Unknown system behavior

The data collected are subjected to Fourier transformation yielding a peak at the frequency of each sine wave component in the EXAFS. The sine wave frequencies are proportional to the absorber-scatterer (a-s) distance /7IS. Each peak in the display represents a particular shell of atoms. To answer the question of how many of what kind of atom, one must do curve fitting. This requires a reliance on chemical intuition, experience, and adherence to reasonable chemical bond distances expected for the molecule under study. In practice, two methods are used to determine what the back-scattered EXAFS data for a given system should look like. The first, an empirical method, compares the unknown system to known models the second, a theoretical method, calculates the expected behavior of the a-s pair. The empirical method depends on having information on a suitable model, whereas the theoretical method is dependent on having good wave function descriptions of both absorber and scatterer. 

Lecat (32) is responsible for most of the azeotropic data on binary and ternary systems. Recently, however, Horsley (25) has compiled extensive tables of azeotropic data, thus making the information more available. These experimental data may be supplemented by estimations of the azeotropic composition and behavior of unknown systems by several reasonably reliable methods. Graphical methods, based on curves developed from experimental data, have been proposed by Lecat (82), Mair et al. (.ffi), Horsley (26), Skol-... 

The objective of model updating (often also referred to as parameter estimation) is to calibrate unknown system properties which appear as parameters in numerical models, based on actually observed behavior of the system of interest. In Bayesian model updating, this is performed in a probabilistic uncertainty quantification framework PDFs representing the uncertainty on the model parameters are updated through the experimental data this procedure is described briefly below. 

The deterministic system behavior is described by the four system matrices A, B, G, and J. The process noise vectorW i S and measurement noise vector V[,t] account for unknown excitation sources and modeling errors. In addition, the measurement noise vector V[,t] accounts for measurement errors. As an alternative to models based on first principles, models can be directly identified from experimental vibration data using system identification techniques see, e.g.. Van Overschee and De Moor (1993) and Reynders and De Roeck (2008). 

The 5(4I )-oxazolones are the familiar azlactones, and it is with this type that most studies have been conducted. The 5(2If)-oxazoIones are frequently referred to as pseudooxazolones, and there has been an increasing interest in the behavior of these compounds. A number of studies of the 2(3If)-system have been reported recently, and the existence of the 4(5lf )-system, previously in doubt, now seems firmly established. The 2(5lf)-oxazolones, however, remain unknown,... 

It is evident from the foregoing sections that simple alkylvinyl halides do not react via an Sn 1 mechanism, if at all, even under extreme solvolytic conditions (146,149). More reactive leaving groups, such as arylsulfonates, were clearly needed to investigate the possible solvolytic behavior of simple alkylvinyl systems, but the preparation of vinyl sulfonates until recently was unknown. Peterson and Indelicato (154) were the first to report the preparation of vinyl arylsulfonates via reaction of the appropriate disulfonate with potassium t-butoxide in refluxing f-butanol. They prepared and investigated the solvolysis of 1-cyclohexenyl tosylate 169 and c/s-2-buten-2-yl tosylate 170 and the corresponding p-bromobenzenesulfonates (brosylates). Reaction... 

The nature of the mathematical model that describes a physical system may dictate a range of acceptable values for the unknown parameters. Furthermore, repeated computations of the response variables for various values of the parameters and subsequent plotting of the results provides valuable experience to the analyst about the behavior of the model and its dependency on the parameters. As a result of this exercise, we often come up with fairly good initial guesses for the parameters. The only disadvantage of this approach is that it could be time consuming. This counterbalanced by the fact that one learns a lot about the structure and behavior of the model at hand. 

Response We were not trying to use the chemometric techniques to create a physical model in the column. We also agree that physical models should be created in the traditional manner, based on the study of the physical considerations of a situation. Ideally you would start from a fundamental physical law and derive, through logic and mathematics, the behavior of a particular system this is how all other fields of science work. A chemometric technique then would be used only to ascertain the value (from a series of physical measurements) of an unknown parameter that the mathematical derivation created. 

---