Tumbling anisotropic

The alternative explanation is that the disaccharide molecule as a whole is tumbling anisotropically and hence that the correlation times (xc-values) of the protons of the reducing ring are different from those of the non-reducing ring. This is a serious possibility because we know (19), (20) from studies of the 13c Rj-values of other disaccharides that their tumbling motion exhibits a small anisotropic component. 

The electron-spm echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) phenomenon [37, 38] is of primary interest in pulsed EPR of solids, where anisotropic hyperfme and nuclear quadnipole interactions persist. The effect can be observed as modulations of the echo intensity in two-pulse and three-pulse experiments in which x or J is varied. In liquids the modulations are averaged to zero by rapid molecular tumbling. The physical origin of ESEEM can be understood in tenns of the four-level spin energy diagram for the S = I = model system... 

The and operators determine the isotropic and anisotropic parts of the hyperfine coupling constant (eq. (10.11)), respectively. The latter contribution averages out for rapidly tumbling molecules (solution or gas phase), and the (isotropic) hyperfine coupling constant is therefore determined by the Fermi-Contact contribution, i.e. the electron density at the nucleus. 

R,1S isomer. However, this proposal is tentative, because X-ray diffraction has shown that another specimen of asperlin, possessing a different crystalline form, has structure 49b. It should be noted that 1 tumbles somewhat anisotropically, with D /D = 1.3, as deduced from C relaxation measurements. If, however, the anisotropic motion of 1 were not properly corrected for, the largest error in the measurement of its interproton distances would not exceed 4%. 

The special case of isotropic g and hyperfine interaction will now be considered. This simplification is valid when the anisotropic interactions are averaged by rapid tumbling. The quadrupole interaction will be omitted because it is purely anisotropic. The resulting simplified spin Hamiltonian is given in Equation (9). 

In any metalloprotein, be it tumbling in water or fixed in a frozen solution, not only the Zeeman interaction but also the hyperfine interaction will be anisotropic, so the resonance held in Equation 5.10 becomes a function of molecular orientation in the external held (or alternatively of the orientation of B in the molecular axes system) ... 

The anisotropy of the overall tumbling will result in the dependence of spin-relaxation properties of a given 15N nucleus on the orientation of the NH-bond in the molecule. This orientational dependence is caused by differences in the apparent tumbling rates sensed by various internuclear vectors in an anisotropically tumbling molecule. Assume we have a molecule with the principal components of the overall rotational diffusion tensor Dx, Dy, and l)z (x, y, and z denote the principal axes of the diffusion tensor), and let Dx< Dy< Dz. 

In order to discuss the origin of these terms we need to allow the spins to have anisotropic shielding tensors. Molecular tumbling in solution makes the chemical shielding in the direction of the external magnetic field a stochastic function of time and acts therefore as a relaxation mechanism, called the chemical shielding anisotropy (CSA) mechanism. The Hamiltonian for each of the two spins, analogous to Eq. (5), contains therefore two... 

Since none of the lattice models is now clearly superior, the choice for interpretation of spin relaxation in polymers is arbitrary. Familiarity leads us to select the Jones and Stockmayer model so we will now consider application of this model to several well studied polymer systems in order to compare dynamics from polymer to polymer. Also the equations required to consider anisotropic Internal rotation of substituent groups and overall molecular tumbling as independent motions in addition to backbone rearrangements caused by the three-bond jump are available for the Jones and Stockmayer model (13). 

High-spin dendrimers, like 5 (G = 1), are ideal probes for such a study since they are ESR active and this spectroscopy has the same time scale as such a dynamic process. In fact, the anisotropic components of some ESR parameters, such as those responsible for the fine structures of a high-spin molecule, are averaged out under molecular tumbling leading to noticeably lineshape effects. 

---