Ultimate elongation prediction

It becomes difficult to use analytical expressions reliably even for the thermoelastic and transport properties if the morphology is very complex. It is all but impossible to use analytical expressions successfully to predict the large-deformation behavior (such as strength, toughness, and ultimate elongation before fracture) except in some relatively simple systems. The reason is that, while the thermoelastic properties are correlated most strongly with the volume fractions, shapes and orientations of different phase domains, several additional factors become... 

The most frequently measured rubber properties are the mechanical properties. These include hardness, ultimate tensile strength (UTS), ultimate elongation (UE), and stress at 100, 200, and 300 percent tensile strain. Though not really moduli, these stresses are referred to, in the rubber technologists jargon, aslOO, 200, and 300 percent modulus (MlOO, M200, and M300). Additional properties are measured to be more or less predictive of service performance. 

Damage can be noticed when melt flow index tests are performed and the reduction in molecular weight causes a higher melt flow value. Also, damage can be noticed when tensile tests are performed and decreases in ultimate elongation are noticed. The intention of this research is to derive a new Qio constant for the Arrhenius Equation to better predict shelf life of medical polymers. 

In addition to the modulus prediction, the ultimate properties including elongation and ultimate tensile strength, assuming good adhesion between filler and polymer, can be modeled by the following equations ... 

Tensile strength. Tensile strength describes the ultimate strength of a material when enough stress is applied to cause it to break. In combination with elongation and modulus, tensile strength can predict a material s toughness. 

Eq. 11 reproduces experimental results for simple extension (a> 1) fairly well. The behavior pf virtually all types of rubbers is remarkably similar in this respect. The observed force plotted against elongation typically displays greater curvature than the theory predicts. The two theoretical curves shown are in fact the same curve plotted on different ordinates, as is Indicated. The one is scaled to match the initial slope of the Mooney-Rivlin curve, and the other converges to the ultimate slope of that cvirve as a increases indefinitely. 

---