Triads, structural calculations

Like Rh and Ir, all three members of this triad have the fee structure predicted by band theory calculations for elements with nearly filled d shells. Also in this region of the periodic table, densities and mps are decreasing with increase in Z across the table thus, although by comparison... 

It is noteworthy that the to-bonded structure for ArF6 differs from that predicted by VSEPR theory. ArF6 is predicted to be of octahedral (Oh) symmetry, with three mutually perpendicular F i- Ar -h F triads and an s-type lone pair. In contrast, VSEPR predicts a pentagonal bipyramid (or other seven-vertex polyhedron) with some or all F-Ar-F angles less than 90°. The calculated equilibrium structure is in agreement with the co-bonding model. 

Calculation of As was carried out for hole transfer in finite DNA duplexes in water, in which one strand includes a G3(T) G3 sequence, n = 0-6, where G and T are, respectively, guanine and thymine nucleotide bases (in the complementary strand, of course, G and T are paired respectively, with cytosine and adenine bases) [23], The D and A sites (the solute) were taken as the middle unit of each G3 triad, or as alternative models for the n = 0 case, using one or both of the inner members of the G3 units). These structures lead to D/A sites in contact or separated by intervening bases ranging in number from 1 to 8. Using a base stacking separation of 3.4 A yields rDA = (m+ 1) (3.4 A), m = 0-8 (an estimate closely supported by detailed molecular force field calculations). 

Similarly, the pyridyl fullerenes 30 and 31 also axially bind to ZnNcCBu)4 (28) to form supramolecular triads in which the zinc(II) naphthalocyanine acts as an electron donor, the pyridyl fullerenes act as primary electron acceptors, and either the ferrocene (Fc) or iV,iV-dimethylaminophenyl (DMA) moiety serves as a second electron donor [43], Fig. 2 shows the optimized structures of the resulting triads calculated by density functional theory (DFT), showing that the three components are arranged in a linear fashion. The binding constants of these systems (7.4 x 104M 1 for [ZnNc( Bu)4] 30 and 10.2 x 104M 1 for [ZnNc( Bu)4] 31 in o-dichlorobenzene) determined by UV-Vis spectroscopy are comparable with... 

Mathematical procedures for calculating structural features of cyclocopolymers and of copolymers derived from them are proposed and are used in studies on the 1H-NMR spectra of styrene-methyl methacrylate copolymers derived from styrene-(methacrylic anhydride) copolymers. Reactivity ratios and cycliza-tion constants for styrene-methacrylic anhydride copolymerization were determined from structural features of the derived styrene-methyl methacrylate copolymers. The amount of uncyclized methacrylic anhydride units present in styrene-methacrylic anhydride copolymers having high styrene contents is considerably less than that predicted by these copolymerization parameters. The methoxy proton resonances of the derived copolymers are more intense in the highest field methoxy proton resonance area than would be expected if such resonance were due only to cosyndiotactic SMS triads. Possible explanations for these discrepancies are proposed. 

These equations are similar to those assumed for the reactivity ratio determination. In contrast to what has been observed for conventional styrene-MMA copolymers, however, these equations indicate that a substantial proportion of the (SMM+MMS)-type resonance appears to occur in the C-area. The proportion of methoxy resonance observed in the C-area, in fact, exceeds P(SMS) by a substantial amount for many of the copolymers. This can be due to the assumption of an inadequate model for the copolymerization reaction, to the use of incorrect reactivity ratios and cyclization constants for the calculations or to an inadequate understanding of the methoxy proton resonance patterns of S/MMA copolymers. It is possible that intramolecular reactions between propagating radicals and uncyclized methacrylic anhydride units present on propagating chains result in the formation of macrocycles. Failure to account for the formation of macrocycles would result in overestimation of rc and rc and in underestimation of the proportions of MMA units in SMS triads in the derived S./MMA copolymers. This might account for the results obtained. An alternate possibility is that a high proportion (>50%) of the M-M placements in the copolymers studied in this work can be expected to have meso placements (], J2), whereas only a small proportion of such placements ( 20%) are meso in conventional S/MMA copolymers. Studies with molecular models (20) have indicated that the methoxy protons on MMA units centered in structures such as the following can experience appreciable shielding by next nearest styrene units. 

---