg.322]

We can predict the geometry of simple molecules using valence-shell electron-pair repulsion (VSEPR) theory. This theory is based on the idea that bonded and nonbonded electron pairs around a central atom repel one another. Hence, they are arranged in a geometry that provides maximum separation in space, and therefore rninimum electron repulsion. For bonds to carbon, the following rules apply ... [Pg.15]

In the case of two valence electrons there is hardly any difference between the localized orbital and the canonical valence orbital, except for the fact that the localization has separated the valence shell somewhat from the other shells. — In the case of four valence electrons, the sigma bonding and the sigma antibonding canonical orbitals yield two equivalent localized orbitals which resemble distorted atomic (2s) orbitals on each of the two atoms. They are precursors of what will be seen to be sigma lone pairs and are denoted by oC and ok . The absence of a bond can be ascribed to the nonbonded repulsion between these orbitals. This corresponds to the case of the unstable Be2 molecule. —... [Pg.49]

Consider the gaseous beryllium chloride molecule, BeCl2(g) The Lewis structure of the molecule shows there are only two electron pairs (two electron domains) in the valence shell of the beryllium atom (Figure 4-44). These two pairs of electrons try to separate as far as possible from each other so as to minimize electron repulsion. Thus, the beryllium chloride molecule adopts a linear shape with a bond angle of 180°, because the electron pairs are ferthest apart when they are on opposite sides of the beryllium atom. [Pg.137]

The ELF approach uses a local function related to the Pauh repulsion to probe the separation of the different electron pairs and from this analysis carries out a partition of the molecular space into basins that correspond to the volumes occupied by core inner shells, bonds, and lone pairs. As in the Lewis model, a valence basin may either belong to a single atomic shell or be shared by several ones. In the first case, the basin is called monosynaptic and corresponds to a lone-pair region, and in the second case, it is polysynaptic and specifically disynaptic for a two-center bond that is of interest in this chapter. [Pg.180]


See other pages where Valence shell electron pair repulsion separation is mentioned: [Pg.5]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.828]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.828]   


SEARCH



Electron pair repulsion

Electronic repulsion

Electronics pair repulsion

Electronics separations

Electronics shells

Electrons valence-shell electron-pair

Electrons valence-shell electron-pair repulsion

Paired valence

Separated pair

Shell separation

Shell separator

Shell, electron valence

Valence Shell Electron Pair

Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion

Valence electron

Valence electrons Valency

Valence electrons repulsion

© 2024 chempedia.info