Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy UPS

Spectra as in Fig. 3.17 can also be obtained as a function of polar and azimuthal angle, and with polarized UV light, enabling one to probe band structures in all directions [18]. In this chapter we limit ourselves to angle-integrated measurements of the electron density of states. [Pg.60]

Ek- hv - cp. Hence, the width, W, of a UPS spectrum equals hv- (p, and the work function becomes  [Pg.61]

However, UPS and XPS do not both image the density of states in entirely the same way. In XPS, the photoelectrons originating from the valence band leave the sample with kinetic energies over 1 keV. In UPS, the exciting energy is on the order of 21 eV, and the kinetic energy of the electrons is low, say between 5 and 16 eV. This means that the final state of the photoelectron is within the unoccupied part of the density of states of the metal. As a result, the UPS spectrum represents a convolution of the densities of occupied and unoccupied states, which is sometimes called the Joint Density of States.  [Pg.61]

In the formalism of quantum mechanics, the probability that an electron in the initial state is transferred into the final state, is given by Fermi s Golden Rule  [Pg.61]

If hv increases to higher values, (which is easily achieved in a synchrotron) [Pg.62]

In parallel with these developments for studying molecules, the same technique was being developed independently to study solids particularly metals and semi- [Pg.300]

As stated earlier, the major use of UPS is not for materials analysis purposes but for electronic structure studies. There are analysis capabilities, however. We will consider these in two parts those involving the electron valence energy levels and those involving low-lying core levels accessible to UPS photon energies (including synchrotron sources). Then we will answer the question why use UPS if XPS is available  [Pg.302]

Element Core level Approximate binding energy (eV) Usable r radiation [Pg.305]

Si 2p line, at about 100 eV BE, is also easily accessible at most synchrotron sources but cannot, of course, be observed using He I and He II radiation. On the other hand, the Zn 3d and Hg 4f lines can be observed quite readily by He I radiation (see Table 1) and the elements identified in this way. Quantitative analysis using relative peak intensities is performed exactly as in XPS, but the photoionization cross sections a are very different at UPS photon energies, compared to A1 Ka energies, and tabulated or calculated values are not so readily available. Quantitation, therefore, usually has to be done using local standards. [Pg.305]

Secondly, spectral resolution can be significantly higher for UPS or synchrotron data, compared to XPS. This is simply a consequence of UPS (synchrotron) sources [Pg.306]

Uptake curves provide information on the sticking coefficient of the molecule if the sticking probability is high, the surface fills up rapidly. The sticking coefficient is proportional to the slope of the uptake curve. Once the CO pressure above the surface is known precisely (which is not always trivial ), the rate of collision between gas and surface follows from the kinetic theory of gases [59]. The sticking coefficient is then the fraction of molecules that adsorb upon collision, and can be calculated from the slope of the uptake curve. [Pg.65]

Baraldi and co-workers [52] have described a wealth of dynamic XPS studies on surface reactions, including adsorption, dissociation, desorption, and even catalytic reactions, such as the epoxidation of alkenes [60], and the reduction of NO by H2 and CO [61]. [Pg.65]

UPS differs from XPS in that UV light is used instead of X-rays. The most frequently used sources are helium discharge lamps, which generate He I light at 21.2 eV and He II light at 40.8 eV. At these low exciting energies, photoemission [Pg.65]

Spicer, K.Y. Yu, I. Lindau, P. Pianetta, and D. M. Collins, in Surface and Defect Properties of Solids Specialist Periodical Reports, The Chemical Society, London, 1976, Vol. 5, p. 103. [Pg.48]


Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) is a variety of photoelectron spectroscopy that is aimed at measuring the valence band, as described in sectionBl.25.2.3. Valence band spectroscopy is best perfonned with photon energies in the range of 20-50 eV. A He discharge lamp, which can produce 21.2 or 40.8 eV photons, is commonly used as the excitation source m the laboratory, or UPS can be perfonned with synchrotron radiation. Note that UPS is sometimes just referred to as photoelectron spectroscopy (PES), or simply valence band photoemission. [Pg.308]

Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) results have provided detailed infomiation about CO adsorption on many surfaces. Figure A3.10.24 shows UPS results for CO adsorption on Pd(l 10) [58] that are representative of molecular CO adsorption on platinum surfaces. The difference result in (c) between the clean surface and the CO-covered surface shows a strong negative feature just below the Femii level ( p), and two positive features at 8 and 11 eV below E. The negative feature is due to suppression of emission from the metal d states as a result of an anti-resonance phenomenon. The positive features can be attributed to the 4a molecular orbital of CO and the overlap of tire 5a and 1 k molecular orbitals. The observation of features due to CO molecular orbitals clearly indicates that CO molecularly adsorbs. The overlap of the 5a and 1 ti levels is caused by a stabilization of the 5 a molecular orbital as a consequence of fomiing the surface-CO chemisorption bond. [Pg.951]

Figure Bl.19.4. (a) Local conductance STS measurements at specific points within the Si(l 11)-(7 x 7) unit cell (symbols) and averaged over whole cell, (b) Equivalent data obtained by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) and inverse photoemission spectroscopy (IPS). (Taken from [19], figure 2.)... Figure Bl.19.4. (a) Local conductance STS measurements at specific points within the Si(l 11)-(7 x 7) unit cell (symbols) and averaged over whole cell, (b) Equivalent data obtained by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) and inverse photoemission spectroscopy (IPS). (Taken from [19], figure 2.)...
Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) [2, 3 and 4, 6] differs from XPS in that UV light (He I, 21.2 eV He II, 40.8 eV) is used instead of x-rays. At these low excitmg energies, photoemission is limited to valence electrons. [Pg.1860]

Figure 8.1 Processes occurring in (a) ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS), (b) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and (c) Auger electron spectroscopy (AES)... Figure 8.1 Processes occurring in (a) ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS), (b) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and (c) Auger electron spectroscopy (AES)...
Other techniques in which incident photons excite the surface to produce detected electrons are also Hsted in Table 1. X-ray photoelectron Spectroscopy (xps), which is also known as electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (esca), is based on the use of x-rays which stimulate atomic core level electron ejection for elemental composition information. Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (ups) is similar but uses ultraviolet photons instead of x-rays to probe atomic valence level electrons. Photons are used to stimulate desorption of ions in photon stimulated ion angular distribution (psd). Inverse photoemission (ip) occurs when electrons incident on a surface result in photon emission which is then detected. [Pg.269]

Several UHV techniques which have been developed have not found such wide use in corrosion analysis, despite potential applicability. Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) is one of these, operating in a similar fashion to XPS (but using an ultraviolet excitation), and probing the valence electrons, rather than the core electrons of the atoms. Because the energies of the valence electrons are so very sensitive to the precise state of the atom, the technique is in principle very informative however exactly this high sensitivity renders the data difficult to interpret, particularly as a routine... [Pg.33]

Bifunctional spacer molecules of different sizes have been used to construct nanoparticle networks formed via self-assembly of arrays of metal colloid particles prepared via reductive stabilization [88,309,310]. A combination of physical methods such as TEM, XAS, ASAXS, metastable impact electron spectroscopy (MIES), and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) has revealed that the particles are interlinked through rigid spacer molecules with proton-active functional groups to bind at the active aluminium-carbon sites in the metal-organic protecting shells [88]. [Pg.34]

The low BE region of XPS spectra (<20 — 30 eV) represents delocalized electronic states involved in bonding interactions [7]. Although UV radiation interacts more strongly (greater cross-section because of the similarity of its energy with the ionization threshold) with these states to produce photoelectrons, the valence band spectra measured by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) can be complicated to interpret [1], Moreover, there has always been the concern that valence band spectra obtained from UPS are not representative of the bulk solid because it is believed that low KE photoelectrons have a short IMFP compared to high KE photoelectrons and are therefore more surface-sensitive [1], Despite their weaker intensities, valence band spectra are often obtained by XPS instead of UPS because they provide... [Pg.103]

Lutzenldrchen-Hecht and Strehhlow have investigated the electrochemical double layer on Ag electrodes in alkaline media [100] using ex situ XPS and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS). An... [Pg.925]


See other pages where Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy UPS is mentioned: [Pg.1678]    [Pg.1851]    [Pg.1859]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.982]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.188]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.32 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.120 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.223 , Pg.224 , Pg.225 , Pg.226 , Pg.227 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.160 , Pg.161 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.6 , Pg.865 , Pg.917 , Pg.942 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.139 ]




SEARCH



Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy

Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy UPS)/angle-resolved photoemission

Ultraviolet spectroscopy

© 2024 chempedia.info